Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

High-Energy Batteries Coming to Market

Rechargeable zinc-air batteries can store three times the energy of a lithium-ion battery.

By Kevin Bullis

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

A Swiss company says it has developed rechargeable zinc-air batteries that can store three times the energy of lithium ion batteries, by volume, while costing only half as much. ReVolt, of Staefa, Switzerland, plans to sell small "button cell" batteries for hearing aids starting next year and to incorporate its technology into ever larger batteries, introducing cell-phone and electric bicycle batteries in the next few years. It is also starting to develop large-format batteries for electric vehicles.

Battery unpacked: This graphic illustrates the multilayered structure of a ReVolt rechargeable zinc-air battery. From top to bottom: the battery cover, which lets in air; a porous air electrode; the interface between electrodes; the zinc electrode; the casing.
Credit: ReVolt

The battery design is based on technology developed at SINTEF, a research institute in Trondheim, Norway. ReVolt was founded to bring it to market and so far has raised 24 million euros in investment. James McDougall, the company's CEO, says that the technology overcomes the main problem with zinc-air rechargeable batteries--that they typically stop working after relatively few charges. If the technology can be scaled up, zinc-air batteries could make electric vehicles more practical by lowering their costs and increasing their range.

Unlike conventional batteries, which contain all the reactants needed to generate electricity, zinc-air batteries rely on oxygen from the atmosphere to generate current. In the late 1980s they were considered one of the most promising battery technologies because of their high theoretical energy-storage capacity, says Gary Henriksen, manager of the electrochemical energy storage department at Argonne National Laboratory in Illinois. The battery chemistry is also relatively safe because it doesn't require volatile materials, so zinc-air batteries are not prone to catching fire like lithium-ion batteries.

Story continues below


Because of these advantages, nonrechargeable zinc-air batteries have long been on the market. But making them rechargeable has been a challenge. Inside the battery, a porous "air" electrode draws in oxygen and, with the help of catalysts at the interface between the air and a water-based electrolyte, reduces it to form hydroxyl ions. These travel through an electrolyte to the zinc electrode, where the zinc is oxidized--a reaction that releases electrons to generate a current. For recharging, the process is reversed: zinc oxide is converted back to zinc and oxygen is released at the air electrode. But after repeated charge and discharge cycles, the air electrode can become deactivated, slowing or stopping the oxygen reactions. This can be due, for example, to the liquid electrolyte being gradually pulled too far into the pores, Henriksen says. The battery can also fail if it dries out or if zinc builds up unevenly, forming branch-like structures that create a short circuit between the electrodes.

Comments

  • Sounds very interesting but . . .
    . . . it's a very very long way from a button cell for hearing aids to a large capacity EV battery. The slurry pumping from one part of the battery to another - actually sounds quite ingenious. But it's so novel that I can see a lot of problems to work out in mass production. I would be very surprised to see a zinc air bicycle battery in five years. Whereas we'll be seeing large cell lithium EV batteries in cars like the Volt and the Nissan Leaf in only about a year. In five years lithium will probably have developed substantially and it's energy and current capacities and longevity increase, charge times decrease, etc.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ArtInvent
    10/28/2009
    Posts:28
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: Sounds very interesting but . . .
      The primary problem with Lithium, other than the whole "explosion" bit, is it's limited.

      The biggest reserves are in Bolivia.

      In five years, we'll have much better lithium technology.  And we'll be hurting for lithium.

      This Zinc/Air battery tech could make for a handy backup plan.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Jkirk3279
      10/31/2009
      Posts:4
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
  • hurry!
    Good bit of news!  Now hurry up and make a practical EV battery so we can stop sending all our money to the middle east dictators.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jpm1u
    10/28/2009
    Posts:11
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • temperature range
    If use liquid, temperature would be a problem.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    DeepOcean
    10/28/2009
    Posts:3
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: temperature range
      Liquid?

      That depends on WHICH liquid.   Something that doesn't freeze until minus 40C would work.

      Pure ethanol freezes at -114C
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Jkirk3279
      10/31/2009
      Posts:4
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
  • [no subject]
    A few hundred cycles is not going to cut it for a vehicle battery.  Also if you read "hearing aid" , read that as "expensive" 
    Rate this comment: 12345

    gceder
    10/29/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re:
      A few hundred cycles is indeed enough for an EV. As these batteries have greater energy densities than lithium batteries, cars with 300+ mile ranges should be possible.  300 miles times 400 charges is 120,000 miles. And according to the article, parts of the batteries can be replaced after this - not entire batteries.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      stockinbug
      11/01/2009
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • Zinc slurry batteries
    I've been hearing about how the zinc slurry battery would replace the IC engine for nearly 4 decades. I am at a loss to explain as to why this would take this long to make such small progress.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    xs400
    10/30/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Zinc slurry batteries
      Easy.   Cheap Gasoline.

      With gasoline being such a good energy carrier, and relatively cheap, there wasn't much impetus to develop the alternatives.

      Where did you hear about a zinc slurry battery 40 years ago?

      Did you also read something that week about a guy who found a way to network computers together over phone lines ?  :)
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Jkirk3279
      10/31/2009
      Posts:4
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
  • more importantly
    It dilutes the Li resource risk. I suspect that Zn is available in larger volumes and is more accessible globally than Li.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    asogan
    10/30/2009
    Posts:9
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: more importantly
      Correct.   The USA and Australia have good reserves of Zinc, and it's more common in the Earth's crust than Lithium.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Jkirk3279
      10/31/2009
      Posts:4
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
    • Li resource risk is myth
      "we only have 10 years of Li left"
      is because when you have 10 years you don't go looking for more.  The exact same thing happend with oil 50 years ago.  Only now are we starting to pass peak oil.  There are still are larg reserves, but each barrel now takes a good part of and ever increasing fraction of  a barrel in energy and costs to extract.

      Billions are being invested in extraction plants,
      outside of bolivia and their peasants would likely be less revolting (a revolution approximately every year) if they had jobs mining salt flats for Lithium.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      erbium
      11/05/2009
      Posts:110
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • says it has developed
    "Says it has developed," I would love to see a working prototype. If they can get it right, there is big money in store for them.
    Brian Glassman
    Ph.D in Innovation Management from Purdue University
    Rate this comment: 12345

    briang1621
    10/30/2009
    Posts:121
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Alternative Fuel Cells
    This raises the possibility of exploring other fuel cell chemistries. A battery that can "burn" a fuel using air as an oxidizer has great potential in making electric propulsion a practical reality.

    The ability to recharge is not a requirement if an external reducing system is possible.  The advantage that only half the problem (discharging) must be solved in a compact device demands more attention to this approach. Ironically, hydrogen as a fuel seems a rather poor choice to pursue considering the storage problem.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    TooMany
    11/01/2009
    Posts:47
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Storing hydrogen is simple
      we have trillions of gallons of hydrogen stored so safely we even put out fires with it.

      Why would you even WANT to store more than a little free hydrogen given its flammability?

      Reducing metals as others mentioned is the easiest way to produce hydrogen on demand.

      Al + H20 -> Aluminum oxide plus hydrogen to fuel your car.  Aluminum reacts with water at room temperature (really, powdered aluminum is incredibly reactive) in presence of gallium which keeps a surface film of aluminum oxide from froming)

      a tank full of aluminum pellets and 35 gallons of water would give you 300+ miles range in a car and you could exchange your used up oxide slurry for new pellets at a refueling station.  aluminum is the 7th most abundant element in the crust and we have vast efficient plants that make aluminum from oxide ore. the electricity from the grid used to reform the oxide back to aluminum to put back in your car can be from any source including renewable.


      http://www.fuelcellsworks.com/Supppage7355.html

      same process can be done using magnesium instead of aluminum in a small reactor at temps around standard car engine temps:
      http://www.techbriefs.com/component/content/article/3498

      http://www.physorg.com/news98556080.html

      the hydrogen can be burned in an internal combustion engine

      or

      in a fuel cell, converted directly to electricity to drive the car

      the fuel cell option is twice as efficient as the internal combustion engine so less fuel taken and range extended
      Rate this comment: 12345

      erbium
      11/05/2009
      Posts:110
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • zinc-air battery for EVs
    Batteries for electric vehicles have requirements that are different than other applications such as PCs, PDAs, hearing aids, etc.

    1. Safety -  Battery pack must be designed with safety as the primary concern in the event of crash and/or a "thermal event" in a cell. The more immune the cell chemistry is to explosion, leaking dangerous chemicals, etc., the easier it is to design the battery pack. For small battery systems this is much easier than for massive EV battery systems.

    2. Cost - the overall cost of a battery pack is the key to making EVs a reality. Today's EV battery technologies run from $250/kW-h for AGM batteries to $1000/kW-h for Li-ion. EVs become practical when the cost approaches the AGM pricing. Keep in mind that these are system prices, not cell prices. System includes BMS, packaging, etc. for EV.

    3. Power - EVs require a lot of power capability for acceleration and fast charging. The ideal battery should support 20C or more in both directions continuous.

    4. Specific energy - EV batteries need to have high specific energy in both volume and weight. This is why AGM batteries are only good enough for golf carts and not full size EVs. Size and weight of the battery system really matter when car designers are trying to fit the battery into the volumes available in a car.

    5. Cycle life - EV batteries need to last the life of the car. That means 10 years/150k miles. 10 years of recharging once a day = 3560 recharge cycles. If a cell can do that at 100% DOD, it's a winner. However, most cannot so battery packs have to be designed so that the batteries experience a much lower DOD, like 60%. This results in batteries that are larger, heavier, and more expensive than are actually required for the application. Chevy Volt is an example: it has a 16kW-h battery of which only 8kW-h is used day-to-day in order to prolong its life.

    My last comment is that virtually all cells that are available on the market today have been developed for the portable electronics industry. The portable electronics industry cares a lot about doubling the specific energy but doesn't care at all about cost since the battery represents a small part of the overall cost of the device. Car manufacturers, on the other hand, care a lot about cost because the battery is so large that it represents a substantial part of the cost of an EV. Cell manufacturers who want to be successful in the EV industry need to focus on radically driving down costs.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    mharrigan
    11/06/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5

Resources

Events

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.