Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement
[1] 2 Next »

Friday, February 22, 2008

Fuel from Algae

A startup's new process could make fuel from algae as cheap as petroleum.

By Kevin Bullis

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
Green fuel: A startup has developed a method for converting the algae shown here into fuel.
Credit: Solazyme

Solazyme, a startup based in South San Francisco, CA, has developed a new way to convert biomass into fuel using algae, and the method could lead to less expensive biofuels. The company recently demonstrated its algae-based fuel in a diesel car, and in January, it announced a development and testing agreement with Chevron. Late last year, the company received a $2 million grant from the National Institute of Standards and Technology to develop a substitute for crude oil based on algae.

The new process combines genetically modified strains of algae with an uncommon approach to growing algae to reduce the cost of making fuel. Rather than growing algae in ponds or enclosed in plastic tubes that are exposed to the sun, as other companies are trying to do, Solazyme grows the organisms in the dark, inside huge stainless-steel containers. The company's researchers feed algae sugar, which the organisms then convert into various types of oil. The oil can be extracted and further processed to make a range of fuels, including diesel and jet fuel, as well as other products.

The company uses different strains of algae to produce different types of oil. Some algae produce triglycerides such as those produced by soybeans and other oil-rich crops. Others produce a mix of hydrocarbons similar to light crude petroleum.

Solazyme's method has advantages over other approaches that use microorganisms to convert sugars into fuel. The most common approaches use microorganisms such as yeast to ferment sugars, forming ethanol. The oils made by Solazyme's algae can then be used for a wider range of products than ethanol, says Harrison Dillon, the company's president and chief technology officer.

What's more, the algae has a particular advantage over many other microorganisms when it comes to processing sugars from cellulosic sources, such as grass and wood chips. Such cellulosic sources require less energy, land, and water to grow than corn grain, the primary source of biofuel in the United States. But when biomass is broken down into sugars, it still contains substances such as lignin that can poison other microorganisms. In most other processes, lignin has to be separated from the sugars to keep the microorganisms healthy. But the tolerance of the algae to lignin makes it possible to skip this step, which can reduce costs.

The process also has significant advantages over a quite different way of using algae to create biofuels--one that makes use of algae's ability to employ sunlight to produce their own supply of sugar, using photosynthesis. In these approaches, the algae are grown in ponds or bioreactors where they are exposed to sunlight and make their own sugar. In Solazyme's approach, the researchers deliberately turn off photosynthetic processes by keeping the algae in the dark. Instead of getting energy from sunlight, the algae get energy from the sugars that the researchers feed them.

[1] 2 Next »

Resources

Events

Tags

biofuel

Comments

  • But the sugar...???
    tsteeg on 02/22/2008 at 4:09 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    I may have missed something here - but the analysis presented seems to miss any discussion of where the sugar to feed the algae comes from; presumably growing this does require significant energy, land, and water (and solar input)?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: But the sugar...???
      bj on 02/22/2008 at 9:54 AM
      Posts:
      27
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      I agree this needs to be looked at. Especially since the price of anything you'd make sugar out of has skyrocketed, and FOOD prices are going through the roof.

      We need to be putting our research dollars into things OTHER THAN BIOFUELS. Like solar, wind, geothermal, tidal, etc. And start building REAL public transportation systems (remember trains?) that run on energy made from these alternatives.
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: But the sugar...???
      juandegringo on 02/22/2008 at 10:35 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      Yes, indeed:  just where does that sugar come from and what is the total cost of production, including the carbon footprint, etc.?

      Moreover, instead of dancing-in-the-dark with algae, why throw the baby out with the bathwater by walking away from the investment required to develop a cost-competitive, algae-based biofuel from photosynthesis if it promises to: 1) convert CO2 emissions into oxygen to help balance the current decline in atmospheric 02 - a "minor" detail that "almost" everyone on the "green bandwagon" has conveniently ignored, and, 2) provides the highest energy content biofuel? 

      I'm all for investing in the other renewable technologies, and am not looking forward to seeing "The Attack of Frankenalgae", but I believe the environmentally-balanced, economic case can and should be made for development of solar-grown algae for the reasons above.

      Why are we humans so inanely stupid?  OK.  OK.  The two threads are not completely related.
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: But the sugar...???
      killian on 02/22/2008 at 10:36 AM
      Posts:
      55
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      You are not missing anything; they assume photosynthesis is done elsewhere, which means it is grossly inefficient.  Algae biodiesel is probably the only biofuel that makes any sense, but this process throws away the one thing that makes algae interesting: their photosynthetic efficiency, which can exceed 1%.  Their process depends on sugars from other plants.  Consider one of the best: sugarcane.  Fundamentals of Renewable Energy Processes by da Rosa gives the photosynthetic efficiency of sugarcane as 0.38%.  (And that is before subtracting the energy inputs to grow the sugarcane.)
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: But the sugar...???
      ryuuguu on 02/23/2008 at 1:54 AM
      Posts:
      9
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      The article was not very clear about it, but it did make a minor mention of lignin and cellulose. So I am guessing they get their sugar from the woody portion of the plants, this could mean corn stalks or trees. It would be good to know if this is the case.
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: But the sugar...???
      prbenoit on 02/25/2008 at 10:04 AM
      Posts:
      3
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      I like most of what I've been hearing. But how about this: Kudzu as BIOMASS
      It is currently at or near the top of invasive species lists for virtually every southern state. Kudzu, as a member of the Fabaceae family, is a natural nitrogen fixer and, thus, grows rapidly across the landscape with no inputs (e.g., fertilizers). Given its perennial growth habit, its rapid growth rate, and the fact that kudzu has a high starch content (particularly its root system), its potential as a biofuel could be tremendous. However, to date, this potential has basically gone unstudied. 
         
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: But the sugar...???
        dian33 on 05/21/2008 at 8:45 PM
        Posts:
        2
        Avg Rating:
        5/5
        Kudzu can also be made into a tea and used as a cure
        for alcoholism. Kudzu may be starchy but can it be processed in a way to produced oil. It could be used 
        for a host of other applications. 
        Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: But the sugar...???
        Batensmack on 05/29/2008 at 6:47 PM
        Posts:
        1
        Do you think it would be possible to convert an old paper mill into a wood-chip algae oil processing plant?  We've got one in Canton, NC that has all of the supply lines for the wood chips, but uses an arsschloss of coal power to operate the plant.  Real dirty.  Poisoned a river.   Seems like a fit to me.

        We've got an superhole of kudzu, too. 
        Rate this comment: 12345
        • Re: But the sugar...???
          jimmiller5417 on 09/23/2008 at 6:48 PM
          Posts:
          6
          Avg Rating:
          5/5
          Dear Batensmack:

          The woodchip mill is perfect for syngas and biochar, the latter being the new "black gold" of permaculture and holistic ag production.  The wood chips are "slow roasted", giving off "producer gas" which can be burned directly or made into gasoline or biodiesel.  The surprise is the biochar-- charcoal.  The biochar is first infused with nutrient such as soaking it in "tea" made from animal manure or municipal waste-water sludge, then tilled into the ground.  The resulting "terra preta" allows the microbes to feed on carbon, die and thereby creating a "carbon negative" system for storing CO2 in the ground.

          The best article I've found is at: http://beyondzeroemissions.org/2008/06/03/adriana-downie-best-energies-bio-char-agri-char-pyrolysis

          Please read the article and my website: http://algaloildiesel.wetpaint.com, then send me your comments in an email to: jimmiller5417@yahoo.com.
          Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: But the sugar...???
      jester on 06/21/2008 at 12:34 PM
      Posts:
      1
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      sugar is made by photosynthesis. chloroplasts split water and carbon dioxide and build the sugar in the structures that make up the cell walls out of the carbon hydrogen and oxygen. Remember the high school bio C6H12O6
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Production of Algae Biodiesel
    solar nano on 02/22/2008 at 4:16 AM
    Posts:
    9
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    Valcent Products (www.valcent.com) has data showing that they can produce 33,000 gallons of algae biodiesel per acre, using photosythesis, carbon and water in a closed loop system. Solazyme claims they can produce 1,000 times more biofuel than other processes. If they can make that claim, then they should know about how much they can produce, minus the sugar input. It would sure help us folk, that are interested in supporting algae biodiesel, to know just what those figures are.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Production of Algae Biodiesel
      Lee Dekker on 02/22/2008 at 2:55 PM
      Posts:
      1
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      Many think the purpose of biofuels is to enable us all to keep driving our SUV energy hogs happily into the sunset without ever having to (God help us) change a thing.

