Solar sheets: Xunming Deng, cofounder of Xunlight, holds his company’s flexible solar modules.
Xunlight

Business

Roll-Up Solar Panels

A startup is making thin-film solar cells on flexible steel sheets.

  • Thursday, June 4, 2009
  • By Prachi Patel

Xunlight, a startup in Toledo, Ohio, has developed a way to make large, flexible solar panels. It has developed a roll-to-roll manufacturing technique that forms thin-film amorphous silicon solar cells on thin sheets of stainless steel. Each solar module is about one meter wide and five and a half meters long.

As opposed to conventional silicon solar panels, which are bulky and rigid, these lightweight, flexible sheets could easily be integrated into roofs and building facades or on vehicles. Such systems could be more attractive than conventional solar panels and be incorporated more easily into irregular roof designs. They could also be rolled up and carried in a backpack, says the company's cofounder and president, Xunming Deng. "You could take it with you and charge your laptop battery," he says.

Amorphous silicon thin-film solar cells can be cheaper than conventional crystalline cells because they use a fraction of the material: the cells are 1 micrometer thick, as opposed to the 150-to-200-micrometer-thick silicon layers in crystalline solar cells. But they're also notoriously inefficient. To boost their efficiency, Xunlight made triple-junction cells, which use three different materials--amorphous silicon, amorphous silicon germanium, and nanocrystalline silicon--each of which is tuned to capture the energy in different parts of the solar spectrum. (Conventional solar cells use one primary material, which only captures one part of the spectrum efficiently.)

Still, Xunlight's flexible PV modules are only about 8 percent efficient, while some crystalline silicon modules on the market are more than 20 percent efficient. As a result, Xunlight's large modules produce only 330 watts, whereas an array of crystalline silicon solar panels covering the same area would produce about 740 watts.

Advertisement

United Solar Ovonic, based in Auburn Hills, MI, is already selling flexible PV modules. The company also uses triple-junction amorphous silicon cells, and its modules can be attached to roofing materials. But Xunlight's potential advantage is its high-volume roll-to-roll technique. "If their roll-to-roll process allows them to go to lower cost and larger area, that's the central advantage," says Johanna Schmidtke, an analyst with Lux Research, in Boston. "But they have to prove it with manufacturing."

Print

Related Articles

Nanopillar Solar Cells

A new solar-cell design could cut costs and is suitable for large-scale flexible panels.

More AC Power from Solar Panels

Startup Enphase Energy is shrinking DC-to-AC inverters to extract more juice from solar panels.

Ink-Jet Printing for Cheaper Solar Cells

A new printing method could cut costs and produce more-precise features.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

StupidPeasant

98 Comments

  • 984 Days Ago
  • 06/04/2009

price

How tough is it as far as walking on it or cleaning it, like scraping snow or scrubbing oily soot off?  Where I live, we get dry desert sand storms and a lot of lighting.  How would such a thing covering a roof act with heavy static electricity?  Would my house act like a big capacitor?  It is a hard life as a roof in many cities. 

Reply

ECD Fan

4 Comments

  • 981 Days Ago
  • 06/07/2009

Re: price

Reply

StupidPeasant

98 Comments

  • 980 Days Ago
  • 06/08/2009

Re: price

Thank you.   excellent.

Reply

designbus

2 Comments

  • 984 Days Ago
  • 06/04/2009

roll to roll as differentiator?

United Solar and Stan O were proud to be roll to roll many years ago, no? Not sure why the author implies that this is the advantage for Xunlight over United Solar Ovonic?

I remember an old video on PBS highlighting Ovshinsky and Energy Conversion Devices not only for the NIMH and Hydrogen, but for the roll to roll thin film solar incorporated into roofing materials.  On top of that, I am quite sure that Uni-Solar's efficiency is higher than the 8% mentioned for Xunlight.

This seems like a copy cat company to me, not innovation unfortunately.

http://www.uni-solar.com/uploadedFiles/Uni-SolarTechnologyandManufacturingProcessAppendix.pdf

Reply

briang1621

173 Comments

  • 982 Days Ago
  • 06/06/2009

Re: roll to roll as differentiator?

I agree with Designbus, this seems like another company trying to develop a roll out solar cell. Unfortunately, it has not caught on yet. WHY?
I surmise that the Price per square foot is too high. And price per generated KW hour is too high.
  A smart business owner, or home owner, would go for this, but the time to recoup the investment of Solar Celling your Roof, should be less than 2 year, especially, in this bad economy.
  So imaging a electrical saving of $300 to $400 per year for a normal house, returned over two year, would at max limit the initial investment amount $1 to $2k. If they could manage to reduce the price to this level, I would image solar cells being ubiquitous. Currently I think solar celling a house cost around $10K to $15K which is way to high! 
  Hence, I am most interested in manufacturing cost reductions, unfortunately this article does not mention anything about cost : (
Next time tell us how much per square foot!
Dr. Brian Glassman
Ph.D in Innovation Management from Purdue University.
Brian.Glassman@Gmail.com

Reply

ECD Fan

4 Comments

  • 981 Days Ago
  • 06/07/2009

Re: roll to roll as differentiator?

Reply

briang1621

173 Comments

  • 732 Days Ago
  • 02/11/2010

Re: roll to roll as differentiator?

Great points !
  Thanks
Brian

Reply

Advertisement

ECD Fan

4 Comments

  • 981 Days Ago
  • 06/07/2009

Re: roll to roll as differentiator?

Reply

designbus

2 Comments

  • 979 Days Ago
  • 06/09/2009

Re: roll to roll as differentiator?

Nice. I did not know that regarding Mr. Deng. Also, I must admit that the words "quite sure" were probably an overstatement when speaking of the efficiencies. I had utilized a chart found via google (see link below), that I'd seen for the first time as I was writing the comment. Obviously not the best source.

http://www.wikinvest.com/stock/Energy_Conversion_Devices_(ENER)

I suppose my motivation for commenting in the first place was less to argue that ECD is somehow superior to Xunlight (or First Solar for that matter) and more that they had been doing roll to roll for years while the author seemed to be implying that Xunlight was blazing the trail.

Reply

robmitch

1 Comment

  • 452 Days Ago
  • 11/18/2010

Re: roll to roll as differentiator?

Wow, this (the panel level data on the link in the comment I am trying to reply to) looks like a seriously useful collection of data ... the world turns quite quickly though ... don't suppose whoever put it together actually has cost per panel info as well?

Reply

jackww

1 Comment

  • 468 Days Ago
  • 11/02/2010

Solar Panels

Some years ago I read about a tech. guru who had invented a system of making solar panels similar to making paper. He had a manufacturing unit in Silicon Valley and was starting another in Germany. I'd like to know how his system progressed so I wonder can anyone give a contact reference for his company ?
Thanks
Jack Williams
Ireland

Reply

writepro

1 Comment

  • 449 Days Ago
  • 11/21/2010

Re: Solar Panels

Woke with the idea of rollable solar panels for a survival idea and found this discussion with the information that these two companies obviously have been trying develope and get this technology going for some time.

What I am/was thinking; what if solar panels could be made on one side of a rollable polymer skin and be like a sunshade that could be pulled from your roof like today's sunshades/sunscreens?

It could be used for added electricity in your home which could be stored, and on a sunny day, you could pull it out to completely run your house electrics.

Also, thinking about that application, why wouldn't it be feasible to create roll type solar panels that could roll down from the top of your roof in good weather and hide-a-way in bad (although snowed in days would be good too if you wanted to scrape the snow off your roof to pull out the panels -snowy days cause super sun reflectivity).

Just my thought and idea.

Thanks for showing me that the idea of rollable solar panels was already someone's idea too.

...now if we could just get them as small as my idea...

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Consumer-Driven Disruptions

More

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Crowdcast

ARM Holdings

American Superconductor

IBM

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement