Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Hoping for a Solar Breakthrough

The CEO of Eni would like to see new, cheaper solar technologies.

By David Rotman

Friday, May 07, 2010

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

As CEO of Eni, the Italian oil and natural gas giant, Paolo Scaroni heads one of the world's largest petroleum companies. Eni's commercial portfolio of energy technologies does not currently include solar power, but Scaroni came to MIT this week with an eye on longer-term opportunities, helping to officially open the Eni-MIT Solar Frontiers Center.

Eni’s CEO Paolo Scaroni.
Credit: Justin Knight

Eni has committed $50 million to MIT energy research, including $25 million for the solar center, which was originally announced in 2008. And Scaroni was clearly interested in seeing what the company was getting for its money. On display were the center's recent inventions, including the first solar cell printed on paper. Scaroni said he believes that existing alternative-energy technologies are not yet ready for wide-scale deployment, and that eventual success in replacing petroleum will depend on the development of new technologies and devices. "If only 10 percent of what I have seen [at the MIT center] materializes," he suggested, "it would change the world."

After Scaroni toured the MIT labs, Technology Review's editor, David Rotman, asked him what opportunities and challenges he sees with renewable energies.

TR: You don't think solar power is ready to make a significant impact in replacing petroleum?

Paolo Scaroni: I'm not very familiar with U.S. numbers. I'm more familiar with the European numbers. In order to make commercially sellable solar energy, you have to pay, depending on the country and the situation, between four and six times what you pay for thermal energy. Which means that if in a European country all the electricity comes from solar, the bill would be between four to six times higher than it is today.

TR: So it's not economically practical?

PS: No, it is not practical, with the price of the technology.

TR: Eni currently has no existing business in solar power.

PS: Solar energy in the world is less than 1 percent. So it is still really a minute number.

TR: You're waiting for a breakthrough?

PS: We need a breakthrough. And I think the breakthrough will be around replacing silicon. Silicon is expensive, heavy, and has a conversion of around 12 percent, which is not bad. But if we can improve it, it would change completely the whole commercial perspective. There is also the problem of density, because you need to cover a large surface to produce a fairly small amount of energy [with solar power]. When you have a thermal power station, with a small surface area, you produce a lot of energy.

TR: Do you think, however, that consumers will be willing to pay more for alternative energies?

PS: I'm not sure about that. Of course, it depends very much on the price of oil. Cheap oil is the biggest enemy of renewables. We need to have a price of oil which is in the region of $80, $90 a barrel to make the price of renewables acceptable--still expensive but acceptable. Of course, if oil prices go to $30 a barrel, then renewables would be killed.

Story continues below


TR: Any other alternative energies besides solar that interest you?

PS: In some countries wind is certainly a good alternative. But of course to produce wind energy, you need wind. People tend to forget you need constant wind for many hours a day. And normally in the countries or in the regions where you have a lot of constant wind, there is not a lot of population because people don't like to live in places where there is a lot of wind. So you have the additional problem of transporting the electricity from where you produce it to where you use it. But where you have constant wind, such as places like the U.K., Spain, some parts of Denmark, wind is an alternative. But the key issue around all renewables is storage. If we don't solve the problem of storage, we're going nowhere. Solar is fantastic but what happens during the night or what happens if you have no sun? So storage research is key.

Comments

  • Nice Interview
    Good questions and good honest answers.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Mapou
    05/07/2010
    Posts:209
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Re: Nice Interview
      It is fitting that one company announced today that they have received their US Patent for technology that reduces silicon usage by up to 66% and allows for the use of tandem solar cells that could double or even triple output in the same physical space. Get ready for the next generation folks. Natcore Solar's joint venture with the Chinese has been announced and finalization is imminent.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      RiverRound...
      05/10/2010
      Posts:3
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • balderdash
    Standard fare from someone that is threatened by the ubiquity of sources and price reductions that PV is going through.

    Rate this comment: 12345

    fllev
    05/07/2010
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Re: balderdash
      Exactly!! It's not the cost of oil, it's the polution of air,ground and water from burning and producing it that creates the need to stop using it. People who make money, big money, from oil and gas are not situated to make money from renewable energy yet.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Donnio
      05/07/2010
      Posts:2
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • Re: balderdash
        One more thought. They, people connected to oil and gas, would love nothing more than to stop renewable energy DEAD in it's tracks!!!
        Rate this comment: 12345

        Donnio
        05/07/2010
        Posts:2
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
        • Re: balderdash
          Two years ago I would have agreed with you. Now I believe we are further over the bell curve for big oil's acceptance of the shape their industry is truely in. Look at Exxon's $600 Million investment in Algae research. They see the hand writing on the wall and know that regardless of what renewables do, they will still sell every drop of oil they can squeeze from the good mother earth. Renewables are no longer a threat to them.
          Rate this comment: 12345

          RiverRound...
          05/10/2010
          Posts:3
          Avg Rating:
          3/5
          • Re: balderdash
            well said. oil is not evil - it is simply the most cost effective solution. when renewables become the most cost effective, they will take over. there are few, if any, "oil" companies left - almost all of them are "energy" companies now. they've seen that handwriting and are moving out. that does not mean they are "green" or altruistic - they are looking to make profit, and some do not care about being good corporate citizens or about waste, as long as they get theirs. but they have almost all seen the end of the tunnel on fossil fuels, and they know that those hydrocarbons are on the verge of becoming too valuable to other industries to simply burn.
            Rate this comment: 12345

            smithsomia...
            06/09/2010
            Posts:168
            Avg Rating:
            3/5
    • Re: balderdash
      Aside from hydro, renewable energy is extremely high priced compared to carbon-based and nuclear power. Balderdash, indeed.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      jhains2
      05/08/2010
      Posts:11
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • Alas
    Things tend to happen to the degree that they pay to happen.
    Oil companies do not pay for all the cost of oil, such as health effects from smog, wars and destruction of the environment.  The real cost is not reflected in the direct price.  We knowingly pay that price.
    Who knows though, perhaps more lives have been saved in a world with oil than a world without it? It is ugly and dirty, but the shit works great for so much.  Oil is part of nature, here long before humans.  Maybe we would not have killed as many people if there was no oil; but maybe even more (perhaps myself) would never have lived? Tis a fickle world, yes?
    I hope for a clean energy breakthrough too.  I hate being dependent on corrupt governments and corporations, but alas, I am.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    StupidPeas...
    05/08/2010
    Posts:73
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Alas
      use of oil primarily displaced the use of coal as an energy source. The environmental cost of oil is low compared to the cost of coal. Please buy a horse.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      jhains2
      05/08/2010
      Posts:11
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
    • Re: Alas
      You're joking or trolling right? Take away oil and you will die. Easily half the population of the world simply would not exist without this cheap, abundant energy source. The fact that we've shitted our cage with the stuff by now has to be dealt with (Thorium breeder reactors plus better batteries being my hope), but to even ask the question about whether oil helped is crazy and ignorant.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      GaryB
      05/09/2010
      Posts:102
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • Replacing silicon?
    It's interesting that he's in the "let's replace silicon" camp, while there seems to be an equally (if not more) persuasive argument for "silicon is the way to go." Aren't all of the possible replacements for silicon (i.e. Cd, Te, In, Ga, etc for thin film cells) comparatively very rare and much more expensive? Moreover, the specific problem that silicon has of requiring thick cells to have a decent photocurrent can possibly be addressed with plasmonics, as TR has reported. http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/25083/page1/

    Guess he didn't talk to any plasmonics folks over at MIT...
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Globe99
    05/09/2010
    Posts:21
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: Replacing silicon?
      At least on solution already exist. See my post at Re: Nice Interview above. This is cause for great (and immediate) optimism.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      RiverRound...
      05/10/2010
      Posts:3
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
    • Re: Replacing silicon?
      Know much about silicon? Ever studied SOI (silicon-on-insulator)? Think of it as super wafers with very flexible properties. How about MEMS? If used correctly and most of the research is close to public domain, these masters of silicon can do amazing things. The properties of both thick film (Think cookie with frosting) and thin film (molecular deposition on substrate) can accomplish technical feats that would be, in my opinion, near impossible with any other material and this technology is proven, used daily and highly repeatable. (Applied Materials stuff). Application is whats missing. Just need a few more visionaries that know the potential and how to maximize it. Can be EMF resistant, very temperature effective and is in mass manufacturing right now. How and what can possibly replace immediately is far too costly to spend vast amounts of funds and time on when we can do so much more with what we have. It got us to where we are today, think last 30 years to todays technologies including solar. Research is great but many more applications with todays base technologies that we know work. The grass is not always greener once you get there. Smarter houses with better materials is the answer. Got a few weeks to discuss it?
      Rate this comment: 12345

      2far2stop
      05/12/2010
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • Good grief
    Why are those who perhaps truly believe that most things involving mankind are bad, usually avoiding most of the facts (and reality for that matter)?  Business looks out for business interests as a priority, but wouldn't throw nature under the bus if it cost them either directly or indirectly through image or reputation.  Extraction and refining of oil, statistically, is very safe for workers and the environment.   Accidents happen, and the one in the gulf happens to be massive.  But, it is much easier just to label all things corporate as "evil" and "malicious" looking to take full advantage of "the people".

    I seriously believe that opposition believes in their heart either:
    1) It would be perfectly fine for electricity to be very expensive, with subsidies for those who couldn't afford it, to discourage use and "force" mankind to behave in a way they find acceptable (such as only using approved generation methods).  If there were periods of brownouts - say when wind is scarce, it is overcast, and/or enough organic material cannot be converted for biomass fuel - that would be fine, too.
    Or, 2) Mankind should not be successful to such a degree, perhaps drop radically in population, and become mostly subservient to "nature".  All the "bad" in nature is due to man in this view (ingnoring, of course millennia of devastating natural events). 

    Either is silly.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    casualobse...
    05/10/2010
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: Good grief
      If you find those views silly, perhaps you should consider some in depth discussions with people that are serious about alternative energy.  You might find that it's your beliefs about them that are less than well thought out.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      pjduncan
      05/10/2010
      Posts:17
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      • Re: Good grief
        Try to talk to those people? I'm 62 years old and have been trying to talk to those people for 40 years.  There is no talking to those (true believers) people. They would rather sit at home in the dark and Freeze.  If this weren't true we'd have 100 new 1GW fission plants under construction.

        The planet need energy to be as nearly free as possible. That, combined with social and economic Liberty will result in good times for all.

        "We will make electricity so cheap only the rich can afford to burn candles" - George Westinghouse.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        Shootist
        05/14/2010
        Posts:31
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
        • Re: Goo grief
          "Nature and nature's law lay hidden in the night
          God said "Let Tesla be" and all was light"*
          *B.A. Behrens 1910
          we should be thankful some oil producers are interested in altenative energies, though some  suspect a love/hate attraction exists, there is an entire industry, born when Mr Westinghouse bought Nikki Tesla's patent, started wiring population centers and attaching meters everywhere wires went....preoccupations of these folks looms over the quest for renewable energy, it would be somewhat unnatural where this not to be.

          before curbing his curiosity to applying electricity to turbines and other practical devices, Tesla believed that the entire earth could be used as a conductor, tapping a cosmic never ending source of energy, excerpted from a presentation "Experiments with Alternate Currents of Very High Frequency and Their Application to Methods of Artificial Illumination 05/20/1891"

          "Eminent scientists consider the problem of utilizing one kind of radiation without the others a rational one. In an apparatus designed for the production of light by conversion from any form of energy into that of light, such a result can never be reached, for no matter what the process of producing the required vibrations, be it electrical, chemical or any other, it will not be possible to obtain the higher light vibrations without going through the lower heat vibrations. It is the problem of imparting to a body a certain velocity without passing through all lower velocities. But there is a possibility of obtaining energy not only in the form of light, but motive power, and energy of any other form, in some more direct way from the medium. The time will be when this will be accomplished, and the time has come when one may utter such words before an enlightened audience without being considered a visionary. We are whirling through endless space with an inconceivable speed, all around us everything is spinning, everything is moving, everywhere is energy."

          Preliminary observations intimate that Tesla's experimentation went a lot farther than historiography credits, in Nikki's day there were no orbiting observatories, scientific platforms, to observe, confirm results of his projects.

          In 1891 Annie Oakley, traveling through Europe, performing shooting exhibitions in Buffalo Bill Cody's Wild West Show, when Kaiser Wilhelm, so the story goes, in the audience saw her shoot the ash from a cigarette her husband held with his lips, the future monarch of Germany was impressed so much so he offered to do likewise, she insisted he hold the cigarette in his hand, which she put out with a rifle shot in front of a cheering, lit up crowd....to be contd.
          Rate this comment: 12345

          Asclaepius
          06/06/2010
          Posts:24
          Avg Rating:
          3/5
      • Re: Good grief
        I'm having trouble believing that anyone would NOT find Luddite views like those silly. there are certainly a lot of lessons that we should have learned by now about waste and stewardship (and have not), but to hold the view that need to throw away the advances that have increased lifespans and quality of life is just crazy talk.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        smithsomia...
        06/09/2010
        Posts:168
        Avg Rating:
        3/5

Resources

Events

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

How to Make Robotic Hands
Sponsored by
More videos »
Technology Review September/October 2010

Current Issue

The TR35
Our annual selection of the world's top innovators under the age of 35.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.