Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Is China Beating the U.S. in Clean Tech?

The president of NRDC points to a growing investment by China in energy technologies.

By Kevin Bullis

Friday, October 09, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

China could beat the United States in a race to deploy clean energy technology that can reduce greenhouse-gas emissions, said Frances Beinecke, leader of a leading environmental group, speaking this week at MIT.

Credit: Technology Review

"I just got back from China, where there is tremendous investment in the clean tech sector," said Beinecke, the president of the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). "They have a national renewable energy standard, a national efficiency standard, and China will build more of everything--more coal, more nuclear, more renewables--and they'll invest in more efficiency than any other single country in the world."

Given the progress in China, Beinecke says the U.S. needs policy changes to compete. "There's a global race going on," she said. "We need to get moving as quickly as possible, and the best way to do that is through smart policies. We need to both pull the market and push the companies through regulation."

The comments were part of a strategy to convince Congress to enact an energy bill, and to push the United States to take a leading role in framing an international climate-change agreement this winter in Copenhagen. The NRDC hopes the climate-change legislation will pass in Congress ahead of the climate treaty meeting, or as soon thereafter as possible. A climate bill was passed by the House in May, but as congressional attention has shifted toward health care, the Senate has been slow to take up its own bill. "The world is looking for leadership from the United States," Beinecke said.

In backing the energy bill in Congress, NRDC has split from some other environmental groups, such as Friends of the Earth and Greenpeace, that have opposed the draft legislation in Congress as not going far enough to control greenhouse gases. "This legislation won't be perfect," Beinecke said. "But the point is to put a target and a timetable out there, to put a cap on carbon and begin to get capital dollars to flow into the energy sector to create a very different energy future. Nearly two million jobs could be created in America, just from the House bill."

China has increased its investment in clean technology in recent years. According to a report released in August by The Climate Group, a nonprofit group based in London that supports clean technology development, "in an incredibly short space of time China has taken the lead in the race to develop and commercialize a range of low carbon technologies." The report highlighted that China plans to produce half a million electric vehicles in 2011, and that it produces 30 percent of the world's solar panels and is the world's fourth-largest generator of wind power. A report from the British bank HSBC earlier this year noted that China's economic stimulus package invested $221 billion in technology for reducing greenhouse-gas emissions, about twice the amount invested in such technology through the U.S. economic stimulus package enacted earlier this year.

Still, China is hardly a model for addressing climate change. China recently became the world's largest producer of greenhouse-gas emissions (although the United States still leads on a per capita basis). A report from the International Energy Agency this month suggests that China's greenhouse-gas emissions will continue to increase rapidly, nearly doubling by 2030 without new, aggressive climate policies. Even with such policies, China's emissions are expected to increase in the next decades, though at a slower pace.

Comments

  • Leader in many things
    China has become a leader in many things. Increasingly in cleantech, yes, but also increasingly a leader in dirty industries and clutter. The economy has grown so fast (and will likely continue to grow at a rather feverish pace) that everything is required. Wind turbines, solar PV modules, nuclear plants, coal, petroleum. Hey, why be discriminate if you can have a porfolio of, well, everything!

    The Chinese are just doing it all!
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Siphon
    10/09/2009
    Posts:145
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • The Sputnik moment is good for the USA
    Look at this on the bright side. The Americans are lazy, complacent and irresponsible on a regular basis. However, they pull together and accomplish amazing feats once they are challenged. Think of the sputnik moment followed by moon landings.

    We need a major challenge, so I say "Go China Go!!!! More power to China!"
    Rate this comment: 12345

    gabrielg01
    10/09/2009
    Posts:402
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: The Sputnik moment is good for the USA
      In general I agree with you, but the space race could have easily been won "by the USA" if it weren't some political mis-leadership. 

      According to this documentary,
      http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sputnik/
      "we" were ready to go into space before the Russians and had superior technology to boot. 

      The reason for quotes:  it was the Germans vs the Russians.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      jpm1u
      10/09/2009
      Posts:11
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • China Problems
    China controls 97% of the 17 rare earth metals which are key to making many alternative energy devices. China is predicted that by 2012 they no longer will export any rare earth metals, instead opting to control the manufacturing of wind turbines, formable magnets, high level displays, super efficient rechargeable batteries, etc.  America is asleep at the wheel in preventing our own domestic resource development, and thus have little capability to bring rare earth metal mining back on line.  Thanks a lot ecopoliticians (for nothing)!

    Be VERY Careful of claimed quality of China made goods.  They may look pretty but underneath the venear often are cheap materials.  I just returned from an expo in China and a tour at a local facility revealved that one big company had used quality parts to pass the tests, then substituted very cheap components for production. This is rampant in China.  Note also that the longevity of components is not nearly as long as western design and produced alternatives.  One truck company makes trucks averaging a life of 5-7 years.  Of course, they're 1/3 the price.  But how much resources go into making more units to solve a long-term need?

    As for air pollution, Beijing was awful.  And this is after they moved the heavy industry away from Beijing and towards the coast (closer to Korea, Japan, and the US).

    China is beating the US in perception, but US ecopolicy actually results in an overall increase in pollution and use of resources.  Might I also remind readers that in 2003 China emitted 40 billion pounds of aerosol pollutants, 10 billion which reach North America.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    RD
    10/09/2009
    Posts:114
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: China Problems
      Well... I'm a High Schooler, so my opinion might not be very suitable. But umm... either way everyone is polluting everyone, so it doesn't really matter about pointing fingers of who pollutes more, since all the pollution that goes into the air eventually reaches other nations regardless of origin.

      Oh! And to point out one thing on clean energy, it's not entirely clean, we still have carbon footprint (think of how you get the material in the first place).
      Rate this comment: 12345

      cloudmaster1...
      10/09/2009
      Posts:3
      Avg Rating:
      2/5
  • [no subject]
    Check out the video at this link:

    http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/features.cfm?feature=2329
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jpm1u
    10/09/2009
    Posts:11
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • US vs China CO2 footprints
    US and China carbon footprints are roughly equal.
    China's population is 4x that of US, so US has higher footprint per capita, as you point out.
    HOWEVER, US GDP is 4x that of China, so US has lower footprint per $.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    dmm
    10/14/2009
    Posts:192
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • b12
    China will perform in the “green” product development world as it has done with other developing technologies in the past – that is to wait and let other more sophisticated economies and engineers develop and start to manufacture, and then copy and mimic their way onto the manufacturing front. Although not exactly “progressive”, this is really the best they can do at the current time, as they do not have creative and forward thinking talent, but do have wide-scale manufacturing capacity and infrastructure.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    alexiaalline
    10/15/2009
    Posts:3
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
  • Technology transfer to China
    There are several new low emission, high efficiency engine designs that were created in the US (one company is based in Dubai so I'm not sure where the design was done).  One,Turbine Truck engines, has gone to China because they could not find any US company willing to manufacturer it.  Of course we will import the engines from China for our big trucks.

    US capitalism shoots itself in the foot so many times and we wonder why China gets the technology.  For all of China's faults, it is still willing to try new technology and invest in it.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    JustaGuess
    10/15/2009
    Posts:5
    Avg Rating:
    5/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

The Marcellus Shale Gas Rush
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.