Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Wireless at Fiber Speeds

Continued from page 1

By Kate Greene

Friday, October 03, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

In the past few years, researchers at Georgia Tech, MIT, Intel, and elsewhere have made great strides in developing millimeter-wave devices. Companies such as Intel have even started pushing for standards that could help develop interoperable technologies that operate at 60 gigahertz. And one company, Gigabeam, has rolled out products that can achieve around one gigabit per second using a point-to-point link over a few hundred meters.

Ridgway explains that using telecommunication lasers has two big advantages. First, they are high power, so the resulting millimeter wave is also of relatively high power. Second, the lasers have been engineered to be stable and dependable, producing a signal that doesn't fluctuate much compared with standard millimeter-wave sources.

Alan Crouch, director of the Communications Technology Lab at Intel, says that the Battelle work is further evidence that millimeter-wave technology could become increasingly important. "There's demand for more and more wireless communication solutions in this space," he says, adding that "there is strong industry interest."

But the research may be years away from being deployed in a product. Ridgway explains that, since the system has been put together from existing components, it's much larger than it ultimately needs to be. In addition, a property of the signal called polarization, which plays a role in encoding data, tends to drift during operation, which means that the system requires attention when running. But Ridgway hopes that, with some more engineering, these problems can be ironed out. "We'd like to get it to a point where you could just turn on and go," he says.

Comments

  • Satellite communications?
    I realize this is a huge leap forward but, what about using this instead of cell towers to run our portable devices? I do realize that the thing keeping cellphone satellites back is the slow connection speeds and all the trafic coming through it at one time. It would be awesome if we could live in a world where you were never out of touch!
    Rate this comment: 12345

    camdaddy09
    10/03/2008
    Posts:37
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Limitations
    There are some limitations that may be worked through but make me reserved.  For starters it looks like this is unidirectional, which means it will largely be used for backbones.  I think we are getting ahead of ourselves with images of a dish on every roof delivering 10Gbps dancing in our heads.  Next, as far as I know the higher frequency = more easily blocked by physical matter such as trees, houses, etc.  This is why 2.4ghz is still favored over 5ghz in spite of the 2.4 freq. being cluttered. 

    This sounds great, but I think the applications will still be very limited.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    runlevelfour
    10/03/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    • Re: Limitations
      @runlevelfour You're definitely right about limitations. Since the signal is sent in a point-to-point manner, it's not the sort of wireless that could work as a cellular network. That said, there are plenty of applications where cutting the cord or fiber, even in direct line of sight, could be beneficial.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Kate Greene
      10/03/2008
      Posts:16
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • False
    Higher frequencies do not allow for higher transfer rates because they "oscillate faster."  This is simply not true at all. Hey, don't you guys teach Shannon's theorem over at MIT? It's from 1949 and it is a fundamental concept in communications technology.  It is just as important with modern 10 gigabit wireless technology as it was in 1949.  The limit of the bits that you can pack into any given amount of spectrum is based on the modulation rate, the noise floor, and the channel bandwidth.  The 60 GHz and 100 GHz bands have more speed because they allow for huge (1GHz+) RF channel bandwidth.  These high frequencies don't propagate well (they are absorbed by anything) so they aren't considered highly valuable.  Thus, large chunks are given away.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    funkmaster
    10/03/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • What type of modulation?
    How and what type of modulation are they performing on the laser beam? I'm assuming that they modulate the frequency on one beam to create a beat frequency that is in the 100 GHZ neighborhood.

    So, I'm curious, and I'm hoping someone can clarify for me: Are they modulating the actual frequency of the beam (i.e. the color of the laser beam) or do they use a more conventional Pulse Width Modulation approach to achieve the resultant frequency? If it was PWM, wouldn't you have to Modulate somewhere the millimeter and above spectrum anyway in order to get the right beat frequency?

    Also, as far as the 10GHZ signal being up-converted to 100GHZ, since we're talking about data transmission, wouldn't it be possible to just divide the data stream and multiplex into the 100GHZ spectrum? Which is theoretically cheaper? 10 TX pairs to get 100 gigabit bandwidth or one laser setup per TX point? 
    Rate this comment: 12345

    josefski
    10/03/2008
    Posts:6
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Propagation Losses
    Using MMW & sub-MMW for line-of-sight communication purposes has been studied for quite some time, especially in context of inter-satellite.  The high power requirements are needed to offset the atmospheric, precipitation, and other propagation losses and effects.  If I remember correctly, there are four useful windows:  35, 94, 120, and 220 GHz. I'm glad to finally see some investment in this area.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    gcmandrake
    10/03/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

The Marcellus Shale Gas Rush
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Featured Content
Sponsored by:
White Papers

Twelve ways to reduce costs with SQL Server 2008
Find out how to reduce costs and get more efficient

Download

Total Economic Impact of SQL Server 2008 Upgrade
Forrester reports on increasing productivity and management capabilities

Download 

Achieving Cost and Resource Savings with UC
How Office Communications Server R2 and Exchange Server can make your business smarter and more efficient

Download 

The Compelling Case for Conferencing
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

How Windows Server 2008 R2 Helps Optimize IT and Save you Money
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Live Migration
See how Windows Server 2008 R2 and Hyper-V enable virtualization and Live Migration

Download
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.