Communications

Jott: Calling It In

(Page 2 of 2)

  • Friday, March 30, 2007
  • By Wade Roush

Jott's strength may be its convenience. It doesn't involve a software download (as ReQall does), a cellular-carrier middleman, or (as yet) any fees. Pollard says it was important to him and cofounder Shreedhar Madhavapeddi to build something simple. "The core philosophy of Jott is that we want to use stuff that's already entrenched in your life--you don't have to buy a new phone or download a bunch of new software," he says.

Even the speech-to-text process at Jott is low-tech. Jott's phone system makes sense of contact names such as "myself" using speech recognition software, but such software is still far too primitive to deal with the unrestricted vocabulary that callers use in their actual messages, not to mention rushed or garbled speech or audio junk such as ums and uhs. So Jott saves messages as sound clips on central servers. Human workers at a large call center in India log onto the servers, listen to the most recent clips, and transcribe them manually. In case a transcription is murky, every e-mail from Jott also contains a link to the original sound clip.

"Over time, speech recognition software will get good enough so that shorter, clearer Jotts will be transcribed in a completely automated fashion or will at worst be sent to a quality-assurance person who reads them, listens to the sound file, and says, 'Yes, this is completely accurate,'" says Pollard. "But for now, 100 percent of Jotts go through a human being."

In my tests, Jott transcriptions arrived in my e-mail in-box quickly (within about 10 minutes of my calling the service) and were remarkably accurate. Jott's transcribers even corrected one of my own mistakes. I was leaving myself a reminder to pick up plaque remover for my dog's water bowl, and in an attempt to be helpful, I spelled out the word "plaque." But instead of "P-L-A-Q-U-E," I said "P-L-A-Q-E." Someone in India thoughtfully inserted the missing "u."

Pollard won't reveal how many people are using Jott so far, but he says the company is beating its own projections. Some users have told the company that they already depend on Jott for critical tasks such as coordinating in-home medical care for elderly relatives, Pollard says, making him optimistic that many users can be converted into premium customers. "We've had plenty of people say they would be willing to pay for something like this," he says.

More in Communications

A Novel Way to Share Songs

Read More »
Print

Related Articles

How Google's Ear Hears

The new voice-search application for the iPhone marks a milestone for spoken interfaces.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

jmazzi

1 Comment

  • 1783 Days Ago
  • 03/30/2007

Braincast Link

Hey,

I just wanted to point out that the link to braincast is:

http://braincast.viatalk.com

:)

Reply

Guest (bertibus)

  • 1783 Days Ago
  • 03/30/2007

Re: Braincast Link

Calling your own answering machine seems to be as efficient, (two steps to send and retrieve) and has the added advantage of being more secure.

Reply

hankejh

20 Comments

  • 1783 Days Ago
  • 03/30/2007

Re: Braincast Link

...your answering machine will not call/remind you of a meeting nor will it transcribe voice to text and transmit to email (well, not yet).

Reply

hankejh

20 Comments

  • 1783 Days Ago
  • 03/30/2007

Dr. Seuss

Often, our best ideas strike us where we least intend them to - The Waiting Place (Dr. Seuss), "waiting for the fish to bite or waiting for the wind to fly a kite or waiting around for Friday night." 

I've yet to use Jott, but I have been using ReQall for a month.  It helps me keep track of thoughts that would otherwise have gone missing.  I do like the sans-software nature of Jott, but I should note that ReQall's PC-software download is hardly an inconvenience, and there is no mobile phone software requirement. 

Looking to the future - I can already record voice notes on my Windows Mobile 5 phone with a dedicated voice-record button.  I wish that recording could be emailed to Jott (et al.), then returned as a text email.  Ideally, the return email could carry Calendar and/or Task event attachments, which I could then readily add to my agenda.

Reply

plasticdoc

27 Comments

  • 1781 Days Ago
  • 04/01/2007

Jott

Why would anyone want to submit an idea on the insecure net??

Reply

mightybob

9 Comments

  • 1781 Days Ago
  • 04/01/2007

Re: Jott

Because the first of April brings with it many strange things.

Reply

swordfishdata

7 Comments

  • 1780 Days Ago
  • 04/02/2007

Re: Jott

Did you follow ANY of the links on this article? Between this, the dog article, and the PGD article, all you've succeeded in pointing out is that you can't read dates in the form of "Friday, March 30, 2007."

Reply

Advertisement

hankejh

20 Comments

  • 1780 Days Ago
  • 04/02/2007

Re: Jott

1) What are the odds of an idea being intercepted by a person even remotely interested in the idea? 

2) If the idea is _that_ good, it surely is memorable enough not to require storing. 

3) For the overwhelming majority of users, this has more to do with remembering tasks than brilliant ideas - who cares about your task list?  Is your 10:30a meeting really that secret?

Reply

michaelcogan75

1 Comment

  • 1654 Days Ago
  • 08/06/2007

Very low tech

I am slightly surprised to see the MIT Technology Review cover such a low tech service. Speech technology is so far from supporting automatic speech-to-text. The fact that a human ear is involved in the process, reduces the value of the service and makes it less attractive for mass usage.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Cotendo

1366 Technologies

A123 Systems

Lattice Power

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement