Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Betting on Green

Falling oil prices mean tough times for renewable energy, but experts expect the industry to bounce back.

By Michael Fitzgerald

Thursday, October 30, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Falling oil prices helped kill the alternative-energy business in the late 1970s. So plummeting prices combined with nearly frozen credit markets and a grim economic outlook paint a bleak picture for today's alternative-energy market. Still, concerns over global warming and energy security could mean that alternative energy remains a good prospect for future investment.

Credit: Technology Review

Over the past few months, the credit crisis has been accompanied by a precipitous drop in the price of oil, which peaked at almost $150 a barrel in mid-July.

Data from New Energy Finance, a market research firm based in London, shows that alternative-energy companies received $13 billion in venture and private equity investments from the start of the year to the third quarter of 2008--more than the $9.8 billion invested throughout 2007. But these numbers have started to dip: between the second and third quarters, spending on large-scale projects fell from $23.8 billion in the second quarter to $17.7 billion in the third quarter, and smaller amounts are expected for this quarter and the next.

This underscores the relative risks for different alternative-energy companies, according to Travis Bradford, founder and president of the Prometheus Institute for Sustainable Development, based in Cambridge, MA. Bradford says that biofuel firms in particular face a more complex set of problems than other alternative-energy companies do. The risk for these companies is worse, he says, because "you don't know what your feedstock costs are going to be for the next 20 years, and you don't know what the price of oil and gas will be."

A spokesman for AE Biofuels, based in Cupertino, CA, which operates both traditional ethanol and cellulosic ethanol production facilities, admits that "this terrible financial market . . . is going to definitely affect our ability to finance any activities."

Story continues below


And Ethan Zindler, head of North American research for New Energy Finance, notes that cellulosic ethanol companies were already facing problems because their technology remains unproven and because the oil market that they hope to disrupt is so volatile. "This is not a new problem," he says. "It's been an issue for cellulosic ethanol makers, and probably will continue to be an issue [after the current crisis is over]."

Still, observers say that two things make the current situation different from the 1970s. First, geopolitics has made clean energy and energy security a national priority in many countries, including the United States. Second, alternative-energy technologies are now much better.

Comments

  • More Biofuel Problems
    There are more reasons alt energy is suffering than stated in the article.  Food-to-fuel is a disasterous concept and even without our fiscal crisis shouldn't be pursued.  Ethanol is a terrible choice of alternative fuels because it is corrosive, absorbs water, destroys fuel system component, and has less energy than gasoline.  Developing propanol or butanol would have been a better choice.  And I hope algal or other 3rd and 4th gen fuels prove cost effective.  Our fiscal crisis was brought on in part because of our failed energy policy, which included subsidizing the ag industry to grow fuel crops.  For 3 decades Congress has prevented the US from developing its own resources.  This has devalued our dollar, sent trillions of dollars overseas which otherwise might have been used for alt fuel investment, lost the US tens of thousands of good paying jobs, and funded our enemies.  Remember that ANWR alone represents $1 trillion of recoverable assets.  Shale oil is higher with up to $80 trillion.  Environmentalists have pursued a failed strategy of demonizing oil, instead of working towards a slow transition with the best alternatives.  Many of the biofuels are far from green.  Fertilizers to grow ethanol feedstock release N2O, which is 296X worse than CO2 as a GWG.  These same fertilizers are killing offshore waters with runoff. Ethanol creates ozone, which in Seattle is causing ozone attainment not to be met.  And yet our legislature continues to up the mandate.  Ethanol is blamed now for 40% of small engine repairs according to MSNBC poll, which means more equipment replacement added cost.  Government has overreacted and doesn't consider best science and best economics.  But what can you expect with the high proportion of lawyers who value their reelection more than common sense.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    RD
    10/30/2008
    Posts:125
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: More Biofuel Problems
      There are several countries profitably using biofuels... cars can be designed to run effectively and efficiently on ethanol... although corn is impractical as a source of ethanol, there are other sources (celluloid) that shows plenty of promise and require no fertilizers and, in fact, have a zero-net carbon imprint due to their utilizing CO2 in growth cycle. It takes a gallon of petro to make 1.3 gallons of corn ethanol... it takes 1 gal to make approx 10 gal of switch grass ethanol... the special interests groups have caused this and, hopefully, the next president will do what's right for the people.

      Although any carbon based fuel will not fully solve the problem, this sounds like a good "bridge" until new technology becomes feasible.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      iWonder
      10/31/2008
      Posts:1
    • Re: More Biofuel Problems
      Yes, food to fuel has had it's problems. We should invest money into food science to help solve this problem; this would also create food science jobs which would help the faltering economy to recover.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Britt Borden
      05/19/2009
      Posts:18
      Avg Rating:
      1/5
  • Betting on a Global Green
    As oil prices are down and incentives for green projects decrease, it is a great opportunity to internalize environmental costs to economies at the global level. The idea is to transform the global economy from the OLD fossil fuel based economy to the NEW digital economy.

    Such transformation (a paradigm shift) does not depend only on largely developed resources of the supply side, but to a great extend on small ones that require the development of the highly undeveloped resources of the demand side. To understand such an approach, readers are advised to take a look at the EWPC article U.S. Presidential Elections and the Need for a Global Energy Deal
    Rate this comment: 12345

    javs
    10/30/2008
    Posts:95
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • oil price fall temporary
    soon as the recession ends and demand picks up, watch for the price of oil to return close to its pre-recession level. It may be a bit lower b/c of the speculator element being gone but certainly above $100
    Rate this comment: 12345

    snedunuri
    11/01/2008
    Posts:43
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • preparing for more expensive gasoline
    We should be preparing for more expensive gasoline just like 1992 ford mustang parts. People are smart enough to know that it will happen again and that what the government can do for us is not control the price of oil but lessen our dependence on oil.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    MickeyFouse
    01/20/2009
    Posts:47
    Avg Rating:
    1/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.