Communications

Wearable Sensors Watch Workers

(Page 2 of 2)

  • Wednesday, May 13, 2009
  • By Kate Greene

The data collected by each sociometer can, for instance, reveal how central a person is to a social network and how cohesive the network is overall. A more cohesive network is one in which all people talk to each other, thereby forming a closed loop. This may be an important measure of workplace social dynamics: workers in the most cohesive networks were about 30 percent more productive than those who weren't in such networks, according to the call-center study.

The researchers chose a call center for their research because productivity is constantly monitored and recorded--the number of calls and other tasks completed, and the time taken for each of them throughout the day.

"The thing that's really innovative is bringing social-network data together with productivity and performance data," says Eric Brynjolfsson, a professor at the Sloan Business School at MIT, who worked on the project.

The findings come at a time when telecommuting is booming, thanks to digital communication tools such as e-mail, instant messaging, and teleconferencing. Cameron Anderson, a professor at the Haas School of Business at the University of California, Berkeley, suggests that organizations could use such findings to weigh the costs and benefits of telecommuting, or to schedule break times for workers. "More interaction will likely bolster information transfer across individuals and departments," he says. "Studies have shown this is extremely important to organizational success."

In the case of the call center, Pentland notes that workers' break times were staggered, making it difficult for many of them to interact in person. "The people who managed to have more cohesive support groups were in atypical situations," he says. The next phase of the study is to see if productivity improves when workers are given opportunities for more direct social interaction.

"The underlying theme here is that humans are social beings," says Pentland, who will present details of the work at the Where 2.0 conference in San Jose, CA, next week. "Technology pushes us toward the abstract, and away from richer face-to-face communication." Without direct communication, he says, many physical signals, such as body language and facial expression, are lost.

Print

Related Articles

TR10: Reality Mining

Sandy Pentland is using data gathered by cell phones to learn about human behavior.

Smart Badges Track Human Behavior

MIT researchers used conference badges to collect data on people's interactions and visualize the social network.

Making Phones Polite

Privacy-sensitive software could minimize interruptions.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

ESS_BILBAO

14 Comments

  • 1008 Days Ago
  • 05/13/2009

I think those are extreme measures to control workers productivity. Assume that the workers have no privacy when they're working, is to go so far.
http://esns.blogspot.com/
http://twitter.com/ESS_BILBAO

Reply

ms

190 Comments

  • 1008 Days Ago
  • 05/13/2009

A call center is a typical work environment?

Choosing to study call centers because productivity is easy to measure there is like looking for your lost keys under the streetlight because it's easy to search there. Extrapolating results to a general work environment seems ludicrous.

Reply

bwaber

1 Comment

  • 1008 Days Ago
  • 05/13/2009

Re: A call center is a typical work environment?

I'm working in Sandy's group, so I have some of the background knowledge on this.  Definitely, one of the reasons we chose a call center was that this was an easy place to go, and this isn't representative of all work environments.  But we did find the same results in IT firms and a marketing division of a German company, so it seems fairly general.

Reply

T-Ram

1 Comment

  • 1006 Days Ago
  • 05/15/2009

Re: A call center is a typical work environment?

Whether a "typical" setting or not, the study involves actual human interface; a telling reminder of the utility and limits of "technology" in achieving substantive project goals. The Kellogg School reported a study comparing productivity in deal negotiation by e-mail. Group A negotiating pairs preceded the exercise with a voice phone call, Group B pairs did not. In line with your research, Group A pairs exhibited higher success rates in reaching a deal.

Reply

mkogrady

425 Comments

  • 1003 Days Ago
  • 05/18/2009

Micro Version

How about making a micro version and affixing it to incarcerated persons so the guards can determine the social inner workings of criminal empires and their respective inter-realtionships.

Another version could be embedded into E-Cards for Welfare and social programs for similar reasons. Not that all welfare recipients are criminals, but there is quite a bit of skimming going on int he welfare ranks and identifying inner circles can bring high returns from a tax recovery perspective.

Reply

meneghelo

2 Comments

  • 1002 Days Ago
  • 05/19/2009

bias in the research?

I'm wondering... just how prone are people to working harder when they know their day-to-day chatting activity is being monitored in some way??

Reply

desertredwolf

1 Comment

  • 987 Days Ago
  • 06/03/2009

Improve remote communication

Yet another Luddite attempt to minimize the effectiveness of remote communication and remote workers.  If human to human interaction appears to improve communication and innovation, how about we Improve the remote communication mechanisms so that we don't dilute the human to human component like we do with the minimalist solutions that are offered today.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Toyota

Goldwind Science and Technology

Joule Unlimited

Google

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement