Technology Review

Communications

Wireless Power Harvesting for Cell Phones

Nokia hopes to create a device that could harvest enough power to keep a cell phone topped up.

  • Tuesday, June 9, 2009
  • By Duncan Graham-Rowe

A cell phone that never needs recharging might sound too good to be true, but Nokia says it's developing technology that could draw enough power from ambient radio waves to keep a cell-phone handset topped up.

Ambient electromagnetic radiation--emitted from Wi-Fi transmitters, cell-phone antennas, TV masts, and other sources--could be converted into enough electrical current to keep a battery topped up, says Markku Rouvala, a researcher from the Nokia Research Centre, in Cambridge, U.K.

Rouvala says that his group is working towards a prototype that could harvest up to 50 milliwatts of power--enough to slowly recharge a phone that is switched off. He says current prototypes can harvest 3 to 5 milliwatts.

The Nokia device will work on the same principles as a crystal radio set or radio frequency identification (RFID) tag: by converting electromagnetic waves into an electrical signal. This requires two passive circuits. "Even if you are only getting microwatts, you can still harvest energy, provided your circuit is not using more power than it's receiving," Rouvala says.

Advertisement

To increase the amount of power that can be harvested and the range at which it works, Nokia is focusing on harvesting many different frequencies. "It needs a wideband receiver," says Rouvala, to capture signals from between 500 megahertz and 10 gigahertz--a range that encompasses many different radio communication signals.

Historically, energy-harvesting technologies have only been found in niche markets, powering wireless sensors and RFID tags in particular. If Nokia's claims stand up, then it could push energy harvesting into mainstream consumer devices.

Earlier this year, Joshua Smith at Intel and Alanson Sample at the University of Washington, in Seattle, developed a temperature-and-humidity sensor that draws its power from the signal emitted by a 1.0-megawatt TV antenna 4.1 kilometers away. This only involved generating 60 microwatts, however.

Smith says that 50 milliwatts could require around 1,000 strong signals and that an antenna capable of picking up such a wide range of frequencies would cause efficiency losses along the way.

"To get 50 milliwatts seems like a lot," adds Harry Ostaffe, head of marketing for Pittsburgh-based company Powercast, which sells a system for recharging sensors from about 15 meters away with a dedicated radio signal.

Steve Beeby, an engineer and physicist at the University of Southampton, U.K., who has researched harvesting vibrational energy, adds, "If they can get 50 milliwatts out of ambient RF, that would put me out of business." He says that the potential could be huge because MP3 players typically use only about 100 milliwatts of power and spend most of their time in lower-power mode.

Nokia is being cagey with the details of the project, but Rouvala is confident about its future: "I would say it is possible to put this into a product within three to four years." Ultimately, though, he says that Nokia plans to use the technology in conjunction with other energy-harvesting approaches, such as solar cells embedded into the outer casing of the handset.

Print

Related Articles

Nanogenerator Powers Up

A device containing piezoelectric nanowires can now scavenge enough energy to power small electronic devices.

How Wi-Fi Drains Your Cell Phone

A study finds problems, but also offers software fixes that could help cell phones last significantly longer between charges.

Intel's Wireless Power Play

A research project cuts the electric cord, wirelessly charging an electronic device.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

GhostRider

2 Comments

  • 981 Days Ago
  • 06/09/2009

Wireless ambient power

This would be useful for many gadgets. One gadget that came to mind would be a wireless tire pressure sensor.  They can have a sensor embeded in the wheel to sense tire pressure.  It will be power by wireless ambient energy.  It can send reading to the car so that when the tire pressure gets too low, it will give an alert to the driver.  And it would never have to replace a battery as it is power by ambient wireless power.

Reply

drudic

2 Comments

  • 981 Days Ago
  • 06/09/2009

Wireless ambient power

Shouldn't such a system be fairly reliant on exactly where you are and how many electromagnetic devices are operating around you? I mean it would operate better if i had my TV, microwave oven and stereo on, whereas it wouldn't be as efficient if i were standing in a underground parking lot for examples sake. More energy around me, more juice in my mobile phone or what ever other device its powering.

Reply

Darko

3 Comments

  • 981 Days Ago
  • 06/09/2009

Re: Wireless ambient power

The electronics in your house are in general all RECEIVING electrical signals, not TRANSMITTING.   Since I am guessing a lot of the energy comes from cell tower transmissions it would matter if you are in an area with good reception though.

Reply

jhertzberg

15 Comments

  • 981 Days Ago
  • 06/09/2009

Re: Wireless ambient power

I would expect that a piezoelectric sensor may be a more straightforward solution for your tire pressure example. There would be ample kinetic energy available for harvesting where a rotating tire is involved.

Reply

YankeeBruce

21 Comments

  • 981 Days Ago
  • 06/09/2009

Re: Wireless ambient power

Piezoelectric Tire Pressure Sensors have been installed as a factory otion in vehicles for over 10 years now; old technology. 

Reply

sdysart

3 Comments

  • 981 Days Ago
  • 06/09/2009

Gadget Charger

It does sound like the recharging ability will depend very much on your surroundings but if you couple this ability with more efficient phones, then you will really be on to something. 

It wouldn't need to completely replace the plug in charger, but if you are going on a trip you could conceivably leave the charger at home.

