Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

A Dangerous Step toward Space Warfare

Continued from page 1

By Brittany Sauser

Friday, October 27, 2006

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

The topic of weaponizing space is a sensitive one, and Arquilla, who is privy to much classified military information, would not comment on whether the U.S. plans to launch weapons into orbit. But he notes that many defensive methods don't require offensive capabilities--in particular, a proposed system called the Autonomous Nanosatellite Guardian for Evaluating Local Space (ANGELS), which will allow the United States to move its satellites to safer locations.

The new space policy does more than just re-assert America's freedom of action in space. It also calls on NASA and other agencies to gear up for technological innovation and "human and robotic space exploration programs."

"The policy is in its early stages, and at this point we are continuing to go forward with the programs currently in operation, such as the Mars Rovers and several of the long-term missions," says Robert Mirelson, a senior NASA official. "There are no real big 180-degree changes under the national space policy as it pertains to us, [and] the time line remains the same."

As part of that time line, which runs until 2030, NASA plans to complete the International Space Station and shuttle program by 2010 and to develop a new crew exploration vehicle (CEV) for a return to the moon. The CEV, named Orion, is part of the new Constellation Program, which is scheduled to be ready for testing in 2008. If all works well, Constellation will launch in 2014.

"We depend on Congress for our budget, and that affects programs," says Mirelson. "Until you see that in black and white, you can't talk specifics across the board. I mean, nobody is expecting any radical reductions and certainly not any radical expansions for [fiscal year] 2007."

Despite experts' concerns about the new NSP, most are also hopeful that the United States will collaborate and cooperate with other space-faring nations if technology, budgets, and policies permit. These experts hope that the use of space, as the NSP states, will continue to "enhance security, protect lives and the environment, speed information flow, serve as an engine for economic growth, and revolutionize the way people view their place in the world and the cosmos"--not just for the United States but all "hosts of nations, consortia, businesses, and entrepreneurs" that use space.

Comments

  • Space Is Already Militarized
    Why would anybody expect space might not be militarized?  We routinely send military communications through space and operate military sensor platforms in space.  Missiles and bombs are guided by navigational signals originating in space.  Europe, Russia, China, Japan, Israel, India and others have some and seek all of the same military capabilities in space.  They also seek technologies and systems to limit or eliminate potential opponents' use of space.  The only "unilateral" action in space that is possible for the United States at this time is partial or complete disarmament, which would be very foolish and utterly useless.  Every other state that can will continue to seek every possible advantage in space, be it military, commercial or scientific.     
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Colin
    10/27/2006
    Posts:7
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: Space Is Already Militarized
      I believe the problem is with the way the attitude will be perceived. You can have a military and defend your interests without waving a stick in peoples' faces.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Monsterboy
      10/27/2006
      Posts:89
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      • Re: Space Is Already Militarized
        It is true that the Bush people do not understand the concept of diplomacy. They are a bunch of arrogant and rude people. As a result of their behavior, our enemies will become galvanized, and possibly even unite against us.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        gabrielg01
        10/27/2006
        Posts:405
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
        • Re: Space Is Already Militarized
          Well he will be gone soon and they all know it.When McCain becomes prez he will be tough but very diplomatic.
          The real question is what have we already got up there??Does it really have nuclear capability?If you dont believe its there just keep your head in the sand.
          oh ya McCain 4 prez believe that too who else is there//Hillary ??not this lifetime!!!
          Rate this comment: 12345

          McMillan968
          10/27/2006
          Posts:38
          Avg Rating:
          2/5
        • Re: Space Is Already Militarized
          By diplomacy, do you mean the fine art of whispering sweet nothings while stabbing your opponent in the back?  Diplomacy as the art of developing compromise solutions to conflicting interests between reasonable people is only an option if there can be trust that all parties will make an attempt to live up to their obligations under the agreement.  Diplomacy as played by China and North Korea is, get all the goodies you can, accuse your opponent of hostility, finally make vague promises with no intention of keeping them.  The US on the other hand tries very hard to come up with fair agreements which are supposed to make everyone like us or at least acknowledge us as being fair, fat chance.  We also tend to take our obligations seriously and not cheat much compared to the rest of the world.
          Rate this comment: 12345

          jsessex
          10/27/2006
          Posts:13
          Avg Rating:
          4/5
          • Re: Space Is Already Militarized
            Walk softly, but carry a big stick - as Teddy Roosevelt said. Bush's policy is the opposite - walk loudly, be bragadocious, and carry an imaginary stick. Sooner or later someone will call on the bluff, like North Korea just did.