      One reason it's worth pursuing fuel derived from algae and other renewable sources is because there is currently no substitute for liquid fuel used in jet transport. Nearly all the rest of our transportation needs could be covered by electricity. Continuing to use the same reciprocating piston design as steam engines built in the 1700s is getting a bit silly. Expecting reciprocating engines, burning liquid fuels, to continue providing over 99% of our transportation needs into the future is even sillier, biofuels or not.

      Obviously a transition to electric transport is no small undertaking. But those with the biggest and loudest "can't do" attitudes on the subject also happen to be those making money on the current dead end liquid fuels reciprocating engine game.

      The sugar question needs more explanation, but the way it's written in this article reminds one of a perpetual motion scheme.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: Production of Algae Biodiesel
        solar nano on 02/23/2008 at 12:31 AM
        Posts:
        9
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
        Lee,I couldn't agree with you more. Our future is an all electric economy without greenhouse gases and global warming.  100% of algae biofuels, other than fuels for aircraft, can go directly into generating electricity with the carbon exhaust recycled back into making more biofuel. By going to electric mag-lev high speed trains, we can eliminate half of the aircraft needed for transport. Biofuel for aircraft burn cleaner than the present jet fuels. So far from what I have witnessed, Valcent Products has the best proven method of making algae biofuel with their closed loop system that even recycles water to make more algae along with the carbon from electric generation. If the Solazyme process really works, it could produce biofuel in the bilges of ships to power the ships.  Oil tankers could be converted to making Solazyme biofuels and never have to leave the harbor.

        No more wars, no outsourcing our dollars for fossil fuels, more jobs locally, no use of agricultural lands, all food left on the table, all electric transportation and utilities, no pollution.  World wide affluence and people in control of their future.  Simple! What are we waiting for???
        Rate this comment: 12345
        • Re: Production of Algae Biodiesel
          FantasticReality on 02/24/2008 at 6:47 AM
          Posts:
          1
          Hey solar, you paint a real pretty picture at the end of your last comment. Its a comment that i fully agree with, and its funny you mention that -Im involved with a company that is set up to be a national algae biodiesel distributor. The difference versus solazyme is they are willing to share in the experience and the profits in a very big way, so if you say you support algae biodiesel, i would highly suggest you get in touch with me at fantasticreality@aol.com. Lets talk Algae Biodiesel and making money or wide spread affluence as you say...
          Rate this comment: 12345
          • Re: Production of Algae Biodiesel
            DJTal on 02/27/2008 at 3:18 AM
            Posts:
            116
            Avg Rating:
            3/5
            The whole problem with using algae to produce fuel is being able to create enough ponds or artificial containers to grow the algae in . To compete with the level of production from agriculture and forestry , let alone fossil fuel production would mean covering such a large area of the earth's surface with ponds or plastic and glass containers it just doesn't seem possible . We would probably do better to use the nutrients to fertilize the open oceans .

            Fuel from algae is interesting future technology , but it's not something that is available to us right now for fighting global warming .
            Rate this comment: 12345
            • Re: Production of Algae Biodiesel
              dian33 on 05/21/2008 at 9:06 PM
              Posts:
              2
              Avg Rating:
              5/5
              Currently algae accounts for about 70% of all oxygen produced on earth. Producing more algae outside could possibly help generate more oxygen for the environment. While corn yields around 18 gallons of oil per acre while algae yields 10,000. There is plenty of land. Algae can be grown virtually anywhere above ground. Producing algae can't solve the problem today but could in the near future.
              Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: Production of Algae Biodiesel
        jkljkl02 on 06/04/2008 at 10:52 PM
        Posts:
        1
        Avg Rating:
        1/5
        "One reason it's worth pursuing fuel derived from algae and other renewable sources is because there is currently no substitute for liquid fuel used in jet transport."

        = Strictly speaking this is not so. In the 50's GE designed a jet engine for the military that ran on nuclear power. The engine was successful, but the project was canceled because of the concerns about hazards should the plane crash.
        Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Production of Algae Biodiesel
      jimmiller5417 on 09/23/2008 at 6:58 PM
      Posts:
      6
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      PROSPECTS FOR THE BIODIESEL INDUSTRY

      Where we've been.

      The biodiesel industry has reached a crisis point. The demand for biodiesel has promoted the construction of a large number of biodiesel plants. These refineries use the oils from many plants, but especially soy. The cost of seed oil has risen dramatically because of the rise in petrodiesel costs to farm and the demand for ethanol as an additive to gasoline. Ethanol is used in the processing of biodiesel.

      In Europe, many of the biodiesel plants have been moth-balled because of the high cost of oil seed oil. Imperim Renewables, Gray's Harbor WA, is finishing a 100,000 million gallon per year plant, with no assured source of vegetable oil. They are reluctant to import palm oil because of the adverse ecological impact of the palm plantations. Other refineries are facing the same supply issues.

      The favored source of oil, algal oil, has been touted as the liquid fuel source of the future – and indeed it is. Most early investors put their money up to fund the construction of algae farms. Guess what? They proved they could grow algae using a wide variety of technologies.

      Where we're at.
      Slowly, it dawned on these producers and their investors, that while they could successfully grow algae, they had only very inefficient means of extracting the oil from the algae cells. The universities were of no help since most of their funding was to discover ways of growing algae and tweaking the DNA. None have developed any new technologies to extract the oil in a continuous, large volume process.

      There are ways of fracturing the algae cell to get at the lipids floating around in the cytoplasm. Heat, pressure drop, impingement, solvents, crushing, grinding with small ceramic bebees – all have been tried. Yet much of the technology, derived from the lab bench was not scalable to commercial standards, except at great cost and poor results.

      AlgalOilDiesel to the rescue.
      We have found the technological “sweet spot” for harvesting Chlorella vulgaris cells and extracting the algal oil. The process of harvesting the mature “parent” cells and returning the “daughter” cells to the head of the growing system has been solved. The opening of the Chlorella cell is done by negative pressure leaving the cell wall intact, looking like an opened flower. The cytoplasm and the cell walls are separated and then the lipids (oil) removed, returning the balance of the cytoplasm to the algae production system to add to the nutrient. The cell walls can be dehydrated and sold as a health food supplement or fermented into ethanol. The wash water used to clean the raw biodiesel is laced with Potassium and serves as a nutrient.

      The remaining mechanical issues are: how big do we make the system to handle what quantity of algae? If our clients will tell the quantity, we can build the machinery to handle the clients' request. We are not dealing in rocket science. We are not interested in doing study after study like the universities and think tanks. We want to build the machine the client wants and get it into operation fast. We will stand behind our work and tweak the equipment when necessary. We are constantly on the look-out for new ideas. The technology in this field is a moving target, and we move with it.

      In terms of scale, our designs will serve two primary markets: The small farmer cooperative of fifteen to fifty members, using at least 100,000 gallons of biodiesel a year, and the larger farm which is producing algae which converts to 10 million gallons of biodiesel a year. While the equipment we build (the cell harvester and the cell rupture machine) are fully scalable, some of the equipment we buy from others has not been scalable, except by installing a bank of units. These units include filters, separators, polishers, and solvent recovery devices. We are working with many of these vendors and encouraging them to scale up their equipment. We have encountered the age old problem of “why invent, develop and make a much larger machine, since no one has demanded such machine”. Before Xerox was invented, no one demand a Xerox copier.

      We have the science and engineering talent in our firm and the advanced knowledge of where technology should be driven to solve the “Xerox” conundrum. We will not likely be on the front page of the WSJ any time soon. We are not interested in selling out to an oil company, merely to see our patents and technology suppressed. We know that Chlorella divides 2.5 times per hour. The growth/harvest cycle is about ten days as against annually for oil seed crops. We can grow the algae in cover ponds in the middle of winter in Montana on non-crop soils. We can grow it on dry desert lands. We can make our own distilled water. The wash water can be used to grow algae and other crops. The co-product, glycerol, has many profitable uses, despite what you may have read about the glut of raw glycerine on the market. We want to use the “free” energy of geothermal wells, the Sun and wind energy. We want to be as green as we can get with the smallest carbon footprint.

      Contact information:
      AlgalOilDiesel, LLP
      530 NW 13th St., Corvallis, OR 97330
      Landline: 541-757-9797; cell: 541-971-0403; Skype: jimmiller5417 or 541-359- 3676. Attention: James E. Miller
      Website: http://algaloildiesel.wetpaint.com
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Strains of the algae
    len hillegass on 02/22/2008 at 12:19 PM
    Posts:
    1
    Because the algae are grown in the dark, it would appear that these strains do not require chlorophyll and the whole photosynthetic process.  If that is the case, would a strain lacking the gene sequences for chlorophyll and photosynthesis be more efficient in utilizing sugars in the biochemical production of the “oils”?  Could a chlorophyll/photosynthesis deficient (knockout) strain of the algae be produced to determine if higher yields of oils can be obtained?
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • One part of the jigsaw
    Elroch on 02/23/2008 at 7:45 AM
    Posts:
    28
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    Almost all renewable energy approaches involve a sequence of steps from capturing solar energy to providing useful energy to an end user, and it is the overall efficiency of the whole chain of processes that is the most important thing.

    The technology described here is not a whole chain, it is merely a biochemical processing step to convert sugar to useful oils.

    To evaluate the value of this technology it needs to be examined in the context of an energy chain that includes growing the crop that is used to provide the substrate (sugars, cellulose) for the algae, and see what the overall energy efficiency is. Unfortunately this immediately means that the efficiency is going to be much less than 0.5%, as no crops (other than photosynthetic algae) capture more than 0.5%. Worse, this is reduced by a sizeable fraction due to the inescapable energy costs of fertilizer and transport.

    The bottom line is that this looks like a useful chemical engineering technology, but there is a long way to go before replacing most fossil fuels with biofuels is feasible. In the end we need a much larger overall efficiency than a fraction of one percent to provide the energy that is needed.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: One part of the jigsaw
      jimmiller5417 on 09/23/2008 at 7:07 PM
      Posts:
      6
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      Kevin:

      I am one pilot plant away from being able to prove that algae is the best source of oil for production of bioenergy, especially biodiesel.  For a mere $100,000 I can construct a pilot plant to extract algal oil from Chlorlla vulgaris using relatively low energy technology.

      From the pilot plant level, we can scale the operation to about one million gallons per year per acre of covered ponds at a capital cost of about one million dollars per acre and about $2,500 per acre per year for O & M, not including nutrients.  The amount and kind of nutrients affect the yield, so at this point it is too variable to guess the cost.  My favorite source of nutrients thus far is fish guts.

      See: http://algaoloildiesel.wetpaint.com

      Jim Miller
      jimmiller5417@yahoo.com
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • $/BTU; $/KWH; efficiency
    nekote on 02/24/2008 at 3:08 AM
    Posts:
    120
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    Short of achieving safe, cost effective fusion power, the only real long term solution would seem to be solar, assuming the solution needs to be CO2 neutral.

    Either biologically based, materials based (silicon, GaAs, ...) or some mix of both.

    The winner(s) have to reliably and continuously provide vast industrial quantities of energy that can reach, in a practically and cost effective way, the world's major population centers.  And those winner(s) will provide that energy at the lowest tier of pricing, per unit energy, for their era of dominance.

    The vast deserts of the planet would presumeably be the natural location for the initial collection of solar energy on such a vast industrial scale.  Those deserts closer to the equator and major population centers would probably have competitive advantages of greater solar availability and lesser transport costs.

    In essence, converting today's incident sunlight for our needs, rather than pumping / mining fossil fuels (which are really long ago solar energy that was bio captured and "sequestered" within the earth).
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: $/BTU; $/KWH; efficiency
      DJTal on 02/25/2008 at 4:51 AM
      Posts:
      116
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      The assumption that carbon neutral energy is the solution to global warming is wrong . The solution HAS to be carbon negative , and the only realistic way to achieve that is using plant growth both on land and in the oceans . The biofuel industry can contribute to this by gasifying biomass to produce syngas and charcoal . The charcoal can then be used as a soil improver , leading to increased plant growth per acre and carbon remaing locked up in the soil for thousands of years .

      I agree that solar power is one of the best renewables . If solar power plants are situated in arid parts of the world then solar panels can provide shade for plants and animals growing underneath and actually lead to an increase in the growth of vegetation .

      There aren't any renwables that are bad , we just need to learn how to use them in ways that benefit the wider environment .
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: $/BTU; $/KWH; efficiency
        nekote on 02/25/2008 at 6:38 PM
        Posts:
        120
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
        Carbon *negative* solution?
        In truth, that could be just what will be required.

        How about increasing the proposed daily solar capture and conversion to "convenient" energy forms beyond "current" needs and pump the excess collection (in suitable versions) *back* into all those tens of thousands of oil and gas wells and coal mines that we have been harvesting fossil fuels from?  Say, put 10% of the algae oil harvest back into the ground, in a recoverable way.

        In essence, "repaying" / re-sequestering the carbon based stored ancient sunlight we have been using to fuel our modern industrial era.

        In effect, creating a vast "strategic petroleum reserve", in many places around the earth.

        This would have the advantage of being able to, at worse, flare it off to regain CO2, should Global Cooling ever become the fear / reality du jour.

        I don't think it wise to sequester CO2 in "permanent" ways that are going to make it difficult to *boost* CO2 / GHG, should that side of the coin ever befall mankind.
        Rate this comment: 12345
  • algae efficiency
    solar nano on 02/24/2008 at 9:45 AM
    Posts:
    9
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    50% of algae biomass can be made into biodiesel using the Valcent, closed loop method of production. That 50% can produce 33,000 gallons of biodiesel/acre/year.  The other 50% can be used as protein/carbohydrate animal feed, or the 25% carbohydrate can be turned into ethanol. 6,000 square miles of arid land can produce energy for all of our transportation and electrical needs and, feed allot of animals while doing it. No fossil fuel! People who continue to promote fossil fuel, are the real fossils! Wake up!  Go to Google and get on their "Algae Biofuel", "News Alert".  It will open your eyes wide open.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: algae efficiency
      nekote on 02/25/2008 at 7:04 PM
      Posts:
      120
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      I do actively follow Valcent, VertiGro and other algae possibilities.

      50% conversion and 33,000 gallons / acre / year certainly would be an answer to many energy hungry prayers.

      But nobody's there, yet, as much as they and the non-oil producers might wish.

      I got my fingers crossed that algae / PV will soon genuinely attain numbers like that, on a vast industrial scale.

      That should transform some (hot) desert rich locations - southwest USA, Australia, Saharan Africa, the Kalahari - from barren wastelands into productive energy collection regions.

      That ain't gonna' make current oil producers very happy - having new competitors whose "well" never runs dry, once the inital capital is invested.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Sugar source
    go_solar on 02/25/2008 at 8:09 PM
    Posts:
    1
    See http://www.brightcove.tv/title.jsp?title=1388770133&channel=32419714 , for video titled, "Solazyme Unveils Renewable Biodiesel Derived from Algae...
    Jan 23, 2008" that talks about the source of sugar in this algae biofuel process. As some have speculated - it's from waste carbohydrates. I picked this up on Google's alert on algae biofuel.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Sugar Source
    solar nano on 02/26/2008 at 9:51 PM
    Posts:
    9
    Avg