Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Cellulosic Ethanol on the Cheap

Mascoma has announced several advances that may lead to a cheaper, more efficient process to turn biomass into ethanol.

By Jennifer Chu

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

The process of making ethanol from cellulosic sources such as wood chips and paper pulp is somewhat like following a complicated French recipe: it takes many costly ingredients and multiple pots, each with its own settings and instructions, to concoct the final product, and the entire enterprise is expensive and somewhat inefficient. Now Mascoma, a cellulosic biofuels company based in Lebanon, NH, reports significant advances in its goal of simplifying the cellulosic ethanol process by skipping the use of costly enzymes, which could potentially reduce cellulosic ethanol's production costs by 20 to 30 percent.

Microbe breweries: A new technique employs engineered superbugs to turn cellulose directly into ethanol from sources such as (pictured from left to right) corn stover, wood chips and paper sludge.
Credit: Mascoma

Mascoma's strategy, called consolidated bioprocessing, aims to combine the multiple steps of ethanol production into one, using genetically engineered superbugs that perform the multiple steps involved in making cellulosic ethanol. The company reports a series of advances that it says brings it "substantially closer to commercialization." Mascoma announced the results recently at the 31st Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals, in San Francisco.

Existing technology to produce ethanol from cellulosic sources involves a multistep process: plant material such as paper pulp and switchgrass are first pretreated, to separate cellulose from the rest of the plant matter. Cellulose is then mixed with enzymes that break it down into sugars. Yeast then takes over to ferment the sugars into ethanol.

As a less costly alternative, Mascoma researchers are engineering microbes to combine the last two steps of the process: breaking down cellulose, and converting sugars into ethanol. They say that if they can get microorganisms to make ethanol at sufficiently high rates, they can reduce the amount of expensive enzymes needed to break down cellulose, which can normally take up half of ethanol's production costs.

Story continues below


The company is exploring three potential organisms for ethanol production: two types of bacteria, and one yeast strain. C. thermocellum and T. saccharolyticum are thermophilic bacteria, able to withstand high temperatures such as those experienced in reactors. Researchers have been interested in both bacterial strains for years due to their natural ability to both convert cellulose into sugar and ferment sugar into ethanol.

However, these strains produce very low levels of ethanol. The limiting factor is its by-products: both bacteria break down cellulose into glucose and other sugars such as xylose. The bacteria can then ferment glucose into ethanol, but remaining sugars like xylose cannot be fermented. What's more, ethanol yield is low because bacteria produce other organic acid by-products in the fermentation process, such as acetate and lactate. Scientists have also found that these bacteria are inhibited and stop growing in the presence of high levels of ethanol.

Comments

  • Super Bugs Can Get Loose
    So, what happens when these GE yeast strains get loose and start turning forests into sugar? What happens to livestock when such bugs get into their feed? What happens to us?

    Does anyone know who is minding the store on such matters? We've all seen what happened to the financial world when they were left to their big ideas. I'm afraid for what might happen to our food supply when some technician says, "Oops, that wasn't supposed to happen like that."

    Also, the whole discussion about ethanol presupposes a future that continues to rely on combustion engines. Since all the available biomass would never amount to more than 10% of our future total automotive fuels, then we have to assume that we'd continue to rely on gasoline for the rest.

    Here's the problem with that. Even if we doubled fuel efficiency and were able to blend 20% ethanol on average by 2030, we'd use the same amount of gasoline as we do today. We'd import more oil than we do today today despite a dwindling availability.

    No, we don't need to waste time with super bugs and take those risks. We need to imagine that by 2030 everyone drives an electric car. Homegrown electricity from a variety of renewable sources is what we need to keep stable and reliable energy supply into the future. We're getting palpably close to genuinely appealing EV technology. Even compressed air technology might mature very soon as a lower tech approach to the whole problem. In that case electricity provides the energy to compress air.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    MakeSense
    05/17/2009
    Posts:99
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Super Bugs Can Get Loose
      I work in a hospital lab, and this was my first thought too.  Superbugs can be devestating, and until these yeasts are tested thoroughly, I would not my loved ones handling them. I understand the need to create more ethanol cheaper, but I am not sure this is the way to go without further testing including anitbiotic susceptibilities.  After all, these are going to be used in a setting that will allow contact with humans and animals.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      microlong
      05/18/2009
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
  • Scary Organisms
    I am an RN, and it is truly scary to think that we have no agency capable of overseeing all this research. We desperately need to make sure that we do not produce such organisms. The HCL process seems to be much more promising and far safer. We should use cellulose, while improving the soils at the same time. We have far more cellulose than anyone can imagine, and can produce more. The western states could reduce their wildfire expense by harvesting overgrowth, roadsides, medians, wastelands, swamps,wooodlot thinning,  can all be cultivated while taking wildlife into consideration. The cellulose can be used for ethanol or combustion , in gasifiers, to cleanly produce electricity.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ronwagn
    07/09/2009
    Posts:23
    Avg Rating:
    3/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.