            Be strong without offending anyone (or at least try to minimize offensive things), that is the nature of diplomacy. That is what Bush does not comprehend (among many, many other things).

            We should be minding our business quietly. No need to publish inflammatory documents, like this useless space policy document (the policy is useful, the document itself is useless).
            Rate this comment: 12345

            gabrielg01
            10/28/2006
            Posts:405
            Avg Rating:
            3/5
            • Re: Space Is Already Militarized
              Hope for peace but prepare for war. We need not encourage enemies. They are numerous and perfectly capable of chaos without an invitation.

              England's "Peace In Our Time" was a classic example, that we should not repeat. Space is not sacrosanct. We must be as innovative above the earth as on it.
              Rate this comment: 12345

              Phineas
              10/28/2006
              Posts:85
              Avg Rating:
              4/5
    • Re: Space Is Already Militarized
      There is a distinction in the debate between the militarization and the weaponization of outer space.  Everyone concurs that space has already been militarized, however there is still disagreement on whether it has been weaponized. Weaponization would involve the deployment of space weapons, weapons that have the capacity to attack assets in space, or earth-based assets from space.

      Here's a good definition that makes the distinction clearer:

      http://www.spacedebate.org/evidence/2149/
      Rate this comment: 12345

      schnippy
      10/29/2006
      Posts:1
  • Much ado without knowing much
    So much for weaponization and militarization. Most of it rests around individual perception and very little is well informed debate. The little informed debate is also clouded by ignorance of basic physics (leave alone orbital mechanics), space law and military advancement. get an education & then begin debatin. Suggest debate after getting the facts in place. Try laying your hands on "Space: The Frontiers of Modern Defence" by Squadron Leader KK Nair and then resume an "enlightened debate" on the subject.
    De Burnett. 
    Rate this comment: 12345

    edburnett32
    11/07/2006
    Posts:1
    • Re: Much ado without knowing much
      Agreed. I am educated & got a better education by reading Space, the frontiers of modern defence. But, then the author diagnoses the problem well, what about the prescription? Squadron Leader KK Nair comes up with no great recommendations to contain the militarisation or weaponisation of space. Or is the situation beyond containment??? Not really. All of us could certainly work towards it. 
      Rate this comment: 12345

      anubabu
      12/03/2006
      Posts:1
  • Now, China weaponises space
    So much for crying yourself hoarse over the semantics of militarisation and weaponisation. Guess the Chinese have laid to rest your debate. No need of taking the pain of going through Space, frontiers modern....etc.
    The answers are not easy. If your Squadron Leader KK Nair could come up with great recommendations, he would have been made UN Secy general.
    All said and done, his was the only cry in the wilderness with regards to China's space weaponisation drive. Point is, where does one go from here.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Shyamsunder ...
    01/29/2007
    Posts:1
  • Lebensraum
    The recent development of the US policy on space is an old idea, perfected by the neo-conservative think-tank.
    The USA need a living space: who really is attacking the US? The Czeck, the Polish? Let us read history to know what to expect.
    This is all so offensive to the common sense of an honest mind (common sense is not appropriate in this particular case, we should say "bon sens", the "common" here being obviously not the "good")
    Cheers,
    Yunastic
    Rate this comment: 12345

    yunastic
    03/09/2007
    Posts:2

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Brain Imaging and IQ
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Featured Content
Sponsored by:
White Papers

Twelve ways to reduce costs with SQL Server 2008
Find out how to reduce costs and get more efficient

Download

Total Economic Impact of SQL Server 2008 Upgrade
Forrester reports on increasing productivity and management capabilities

Download 

Achieving Cost and Resource Savings with UC
How Office Communications Server R2 and Exchange Server can make your business smarter and more efficient

Download 
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.