Communications

Palm's Life Line

What can Palm's tumultuous history tell us about the future of the mobile device market?

  • Wednesday, December 7, 2005
  • By John Gartner

Palm is nine years old, and for its first four years, it lived a charmed life. It created the market for personal digital assistants and dominated that market. Then things got interesting: Competition from hardware and software companies loosened Palm’s grip on the PDA, while at the same time the overall market for technology collapsed. Finally, the ascendance of the smartphone forced Palm to consider the possibility that its handhelds were destined to become a thing of the past.

These combined forces of competition, recession, and the changing nature of what a PDA is have forced Palm to make big, seemingly counterintuitive changes to its business model almost as a matter of course.

Consequently, Palm’s short, eventful history serves as a useful guide to the factors that have shaped, and will continue to shape, the market for PDAs. Here, then, is a chronology of Palm in two parts. Today, we will cover 1996 to 2004. Tomorrow: 2005 and beyond.

Advertisement

1996-2000: Creating a Market

In 1996, the Palm Pilot ushered in the era of the PDA. While other companies, such as Apple (with its Newton), had tried and failed to build a following for their handhelds, within two years of the Palm Pilot's arrival, Palm was doing more than one-quarter billion dollars in annual sales. By 2000, the company had garnered 65 percent of the 11.2 million-units market for handhelds (here defined as a non-phone device), according to analyst firm Gartner (no relation to the author). Palm’s steady march of increasingly sophisticated handhelds, including the Palm Pilot and Palm III, V, and VII, all featuring the Palm operating system, eventually turned the company into a billion-dollar-a-year business.

Mobile professionals clamored to buy the latest edition of Palm's handhelds. "There was a unique moment in time where Palm was the poster child for the Internet generation,” says Palm's senior vice president Ken Wirt. “Palm was super red hot...but nobody ever stayed that hot for long.”

2001 to 2003: Suffering Losses

Indeed, Palm couldn't keep generating the heat. Its dominance vanished as devices such as the Handspring Visor and Research In Motion's BlackBerry entered the market. And it wasn’t just hardware that posed a threat: Compaq, Hewlett-Packard, and other PC makers chose to license Microsoft's competing PocketPC operating system instead of the Palm OS for their handheld devices.

In March 2001, Palm announced that it would sell the m500 and color m505 handhelds, featuring expansion slots for adding peripherals, but the devices were delayed by several months. Palm had prematurely announced the products “to steal some thunder” from rising handheld competitor Handspring, according to Todd Kort, a principal analyst with Gartner. (Handspring was founded by former Palm executives Jeff Hawkins and Donna Dubinsky.)

Print

Related Articles

A Smart Phone Built on Web Tools

Palm's new smart phone targets Web developers as well as a loyal fan base.

Jeff Hawkins Q&A

The father of mobile computing discusses artificial intelligence and how our brains work with the editor in chief of Technology Review.

Handhelds of Tomorrow

Think thumb keyboards and portable hard drives--not the overhyped notions of cell phone Web browsers and "pen-based computing."

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Guest (Ronald)

  • 2261 Days Ago
  • 12/07/2005

Palm Zire

Excellent article. though I might like a combined PDA &amp cellphone, the screens are too small on cell phones to be of much use. Put together a flip-phone with a big enough screen, and youve got something.

Reply

Guest (Ronald)

  • 2261 Days Ago
  • 12/07/2005

Palm Zire

Excellent article. though I might like a combined PDA &amp cellphone, the screens are too small on cell phones to be of much use. Put together a flip-phone with a big enough screen, and youve got something.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Silver Spring Networks

Crowdcast

Pacific Biosciences

First Solar

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement