Clean coal: The Vattenfall pilot plant in eastern Germany is the first coal-fired power plant to capture and store its carbon-dioxide emissions. The pilot plant, which has a thermal capacity of 30 megawatts, cost roughly 70 million euros. A larger demonstration-scale plant is scheduled for operation by 2015.
Vattenfall

Business

Clean-Coal Debut in Germany

A new coal plant is the first to capture and store carbon dioxide.

  • Friday, September 19, 2008
  • By Rob Edwards

It used to be called stinky town, because the pollution from burning dirty coal was so appalling. But now, if a new pilot plant works, Spremberg, in eastern Germany, could become the birthplace of a clean-coal revolution.

Earlier this month, the world's first coal-fired power plant designed to capture and store carbon dioxide that it produces began operations in Spremberg. The pilot plant has been built at a power station that, under Communist rule last century, used to belch out clouds of sulfurous smoke from burning brown coal, or lignite. "Industrial history is being written," says Tuomo Hatakka, chair of the European board of Vattenfall, the Swedish power company behind the new plant. Indeed, the development of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology is seen by many experts as essential to help the world cut carbon-dioxide emissions in coal-fired power stations.

Vattenfall's small 30-megawatt plant burns the lignite in air from which nitrogen has been removed. Combustion in the resulting oxygen-rich atmosphere produces a waste stream of carbon dioxide and water vapor, three-quarters of which is recycled back into the boiler.

By repeating this process, known as oxyfuel, it is possible to greatly concentrate the carbon dioxide. After particles and sulfur have been removed, and water vapor has been condensed out, the waste gas can be 98 percent carbon dioxide, according to Vattenfall.

Advertisement

The separated carbon dioxide will be cooled down to -28 °C and liquefied. Starting next year, the plan is to transport it by truck 150 miles northwest, to be injected 3,000 meters underground into a depleted inland gas field in Altmark. Ideally, in the future, the gas will be carried by pipeline to underground storage, says Vattenfall.

Compressing and transporting the carbon dioxide takes energy, as does the initial extraction of nitrogen. So these processes reduce the overall efficiency of the plant, although Vattenfall is attempting to counter this by investigating ways of boosting the efficiency of the boiler--by predrying the coal, for example.

The aim, according to the company's vice president, Lars Strömberg, is to develop a power plant with "almost zero" pollution. He says that achieving no emissions will be impossible, "but we will come very, very close to this target."

In an initial three-year testing program, the Schwarze Pumpe pilot plant is expected to assess how components function together and exactly what proportion of carbon dioxide can actually be separated. Using the information gained, Vattenfall plans to scale up to a 300-to-500-megawatt demonstration plant by 2015 and to 1,000-megawatt commercial plants after 2020.

Print

Related Articles

Scrubbing CO2 Cheaply

A new carbon-capture method will be tested at a German coal plant.

The Future of Clean Coal

The DOE's decision to abandon FutureGen could accelerate clean-coal technology.

Picking a Winner in Clean-Coal Technology

A new MIT study says that no single technology is the solution to economically cutting carbon-dioxide emissions from coal.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

bpg131313

6 Comments

  • 1243 Days Ago
  • 09/19/2008

Interested

While I am not convinced that this solution is one that will be safe in the long-term due to the unknowns surrounding subsurface injection of liquid CO2, I am nonetheless interested because the technology could turn out to be beneficial. 

I look forward to this plant working over the years with all of the agencies and groups overseeing its progress.  If it fails, at least it'll be a relatively isolated failure in that there aren't many of these operations moving forward.

I'll remain cautiously optimistic about this form of energy production until the world is able to see and verify data independently.

Reply

  • 1243 Days Ago
  • 09/19/2008

CO2 used for algae/biofuel feedstock?

Wouldn't a more practical application of the waste CO2 be for use as feedstock to algae used in biofuel generation?  BOTH electricity generation w/ CO2 capture, AND biofuel production would benefit from this 'clean' process.  I haven't even attempted the math of CO2 available from clean-coal vs algae for bio-fuel demand...so I may be a little off-base.  Either way, I'm just hoping to stir up discussion w/ expert opinion's on this matter.

Reply

TooMany

125 Comments

  • 1241 Days Ago
  • 09/21/2008

Re: CO2 used for algae/biofuel feedstock?

Recycling the carbon this way in effect uses solar engery.  The amount of energy should be comparible to the energy released by burning the coal.  I doubt that algae is extremely effecient at this so why not just use the solar power directly?

Reply

JayDawg

1 Comment

  • 1156 Days Ago
  • 12/15/2008

Re: CO2 used for algae/biofuel feedstock?

You state that you doubt that algae is extremely efficient at energy conversion.  What information are your doubts based on?   As far as not just using the solar power directly,  the ability to store the solar energy is the same battery technology issue we have with plug in hybrids.  The beautiful thing about fuel creation is its ability to be transported and stored for later use.

Reply

zig158

64 Comments

  • 1242 Days Ago
  • 09/20/2008

Algae oil

Jhalter bet me to the punch, just think how fast algae would grow in 98% CO2. A full-scale clean coal plant could feed a very large bioreactor. I wonder if that has been their long-term plan from the start. Once all the technical problems are sorted out, you could make a killing selling all the oil.

Reply

phoenix

172 Comments

  • 1242 Days Ago
  • 09/20/2008

old king coal

Although I am a little late posting to Fridays articles, (I have been a just a little busy in summation), I wonder why so many people are against giving coal, which has such abundant natural reserves and the potential to provide much needed electrical energy, a second look. If, as our other posters say, there is even more potential in CO2 capture to initiate such beneficial chemical reactions, the public should be made aware of the possiblities. The ensuing debate would certainly be interesting.

Reply

nuubik

2 Comments

  • 1240 Days Ago
  • 09/22/2008

energy losses

There are visible losses in the system where
excess heat is removed to cool the steam down.
The heat, that is left over from steam turbines, should be used with maybe Stirling heat engines. This way the low-grade heat is also converted to mechanical energy  - just a thought ...

Reply

Advertisement

nekote

139 Comments

  • 1240 Days Ago
  • 09/22/2008

¢/KWH - solar going to be cheaper?

¢/KWH

Germany and Great Britain are among the most un-economic places, on the earth, for solar.

http://www.oksolar.com/abctech/images/world_solar_radiation_large.gif

Even so, is solar going to turn out to be cheaper?

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Consumer-Driven Disruptions

More

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Applied Materials

Joule Unlimited

Amyris

Lyric Semiconductor

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement