Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement
[1] 2 Next »

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

Efficient, Cheap Solar Cells

New materials for high-performance cells could make solar power affordable.

By Kevin Bullis

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
Further reflection: This new solar cell is extremely efficient but can be made cheaply, thanks to a new technique for affixing mirrors to silicon.
Credit: Suniva

A cheap new way to attach mirrors to silicon yields very efficient solar cells that don't cost much to manufacture. The technique could lead to solar panels that produce electricity for the average price of electricity in the United States.

Suniva, a startup based in Atlanta, has made solar cells that convert about 20 percent of the energy in the sunlight that falls on them into electricity. That's up from 17 percent for its previous solar cells and close to the efficiency of the best solar cells on the market. But unlike other high-efficiency silicon solar cells, says Ajeet Rohatgi, the company's founder and chief technology officer, Suniva's are made using low-cost methods. One such method is screen printing, a relatively cheap process much like the silk-screen process used to print T-shirts.

So far, the high cost of solar cells has limited them to a marginal role in power production, accounting for less than 1 percent of electricity worldwide. Rohatgi calculates that the company's low-cost manufacturing techniques will make solar power competitive with conventional sources, producing electricity for about 8 to 10 cents per kilowatt-hour--the average cost of electricity in the United States and far less than prices in many markets.

Suniva's cells are efficient largely because they can trap light, keeping photons inside the active material of the solar cell until their energy can be used to free electrons and generate an electrical current. The basic concept of trapping light is not new. It relies on texturing the front surface of the layer of silicon that forms the active material of the solar cell. The texturing creates facets that redirect incoming light, refracting it so that, instead of passing directly through the silicon, it travels along the length of the silicon layer. The photons thus stay in the material longer and have a better chance of being absorbed by atoms in the material. When that happens, the energy in the photons can free electrons that are used to generate current.

Light trapping can be enhanced by pairing the textured surface with a reflective layer at the back of the silicon layer. The mirror keeps the light in the solar cell still longer, further increasing the number of freed electrons. As a consequence, the silicon can be half its ordinary thickness while absorbing the same amount of light. Using less of an expensive material reduces costs directly. But it also allows solar-cell makers to make do with cheaper, less pure forms of silicon. In a conventional solar cell, which can have a silicon layer 200 micrometers thick, impurities within the material can easily trap electrons before they reach the surface and escape to generate a current. In a layer of silicon just 100 micrometers thick, however, the electrons have a shorter distance to travel, so they're less likely to encounter an impurity before they escape. Lower-grade silicon is much cheaper and easier to make than the highly refined silicon ordinarily used in solar cells.

[1] 2 Next »

Resources

Events

Comments

  • Other risks
    protn7 on 09/23/2008 at 1:26 AM
    Posts:
    37
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    The capitalists took a risk on their product; silk screened solar cells. Vulvox offers similar risks and similar promises. If you asked an investor its' well worth taking. That technology was shown to work in the lab many times. A knowledgeable investor would understand the risk was worth taking since there were already signs it would work. http://vulvox.tripod.com
    • Re: Other risks
      lasertekk on 09/23/2008 at 10:32 AM
      Posts:
      25
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      This are not the time to be using words like 'capitalist, risk or investor' on a science and technology site, with the second storming of the Bastille being contemplated by middle America.  There's a reason some of us took the science major route and stayed away from the filth and greed that was business.
      • Re: Other risks
        Monsterboy on 09/24/2008 at 11:00 AM
        Posts:
        62
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
        Like it or not, the science will go nowhere without investors to pay for it. Technology is the offspring of science and money.

This discussion has been moved to our discussions forum.

Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review November/December 2008
Sun + Water = Fuel
An MIT chemist has opened the way to making hydrogen fuel from water using sunlight.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology