Technology Review

Business

Awaiting the Google Phone

Whether Google has succeeded in revolutionizing the cell phone may depend on who you ask.

  • Friday, September 19, 2008
  • By Kate Greene

In New York next week, Google and T-Mobile will unveil the long-awaited Google Phone. The device, made by the Taiwanese cell-phone company HTC, is expected to have a large touch screen, a QWERTY keypad, and a 3.1-megapixel camera, among other features. More significant than the gadget itself, however, is the software that it contains: a cell-phone operating system developed by Google called Android.

Google released a software development kit for Android in November 2007, at the same time founding the Open Handset Alliance--a consortium of hardware, software, and telecommunications companies charged with producing open standards for mobile gadgets. In developing Android, Google's goal has been simple: to revolutionize the mobile phone as we know it.

For programmers, Android is a big deal. Other cell-phone operating systems, such as Windows Mobile and Symbian, are notoriously tricky to write programs for and sometimes limit access to the underlying hardware, such as the camera or GPS chip. In contrast, Android has been designed to make it simple to build applications, and it gives programmers free rein over a phone's hardware.

Just ask Jasper Lin, who codeveloped an application that recently won $275,000 in a Google-backed Android competition. Lin's team, called Locale, wrote software that automatically changes a phone's settings, such as its ring volume, depending on the time of day, the user's location, and the events in her calendar. "Android is a really great platform from a developer's perspective," says Lin. "I've developed for Symbian, and that was quite arduous at times."

Advertisement

Although Android is not completely open source (the entire source code is expected to be released later this year), Lin says that it already gives developers much greater access to hardware than other devices do.

But for the average cell-phone user, the significance of Google's first phone may depend more on whether HTC's device is slicker and more desirable than other smart phones out there. Jack Gold, founding analyst of Jack Gold Associates, believes that the first Android phones will inevitably be compared to the iPhone and that they may fail to measure up. "All indications right now are that [the HTC device] is not another iPhone and that it's not going to take the market by storm," he says.

And first impressions will be vital, he believes. "If the first set of devices are not hits, will there be a second set? Mobile vendors and manufactures are not all that healthy. Most aren't making a whole lot of money."

Over the long term, however, the success of Android will also depend on the quality of its applications. And with a project as widely distributed as Android, the question of quality control--making sure that third-party applications work well and aren't malicious--arises. The iPhone App Store solves this problem by vetting each application as it comes in. Android's model, however, is more of a free-for-all, says Lin.

People who download Android applications will be able to try them out on their phone and then vote--on whether or not they work well or drain the phone's battery, for instance. "You give [users] the power, and the apps that don't work will be voted down," Lin says. This is an incentive for him to write Locale in a way that makes it extremely power efficient.

But whether this approach also translates into better applications remains to be seen, and this could be all-important. "It's not about what's powering the device," says Gold. "It's about what the device can empower a consumer to do."

Print

Related Articles

Making Android More Secure

The open platform calls for a different approach to security.

New iPhone OS Adds Missing Features

The update aims to address most user complaints.

Android Has Arrived

Google's phone has plenty of potential, but some say its mechanism for delivering applications could lead to problems.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

drthompson

4 Comments

  • 1236 Days Ago
  • 09/19/2008

Open Platforms are Good

Imagine for a moment if you bought say a Dell computer and they told you that;
- All software needed to be vetted by Dell, any software that competes with a Dell supplied version will not be tolerated

- We can go into your device and delete any software we find offensive or competes with us

- You can only connect to the internet via Dellnet

- The only email program you use is furnished by Dell

- No music software other than Dells will be tolerated

Would you buy one?  Probably not yet this is the model the current carriers and phone providers use and we just accept it.  Substitute Apple for Dell and you get my point.

Now I use an HTC startrek, otherwise known here in the US as a Cingular 3125 - there is a huge community that has hacked this phone and made it much more usable than the original version. AND this is with out the support of Microsoft or HTC, if Google and T mobile really, really make this an open source platform then it will fundamentally change the game, if they don't get greedy.

We'll see, HTC is a great innovator but I don't have high hopes for the first generation but following Google's mantra of release early and iterate, the following should be great.

Reply

generalsnozzie

2 Comments

  • 1236 Days Ago
  • 09/19/2008

Google Phone?

I was under the impression for reading other articles that Google had no part in making a phone, rather the HTC Dream was just going to be the first phone to showcase Android. It would be like calling every WM device a Microsoft Phone.

Also, did Google really release Android already? I had gathered that it was only the developer kit which was released and that actual OS wouldn't be available until sometime after the launch of the Dream. And I don't know if its quite right to refer to a different magazine, but PopSci has an interesting Gallery mentioning some of the applications that are in development for Android and some sound amazing.

Reply

willknight

37 Comments

  • 1236 Days Ago
  • 09/19/2008

Re: Google Phone?

Thanks for the catch generalsnozzie. It was the SDK, not the Operating System, that was released last November. That has been fixed.

Reply

LDighera

13 Comments

  • 1234 Days Ago
  • 09/21/2008

Mobilephone Platform Of Choice

If the HTC Touch Diamond™ is Google's platform of choice, it may be competitive with the iPhone.

Reply

ArtInvent

67 Comments

  • 1233 Days Ago
  • 09/22/2008

Access to the cloud

I believe what you do on your computer is pretty much what you are going to do on your phone: web browsing, email, searches. And probably you'll be doing more maps because you're out and about. Between Chrome and Gmail and of course Google search and Google maps - why on earth would I not want to get a Google phone?

So how about music, photos, videos? Consider that you could access your Napster or Rhapsody subscription service online. You've got all the music you can imagine - no need to even load it into memory. Photos? Just go to your online photo share site, (Picasa, anyone?) so there's also no need to sync photos to your phone. Ditto for videos you've posted or want to check out on YouTube.

Google's ability to integrate it's own web apps with this ought to be compelling enough. But, don't like the Google apps I just mentioned? Well, it's all open and browser based so use any other service or site you want.

Frankly, it hardly matters if the phone itself or the software is as clever as an iPhone or not. The access and openness is what makes the whole thing so compelling.


Reply

andy.m

1 Comment

  • 1231 Days Ago
  • 09/24/2008

Success/Proliferation of Google Phone

I think that a large part of the success is not just in the apps that are provided but in people's interest in controlling their own toys. It's getting easier to program all the time and more people (younger generations) are more involved in development everyday; on some scale. If you get a solid baseline for the phone and it's easy to develop and deploy apps; I think it will take off like wild fire with the college crowd. From there it will naturally spread. As was stated before in the article, windows and iphone development are difficult entry points; cumbersome APIs and costly platforms. For me that's enough to make those two options not worth pursuing. But that's why other people are making money on those apps. ;)

Reply

DN10

1 Comment

  • 1217 Days Ago
  • 10/08/2008

Android Software

The power of the G1 is in the operating sysytem.  If you look at some of the applications created in the Android Developers Challenge, they are amazing.  Within a year people will realise the true power of this phone.  I am documenting all the available software on my site.
Gareth
http://www.googlephone.me

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Consumer-Driven Disruptions

More

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

1366 Technologies

Novartis

Netflix

eSolar

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement