Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Stealthy Nanoparticles Attack Cancer Cells

Drugs embedded in special polymers can more effectively shrink tumors.

By Emily Singer

Wednesday, November 04, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

In a small manufacturing space on a Cambridge, MA, street dotted with biotech companies, Greg Troiano tinkers with a series of gleaming metal vats interweaved with plastic tubes. The vats are designed to violently shake a mix of chemicals into precise nanostructures, and Troiano's task, as head of process development at start-up BIND Biosciences, is to make kilograms of the stuff--a novel drug-infused nanoparticle. The company hopes the new drug-delivery system will diminish the side effects of chemotherapy while increasing its effectiveness in killing cancer.

Cancer killers: Drug-laden nanoparticles (shown in pink) developed by BIND Biosciences have accumulated in a prostate-cancer cell (shown in green; cell nucleus in blue). The particles were designed to target prostate cancer cells. Scientists hope such particles will reduce side effects associated with chemotherapy.
Credit: BIND Biosciences
Multimedia
video  Jeff Hrkach and Greg Troiano of BIND Biosciences explain how they make drug-delivering nanoparticles.

Scientists at BIND have shown that their nanoparticles--which are not only infused with drugs but also enrobed in cancer-targeting proteins--can better stop the growth of prostate, breast and lung tumors in rodents. BIND has made particles that can remain in the bloodstream for more than a day, increasing the likelihood that the drug will reach its target tissue. It is also refining a method for making large volumes of its nanoparticle-based delivery system in preparation for clinical trials of its technology in cancer patients next year.

The company's approach is based on self-assembling polymers developed in the lab of Robert Langer, a professor of chemical engineering at MIT and a pioneer in biomaterials research. Langer founded BIND in 2006 with Omid Farokhzad, a scientist and physician at Harvard Medical School and a former postdoctoral researcher in Langer's lab.

"The idea of using nanoparticles is to lower the dose while maintaining efficacy and reducing side effects," says Piotr Grodzinski, director of the Nanotechnology for Cancer Programs at the National Cancer Institute, in Bethesda, MD. Grodzinski said in some cases the nanoparticles could be used to increase the dose while reducing toxicity. This is especially important for chemotherapeutics, which often must be administered in high doses that result in severe side effects--so severe that some patients choose to forgo the treatment.

A few existing drugs and a number in development use lipid-based nanoparticles and other technologies to extend the lifespan of the drug in the bloodstream, allowing more of the compound to reach the target tissue through the blood vessels. But none have yet both targeted the drug to the desired cells and boosted its circulation time.

Story continues below


The core of BIND's nanoparticle is made up of biodegradable polymers PLA (polylactic acid) and PLGA (copolylactic acid/glycolic acid), which hold the desired drug in a molecular mesh, allowing it to slowly diffuse. The outer layer is made of polyethylene glycol, a molecule with water-like properties that lets the nanoparticle evade detection by proteins and the white blood cells that eat pathogens in the blood. That stealth coating is also dotted with specially designed peptides that bind to the cell of interest, delivering the particle's payload.

When the three components are mixed together under carefully controlled chemical conditions, the structured nanoparticles form spontaneously. "Because the self assembly doesn't require multiple complicated chemical steps, the particles are very easy to manufacture," says Farokhzad. "And we can make them on a kilogram scale, which no one else has done." In most other targeted nanotechnologies, the core particle is made first and later coated with the targeting molecule, a more complex process that can be difficult to precisely repeat.

Comments

  • Fantastic!
    This is great news! Everyone has had relatives succomb to cancer or survive difficult courses of chemo. This brings hope to millions.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    MakeSense
    11/04/2009
    Posts:99
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • stealthy nanoparticles attack ca
    This is exciting. The gordian knot will be the sensitivity and specificity of the drug. I'm a little unclear on how the drug seeks out only cancer cells, and not healthy cells. Especially, if the concentration increases 20 times that may be a problem.

    Also, there is the efficiency issue. No one cancer is alike, each colon cancer is unique in itself.

    Another issue is the changing genetic character of the orgininal cancer, in that they generally progress to more toxic forms over time. 

    Regardless, this as well as other similar research targeting specific cancer cells would be a great benefit for treatment.

    The last issue is political... will the government pay for it or decide that if one is over a certain age, it will not be considerd to be cost effective. I call it the creeping Eugenics II movement.

    I think back to the beginning of the march to cure childhood leukemia. The first drug, was only marginally effective, but increased survival 3 to six months, but subsequent durgs and research eventully found the right treatment to cure the kiddies.

    Will that be possible today? "Will the research be immediately cut off after trying only the first drug?

    It sends a shiver up my spine.

    Ron Hansing M.D.


    Rate this comment: 12345

    rhansing
    11/04/2009
    Posts:40
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: stealthy nanoparticles attack ca
      Ron,

      As stated in the article, the outer shell of each drug particle is polyethylene glycol, and on this outer shell are a sparse number of peptides. These peptides are designed such that they only bind to the diseased cell. So the targeting is done by including the appropriate peptides for the specific type of cancer into the manufacturing process. I don't know anything about peptides and binding, but it seems like it is a relatively common practice in biochemistry.

      It seems that simple modification of the peptides will allow them to rapidly target new cancers, and possibly create patient specific drugs.

      It would appear that the real break through is the circulation times. This dramatically increases the particles probability of actually finding a cancer cell. Once they are bound together then it is only a matter of time for the drugs to diffuse from the particle to the cell and kill the cancer cell.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      ssintay
      11/04/2009
      Posts:7
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • cancer
    The real problems in cancer treatment are resistance and metastasis. Many tumors respond to initial treatments only to come roaring back resistant to it. Most people are killed by mets not the primary tumor mass. So unless nano technology addresses these problems it is just a fancy way to deliver current anti-cancer chemotherapeutic agents. The clinical trials, if they get that far will be very telling. Monoclonal antibodies hooked to toxins  were supposed to be selectively lethal to tumor cells but never realized their hype.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    irreverent
    11/05/2009
    Posts:12
    Avg Rating:
    4/5

Resources

Events

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.