Concentrated Solar Set to ShineLarge investment could jump-start concentrated photovoltaic deployments.
A California-based startup, Amonix>, has received $129 million in venture-capital investments to further its commercialization of concentrated photovoltaic technology. The company's product combines powerful lenses, a tracking system, and solar cells for large, highly efficient solar-power installations. The funding could give the company, and the emerging field of concentrated photovoltaics, the boost it needs for widespread utility-scale deployments.
"We've looked at 100 solar companies in the last 18 months, and Amonix is the one that stood out to us as having breakout potential," says Ben Kortlang, a partner at venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, which led the recent investment. Amonix recently launched its newest solar concentrator, which converts one fourth of the sunlight that falls on it into AC electricity. That's compared with the approximately 18 percent system efficiency--including inverters that convert solar's DC power to useable AC power--of the most efficient photovoltaic systems that don't use special optics or track the sun. To collect sunlight as efficiently as possible, Amonix starts with a massive 23.5-meter-by-15-meter array. The array is covered with thin, plastic Fresnel lenses, each measuring 350 square centimeters, that focus sunlight to an area that's .7 square centimeters. The sunlight, concentrated to 500 times its normal intensity, hits an ultra-efficient multi-junction solar cell that converts 39 percent of the light into electricity. The cell, made bySpectrolab, is the most efficient in the world, demonstrating more than 41 percent efficiency in lab tests. To further enhance performance, Amonix uses a tracking system that keeps the lenses pointed within .8 degrees of the angle of the sun throughout the day. Utility companies, however, have been reluctant to invest in any concentrated photovoltaic systems due in part to the device's high level of complexity. Proper functioning of each component is crucial because the lenses require very precise alignment with the sun in order to focus light on the solar cells. "The difference between being in alignment and being one degree off is the entire system works or it doesn't," says Johanna Schmidtke, an analyst with Lux Research. Amonix's technology already accounts for some 13 megawatts of installed capacity, which represents more than half of all installed concentrated photovoltaic capacity in the world. And so long as Amonix can prove its reliability, its technology offers several distinct environmental advantages over other types of utility-scale solar. Concentrated solar power--solar thermal systems that use highly concentrated sunlight to create steam that drives electric turbines--has begun to run afoul of environmental regulations because they typically require vast amounts of water. In contrast, concentrated photovoltaics don't require water to generate electricity and, because of their high efficiency, they don't blanket large swaths of land. The recent venture capital funding will allow Amonix to scale up manufacturing, and perhaps more importantly, will strengthen the company's balance sheet. "If you are going to be a supplier to the utility industry, you have to be a well-capitalized company that can stand behind its deployments," Kortlang says. |
» Are Genetically Modified Salmon Headed to the Supermarket?



Comments
http://www.stirlingenergy.com/technology.htm
And, being modular, a field of these starts producing electricity as soon as you hook up one of the modular elements, instead of waiting till expensive construction is completed on towers, and a whole field of mirrors.
It's pretty stupid to use vast quantities of water in desert areas, environmental regulations or not. you then have to get the water, pump it, take it away from other uses and NOT use areas with vast potential for sunlight if no water is available. Even these plants could be designed to recycle the water with the proper condensers but that is a bit more expensive. I mean your car doesn't use 100 gallons every few miles like steam locomotives used to. you have a radiator and the fluid is recycled.
The upside to using solar towers is, unlike modular, you can incorporate an insulated heat storage tank holding whatever the heat transfer medium is, e.g. molten salts, to keep producing electricity to end of peak hour, increasing payoff by matching use curve better.
erbium
04/29/2010
Posts:218
The article is about concentrated PV, not concentrated solar for heating water into steam.
Devere
05/05/2010
Posts:28
'because they use vast amounts of water' in the page above.
Did YOU bother to read the article?
erbium
05/06/2010
Posts:218
aunderdown
04/29/2010
Posts:47
honzik
04/29/2010
Posts:14
IronGoober
04/29/2010
Posts:3
dcmeserve
04/29/2010
Posts:9
One would suspect it's a cost/benefit problem. Ultra high efficiency solar cells are very expensive, plastic lens are cheap.
Ultimately the question is not efficiency, it's cost per kilowatt and durability.
But then i'm just a chemist, not an engineer.
senojjones
04/29/2010
Posts:3
Kishmei
04/29/2010
Posts:1
SkylineSolar has a cheaper concentrator that is only 10 or 20x, but has a good ROI.
suejonez
04/30/2010
Posts:5
I wonder how the plastic lenses would age in harsh desert sunlight. These facilities are supposed to last for decades, after all. The plastic would also get abraded by dust more than glass mirrors.
jlredford
04/30/2010
Posts:2
IMHO, this approach seems awfully complicated in a world where I predict that simplicity will rule. Anyone who has ever lived in a sunny climate knows that all plastics fall apart over the years due to UV. Glass survives, however. And then there's the automatic tracking mechanism and controls that passive panels don't need.
In this technology's favor, however, is the fact that it doesn't need water. Not needing water will turn out to be a price of entry for any concentrating solar. Think about it: any concentrating solar MUST be sited in a location where water is scarce - clouds of any kind kill performance. Hence, any concentrating solar that needs water is really a non-starter!
May they find a way to get the reliability up and cost down - Good luck to them!
FreddyG
04/30/2010
Posts:16
ashrocks
04/30/2010
Posts:3
longhorn
05/02/2010
Posts:3
markcox
05/03/2010
Posts:1
bj
05/04/2010
Posts:44
blowing silica (sand particles) around a mirror is likely to scratch it. Is the same hardness as glass (made of silica) so will scratch.
using water reduces scratching a whole lot.
erbium
05/04/2010
Posts:218
It is nuclear power that requires vast amounts of water.
CSP (solar thermal)uses some water to wash mirrors, but this need not be much at all. Modern car washes recycle filtered water, very little is lost. This is simple technology, surely not beyond the power of the minds at MIT to comprehend.
Perhaps some writers are overly influenced by the red herrings drawn across their path by the PR department of PV industry???
CSP (solar thermal)is simpler, cheaper, more reliable than PV, and produces more power for longer hours with cheaper storage (in any commercial scale application, home rooftop scale not included).
The SEGS power plants at Kramer Junction CA consists of 9 plants built 20-26 years ago, they have NEVER broken down, they have NEVER failed to meet their designed capacity.
Check it out here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_Energy_Generating_Systems
Newer CSP (solar thermal) plants are even better.
mauisurfer
05/05/2010
Posts:1
The thing that isn't being explained is 'steam engineering'. All our systems to date, heat water, wtr expands across turbine blades, condenses back to wtr, heat wtr, etc.
The nature of wtr/steam is 1 BTU of energy heats 1 pound of wtr 1 degree. It heats 1 pound of steam, 1/2 degree. Any temp over 212 exiting the turbine is wasted energy in the condenser but if water is free, -ship at sea- who cares?
blue7053
05/07/2010
Posts:6
CSP is by any measure the preferred approach, and as you state,water use is a canard; recycling at levels of efficiency approaching 100% are entirely feasible.
It is critcal importance that we take the correct path before---not during or after--major investments in solar energy.
By the way, if we are looking to create jobs, let's remember that no matter what technological twists eventually are chosen for PV, they will wind up being fabricated in China, just like all simple semiconductors are today
N6FB
05/09/2010
Posts:1
I have the experience of our neighbor's flat solar collector crashing down in a stormy night.
Anyway I am sure that the solar energy techniques will improve steadily to help to overcome the energy crisis.
Jobrad
05/05/2010
Posts:4
Thanks
kkamal
05/07/2010
Posts:12
http://quatschtronauts.wordpress.com/2009/11/28/canned-sunshine/
Anyone any idea to get this vision realised?
quatschtro...
05/26/2010
Posts:5