Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

A Novel Way to Share Songs

Continued from page 1

By Rachel Ross

Monday, March 26, 2007

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

By using FM radio, Heath got around another pesky problem: patents. Heath is not the only one who has thought that wireless music sharing would be a good idea, and some researchers already hold patents on ideas similar to hers. In 2005, researchers at the MIT Media Lab Europe patented their own system, which involved wirelessly sharing music using Wi-Fi or Bluetooth (a wireless communication scheme used for short-range data transfer between digital devices).

Mike O'Malley, now a program manager for Microsoft, built a similar device while he was a student at the University of Massachusetts Amherst last year. His scheme used Bluetooth to transmit music.

O'Malley thinks that Heath's product is interesting because it gets around a problem he encountered during his research. Unlike O'Malley's system, NoeStringsAttached can broadcast to multiple devices at once. O'Malley says he also appreciates the fact that it can work with different kinds of devices.

"That's the compelling part about it," he says. "Any device--whether it's a Zune, iPod, or Creative Zen [player]--can share the same music."

Microsoft's Zune player also lets owners wirelessly share songs, but the recipient only gets three plays or three days with the track--whichever comes first. And songs can only be shared from one Zune to another.

FM radio doesn't offer the same sound quality as Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, but Heath believes that people won't mind. She notes that the old-fashioned radio signal is still a popular broadcast medium.

"I think the quality is good enough for them, especially when you consider the price," says Heath.

Now CEO of her own company, Passive Devices, Heath hopes to study business in college. She has already submitted a patent for her idea of broadcasting to small spaces and plans to submit more. (The Heath family is still based in San Francisco, but the company is officially registered in Denver because Colorado allows teens to write checks.)

A NoeStringsAttached kit, which includes two transmitter/receiver units and a set of headphones, costs $59.99. Powered by a single AAA battery, each unit can transmit tunes for up to 9 hours or act as a receiver for approximately 20 hours.

Right now the kits, which are manufactured in China, can only be purchased through eBay. Heath declines to say how many kits she has sold so far, but she says that an updated version of the device should be in stores by Christmas.

Comments

  • Way to go!
    It's great to see more young entrepreneurs doing great things. Keep it up Kristyn! I think you can definitely get retail distribution for your device.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Theo Tonca
    03/26/2007
    Posts:1
  • [no subject]
    Can I have email address for Allen Heath ?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    matrixnano
    03/26/2007
    Posts:1
  • and this is differant from a FM transmitter ?
    I don't c a point in reinventing a FM transmitter. There are more than 1000 different short range FM transmitters and they are cheep to operate as FM radio can be bought from 1$.
    Simplest example is a Car changer or there is a big new expensive range of FM transmitter for I-Pod ?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    askmahesh
    03/26/2007
    Posts:4
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: and this is differant from a FM transmitter ?
      agreed.

      i actually had one of these in around '98 or so in my car. it was hooked up to my discman and i had my stereo tuned to the FM frequency, because i didnt have an in-dash CD player.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      brunascle
      03/26/2007
      Posts:68
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
    • Relevance?
      Can you point to even one out of "over a 1,000" FM transmitters that is relevant? Where did you come up with an inventory of over 1,000 FM transmitters on the market?
      Rate this comment: 12345

      hankejh
      03/26/2007
      Posts:20
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      • Re: Relevance?
        i'm not sure what you mean by "relevant", but here's one designed for the iPod: http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=7521149&st=FM+Transmitter&type=product&id=1127210996478

        his point is that the device itself, a simple FM transmitter, has been around for years. i had one 10 years ago in my car to get my discman to play through my car stereo. you could create your own NoeStringsAttached system youself by hooking a self-powered FM transmitter to your MP3 player. anyone nearby with an FM radio could hear what you're listenting to.

        it's her use of it, to share the signal with others rather than just yourself, that's novel. i dont think anyone's thought of using it for this purpose before.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        brunascle
        03/26/2007
        Posts:68
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
        • Re: Relevance?
          Brunascle, I think you know what I mean by "relevant": This article is about a "novel way to share songs" - not the formerly novel idea of broadcasting music to a car stereo.  The Griffin and similar devices wouldn't qualify as prior art and they aren't relevant because they do not solve the same problem that Kristyn Heath addressed: sharing songs with other paired-device connected person(s).
          Rate this comment: 12345

          hankejh
          03/26/2007
          Posts:20
          Avg Rating:
          4/5
          • Re: Relevance?
            i dont know if it would qualify as "prior art", but the Griffin device (or any other like it) most definitely is relevant. the NoeStringsAttached system is two devices in one: an FM transmitter and an FM receiver. many MP3 players (such as Creative's Zen) already have an FM receiver. assuming the devices around me also have FM receivers (if not, you can usually buy an adapter), all i need is an FM transmitter.

            actually, the Griffin device is only relevant if the iPod comes with an FM receiver (i dont know, i have a Zen). i was going to link to anyother device that adds an FM radio to an iPod, but it looks like both the Griffin and this radio use the same plug, which is unfortunate.
            Rate this comment: 12345

            brunascle
            03/26/2007
            Posts:68
            Avg Rating:
            4/5
          • Re: Relevance?
            here's a better example:
            Kensington iPod Digital FM Radio & Transmitter
            http://www.educational-software.com/kensington-ipod-digital-fm-radio-and-transmitter-details.html

            this is a transmitter and radio in one for the iPod. this _does not_ have the words "share with friends" in the description, but if it did have that description before Kristyn invented her device i believe that would qualify as "prior art".
            Rate this comment: 12345

            brunascle
            03/26/2007
            Posts:68
            Avg Rating:
            4/5
            • Re: Relevance?
              Now the Kensington device is a better example, Brunascle.  Question: does the Kensington allow simultaneous transmission of music over FM _and_ listening to the same music on the device transmitting?  This may be the one remaining crucial difference: Kensington does not appear to allow the music-sharer to listen to the music on the device to which it is attached.  That is to say, it can only be heard on an FM receiver.  From what I can discern, Kristyn’s invention allows the music-sharer to not only share songs with other paired-device connected person(s), but also listen to the music she is sharing on her own headphones. Hmm…  In any event, I hope Kristyn jams all the way to the bank.  ;)
              Rate this comment: 12345

              hankejh
              03/26/2007
              Posts:20
              Avg Rating:
              4/5
    • Re: and this is differant from a FM transmitter ?
      Give the young lady a break.  She didn't reinvent the FM transmitter, she found a new use for it.  Her invention was making a device that was convenient and cheap for sharing music.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      cyberpageman
      03/26/2007
      Posts:35
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      • Re: and this is differant from a FM transmitter ?
        I could not agree more, cyberpageman. Kristyn's work exhibits the exploratory problem solving nature of inventing. What these ridiculous comments on automobile FM transmitters have to do with her wireless music sharing invention totally escapes me.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        hankejh
        03/26/2007
        Posts:20
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
  • Another way to share...
    That's pretty neat, 15 feet is a bit short though, but a great star!

    A different way to share music under different circumstances is to let friends browse the music folders on your harddrive. They can copy what they want to their own harddrive, even entire folders of music, and it's not just restricted to music files. The way to do this is with GigaTribe software, which is free at: http://www.gigatribe.com
    Rate this comment: 12345

    johnarama
    03/26/2007
    Posts:1
  • !!
    Congratulations, Kristyn, on your first patent pending _and_ new business. Sixteen and already cultivating your inner inventor and businesswoman.  I hope to see NoeStrings on the store shelves, subways and streets of New York!
    Rate this comment: 12345

    hankejh
    03/26/2007
    Posts:20
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Price?!
    No offense to the inventors, but I could buy an Apple Shuffle (not to mention a multitude of less expensive players) for my friends to listen to and have it cost about the same...
    Rate this comment: 12345

    obrien234
    03/27/2007
    Posts:1
    • Re: Price?!
      ...and burden yourself with loading music while only sharing that subset music collection from your total collection until you get home to rebuild the Shuffle library. Perhaps, you should just burn them a CD. ;)
      Rate this comment: 12345

      hankejh
      03/30/2007
      Posts:20
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
    • Re: Price?!
      actually, i think price is one of this thing's positive points. you could actually put together something that did the same thing as this right now, but it would cost quite a bit more than $60, and it would probably be awkward to use and could have limitations, because it was not designed with this use in mind.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      brunascle
      04/11/2007
      Posts:68
      Avg Rating:
      4/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Laser-Triggered Chemical Reactions
Featured Content
Sponsored by:
White Papers

Twelve ways to reduce costs with SQL Server 2008
Find out how to reduce costs and get more efficient

Download

Total Economic Impact of SQL Server 2008 Upgrade
Forrester reports on increasing productivity and management capabilities

Download 

Achieving Cost and Resource Savings with UC
How Office Communications Server R2 and Exchange Server can make your business smarter and more efficient

Download 

The Compelling Case for Conferencing
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

How Windows Server 2008 R2 Helps Optimize IT and Save you Money
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Live Migration
See how Windows Server 2008 R2 and Hyper-V enable virtualization and Live Migration

Download
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.