Reply

aldecal

15 Comments

  • 981 Days Ago
  • 06/09/2009

Wild Stuff

Go Nokia Go!

Utilizing photovoltaics as well is wonderful then the added real estate could have embedded antennas to trap a wider variety of electromagnetic ambient energy.  There are a whole host of antenna geometries that could be applied with semi-lithographic processes and work in conjunction with the photovoltaic circuits.  These 2 energy based sources could actually contribute to increased efficiencies of both technologies.  We may have the beginnings of the discovery of something like X-rays where 2 relative forces would produce an amplification effect.  Thank You, Nokia for stepping up and producing basic technology innovations.

Reply

Advertisement

paulfmeyer

18 Comments

  • 981 Days Ago
  • 06/09/2009

Tesla was right?

100 years ago the wireless transmission of power was promoted by Nikola Tesla, but his efforts were not welcomed by Westinghouse or Edison, who worried that they would't be able to bill consumers without meters.

Reply

olmon

32 Comments

  • 981 Days Ago
  • 06/09/2009

Re: Tesla was right?

I was going to comment on that fact, but you beat me to it.  There is a lot of technology that we COULD have, if it didn't cut into somebodies profits.

Reply

IHiJump

2 Comments

  • 981 Days Ago
  • 06/09/2009

Re: Tesla was right?

Radio is the wireless transmission of energy.  So Tesla won out after all... it's just that people are finally beginning to realize it's useful.

Don't I recall stories people going round with electrical utilities, accused of stealing power, when trying to harvest ambient em energy?

Reply

Darko

3 Comments

  • 981 Days Ago
  • 06/09/2009

Re: Tesla was right?

Wireless energy transfer is still extraordinarily inefficient:

http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/18836/

Thats 45% efficiency under ideal conditions and a transfer distance of only a few meters.

Reply

perrelet

1 Comment

  • 980 Days Ago
  • 06/10/2009

Re: Tesla was right?

Last year IBM managed to replicate Tesla's 1894 implementation at 75% efficiency:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_energy_transfer#History_of_wireless_energy_transfer


Reply

Phineas

127 Comments

  • 981 Days Ago
  • 06/09/2009

RE: Charge

When recharging your pacemaker off the microwave oven, remember 'never put your finger in the light socket'.

http://4gifs.com/gallery/d/85247-2/Electrocuted_on_train.gif

Reply

joelsapp

21 Comments

  • 981 Days Ago
  • 06/09/2009

Since they mention that this would only work if the phone is off, I would think they would have a battery saving mode that would shutoff the phone during the evening or if you are in a specific location - and have your calls transfered. Like xfer your calls to work or your landline when you are in a specific area.

Reply

Advertisement

drudic

2 Comments

  • 980 Days Ago
  • 06/10/2009

Re:  Power-less

Well being that cellphones do spend majority of their life time in a low power mode it does seem like an appropriate devise to implement this kinda technology into. Even if this kinda battery charging method was able to charge just enough to keep my mobile at constant power level during low power mode, or when its not being used, it would be really something.

Reply

  • 979 Days Ago
  • 06/11/2009

Replace the battery with a capacitor

While a capacitor has lower capacity than a battery, it also is much more efficient to charge. A side benefit would be a less expensive phone since capacitors are a small fraction of the cost of a battery. If the signal was too weak to charge the capacitor, it would probably also be too weak to make a call. The net would be a RFID like phone, it would only work where it would completely work: power and signal strength.

Reply

yenaldlooshi

2 Comments

  • 979 Days Ago
  • 06/11/2009

Free power

Neat idea!, but having a 3 meter satellite dish connected to your cell phone is a bit inconvenient.

Reply

kansan

1 Comment

  • 978 Days Ago
  • 06/12/2009

No Doubt

The engineers have constructed wide band, and band specific RF field strength meters to get an idea what kind of power could be harvested from ambient RF fields. I would think the best they could hope for is to recharge a battery, or perhaps that capacitor another mentioned. Most likely broadcast transmitters, would be the most practical source, 24/7 operation at fairly high power levels.

Reply

john99872546

1 Comment

  • 978 Days Ago
  • 06/12/2009

Technology

Would it not cause any harm to the transmitters around? Will there be any distortion in radio signals or something like that?

John Wright
Glowtouch Technologies

Reply

vinod

1 Comment

  • 435 Days Ago
  • 12/07/2010

Re: Technology

This technology should come into the market soon.....May be nokia needs change even few communication protocols like we use in Wireless Sensor Networks.

-Vinod
www.amateurgeeks.com

Reply

muemmel

1 Comment

  • 124 Days Ago
  • 10/14/2011

Diese Erfindung wurde von mir vor einigen Jahren zum Patent angemeldet. Dies habe ich bei ICQ beschrieben, von wo sie mir gestohlen wurde. Daran waren auch Festangestellte von ICQ und in diesem Umfeld beteiligt, mit denen ich geschrieben habe. So gelangte diese Entwicklung zu Nokia, welche Sie jetzt als ihre ausgeben. Dabei wurde fast wortwörtlich meine Beschreibung übernommen.
Dies kann durch Dokumente belegt werden.
Ich gebe Nokia vor einer Klage die Möglichkeit einer außergerichtlichen Einigung.
Skype- Name Mirko.Leitner

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Serious Materials

Zynga

Groupon

Novomer

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement