Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement
[1] 2 Next »

Friday, February 15, 2008

Mobile Carriers See Gold in Femtocells

If consumers buy in to private wireless phone networks, the industry could save money.

By John Borland

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
Can you hear me now? Airvana's HubBub femtocell (above) could provide better cellular reception inside homes and offices.
Credit: Airvana

On its face, it sounds like a company's technological fantasy: a product sold to customers that will also save the business itself money.

That's roughly the attraction of a young wireless phone technology called femtocells, which promise to give homes and businesses their own private wireless phone networks.

Similar in concept to the Wi-Fi routers that many people use to blanket their homes with wireless Internet access, these little boxes instead provide a network for carrying the voice and high-speed data services of mobile phones. They're designed to give bandwidth-hungry cell-phone subscribers the strongest possible connections at home. But by keeping those customers off the main mobile network and using home broadband connections to transfer data, they could wind up saving the phone companies money, too.

It's no wonder, then, that equipment vendors say that mobile phone companies are rushing into this market--with technology and even commercial trials beginning on both sides of the Atlantic--even before standards have been set or final technological hurdles cleared.

"Usually in the networking business, you build equipment, and then drum up demand," says Paul Callahan, vice president of business development for Airvana, a femtocell equipment vendor. "This time, demand is already really strong."

The femtocell buzz is part of a broader, years-long push by mobile phone companies to persuade their customers to use cell phones instead of landlines for all their communications needs, and increasingly to use their cells for third-generation (3G) applications such as Web surfing, downloading music, and watching videos.

One hurdle, phone companies say, is that mobile phone coverage inside homes and businesses often isn't as good as it is outside. Some homes are in coverage shadows or have thick apartment walls that impede transmissions. In addition, the Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (W-CDMA) technology used for 3G services by T-Mobile and AT&T in the United States transmits at a higher frequency than does its predecessor, so it has a harder time penetrating walls.

A femtocell would relieve this problem--in theory. Instead of relying on the mobile phone's nearest cellular tower (known in the industry as a base station), which might also be serving scores of other callers at the same time, a customer would have her own private, high-quality cell-phone connection.

"Our goal is to get to a place where our services are available to all users at all times," says John Carvalho, head of core network innovation for Telefónica O2 Europe, which announced femtocell trials this week.

Boosters of the technology paint femtocell as technology that benefits everyone. Customers get a fast, reliable broadband phone connection at home, and the mobile phone companies get to offload a small piece of their infrastructure investments to their customers.

In effect, every customer who buys and installs his own home femtocell would reduce the load on the carrier's local macro network. The femtocell itself serves as an alternative base station, broadcasting and receiving ordinary wireless signals from cell phones that the femtocell owner permits. This is a strikingly attractive idea, particularly to carriers in big cities that find their networks often overloaded, and find that local regulations or public opinion makes it difficult and costly to set up new antennas.

By using a femtocell, customers will send their voice and data traffic out their own DSL, cable, or fiber connection to the Internet, and then to the carrier's network. This will also reduce the load on the land-based data networks that carry voice and data traffic from the mobile phone companies' base stations to their own central switching facilities. That, in turn, could translate into less infrastructure investment.

Yet all of this will happen only if customers see enough benefit to buying themselves a femtocell--and for now, that's the biggest flaw in this rosy scenario, analysts say.

"What's in it for the user?" asks Keith Nissen, an analyst with the In-Stat research firm. "That's the big question. Right now, there isn't enough."

[1] 2 Next »

Resources

Events

Comments

  • Femtocells
    SoundsGr8tome on 02/15/2008 at 2:05 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    1/5
    Isn't there a technology called...ahh...err.....oh yeah.....WIMAX, that will pretty much kill the Femtocell situation IF... WIMAX does WHAT it's supposed to do...WHEN it supposed to?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Pay for Network Use, Paying for Broadband Use
      Jonathan.Armesto on 07/03/2008 at 9:29 PM
      Posts:
      2
      Avg Rating:
      1/5
      "They're designed to give bandwidth-hungry cell-phone subscribers the strongest possible connections at home. But by keeping those customers off the main mobile network and using home broadband connections to transfer data, they could wind up saving the phone companies money, too."


      This is exactly what Microsoft does with most new software released on the Xbox 360, when players decide to play online using Xbox Live. The Service, Xbox Live, costs a varied amount to use, just like wireless phone carriers. However, instead of hosting the connection on Microsoft's Servers, the connection is hosted over the customers Broadband connection.

      Why, then, should the customer pay someone else, when it is the Customers own Broadband connection that is use by the service?
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Femtocells
      burnside on 07/06/2008 at 7:09 AM
      Posts:
      7
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      SG82me,

      If I were a communications giant beginning to encounter the WiMAX buildout in major markets, I believe I'd promote almost anything 'new' to get clients into annual contracts and, preferably, some equipment purchases.

      But that would be cynical of me. Heh.

      Seriously, though I look forward to combining internet and telecommunications on WiMAX when it goes live in my city, I'm also interested to see what competing services will offer up in competition. It will need to be more inviting than femtocells, I'll wager.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • T-Mobile and AT&T use GSM not W-CDMA
    attoigo on 02/15/2008 at 8:56 AM
    Posts:
    2
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    The writer may have this confused regarding the underlying technologies that providers in the US are using. Sprint and Verizon use the W-CDMA network technology. T-Mobile and AT&T use GSM.
    There could also be issues regarding this if someone sets up a Femtocell at their home and others connect to it because it is the only signal available, the owner or host providing Femtocell access will in essence be sharing their bandwidth (broadband) connection with other cell phone users. This is the same as sharing WiFi service and having half the neighborhood use your connection and not knowing it. It is fine as long as you understand that this is how it works and that you will be giving up part of your bandwidth for the cell access of others.The other side of things is regarding WiMax services. WiMax does not cover everywhere the same way that cellular phone services do not.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: T-Mobile and AT&T use GSM not W-CDMA
      winterspan on 02/16/2008 at 9:52 PM
      Posts:
      4
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      You are wrong. The author is talking about AT&T's (and soon to be T-Mobile's) 3G UMTS service WHICH IS W-CDMA and runs on top of their older 2G GSM service. W-CDMA is only used as the air interface and so isn't truly related to the actual CDMA service which is used by Verizon and Sprint.

      On the subject of this article, this sounds like a BIG LOAD OF CRAP. Like I'm actually going to PAY for a box that allows the cellphone company to offload their network responsibility ONTO MY BROADBAND PIPE? Are you kidding me? Maybe if they sent the box to me free WITH $100 and a 75% discount on monthly minute fess. Even then, it's still a ripoff. This is a TERRIBLE solution for the customer.

      A much BETTER SOLUTION is to purchase a smart phone that also uses has a WiFi chipset. When you are at home, you can then simply make phone calls with your existing cell phone that run over the internet connection. This is ALREADY available.

      If you want no-setup, same-number, seamless switchover from cellular to Wifi, etc, there is already a product able to do this. Tmobile offers it, called TMobile Hotspot@home. It does exactly what the article is about. It allows Wifi based calling on your existing phone with seamless transfer and no fuss other than installing a small box.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Home Wireless
    oconnmic on 02/15/2008 at 10:36 AM
    Posts:
    21
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    I have always had difficulties using wireless inside buildings.  If you live in a basement apartment or concrete and brick faced condo you might appreciate something like this.  Especially if it's only $50 for the hardware and you can save on your montly wireless bill.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Home Wireless
      Maddogmc on 02/15/2008 at 10:41 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      Same story here.  My home is ICF construction with a stucco exterior.  Cell phone service inside my home is marginal at best.  I would happily pay a reasonable fee to get reliable service inside my home.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: Home Wireless
        avibull on 02/16/2008 at 12:23 AM
        Posts:
        1
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
        It should really catch on in India where all the cell phone networks are overloaded because of unbelievable demand. Greater bandwidth would be the icing on the cake- I hardly get reception because of inadequate number of base stations in my area due to local regulations. I would definitely buy a femtocell thats priced similar to a g wifi router.
        And cell phones would just need a software upgrade for password-enabling to prevent femto-network freeloaders.
        Better yet, why not make a Wifi cum Femtocell Router? Less no. of devices! It can have your ADSL modem too.
        Rate this comment: 12345
  • femtocells
    adhenri on 02/19/2008 at 9:47 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    Femtocells are a great solution to poor indoor cellular service becuase a tower is not close enough or because a cellular signal can not effectively penetrate a building. They make no sense when a tower is close enough to provide a strong signal.

    Not all solutions fit all consumers. I like knowing I have an option for good home service if I ever move to a home with poor coverage.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Skip Roaming Charges
    jazambra on 02/19/2008 at 5:00 PM
    Posts:
    3
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    An additional benefit would come if the femtocell could travel with us and avoid the very high roaming charges when in anothe network.
    I would be very nice to have it in hotel lobbys.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Another Solution to Poor Cellphone Coverage in Homes
    dolimoon6000 on 02/20/2008 at 2:48 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    1/5
    Instead of battling with poor cell phone coverage in homes or installing a box, one could make use of a service called Area775 from SIPphone. This service allows a user to seamless transfer calls from cell phones to land lines or PC's that use VOIP even in the middle of a phone conversation without the other party knowing it.

    While this service does not offer the convenience of using a single device (cell phone) for communication as in TMobile's Hotspot@home, it provides a means of receiving the highest quality voice service whether at home, in the office, or outside regardless of what cell phone carrier one has.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Location
    weee on 02/20/2008 at 7:23 AM
    Posts:
    33
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    I understand that one of the big unanswered questions on Femtocells is going to be whether the units are going to be sold with restraints of where they can be used and whether they'll have geolocation units built in to ensure that they're used in the location they're sold to.
    There's also going to be complexities in hand-offs which will need to be addressed before success is in sight...
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • The biggest flaw
    Gcanno on 02/25/2008 at 3:22 AM
    Posts:
    7
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    The Gold these companies see is sitting at the bottom of your pockets.I think that the thought of monopolizing a technology which can change the way we treat each other as human beings is orwellian.The only way societes can evolve, is by recognizing themselves as but one part of a larger whole.This applies to every level of society.Providing a free platform for an individual to gain knowledge and interface will someday be a Human Right.
    That said, MIT's approach is the best Meraki.com
    Our Story
    A little about Meraki
    Meraki’s mission is to bring affordable Internet access to the next billion people. Meraki’s new approach to wireless networking empowers individuals and groups to bring access to local communities, anywhere in the world.

    Meraki has focused on changing the economics of access since its beginning as a MIT Ph.D. research project that provided wireless access to graduate students.

    Using their research, Meraki got its start at a low-income housing community in the US. News about Meraki’s products spread by word of mouth into over 25 countries around the world. Every day, new Meraki networks bring access to locations ranging from urban apartment complexes in London to villages in India.

    Meraki is based in Mountain View, California, and is backed in part by Google and Sequoia Capital.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Adding guest?
    rhemmanur on 06/04/2008 at 3:16 PM
    Posts:
    1
    I think it'll be a really cool choice if you can add your guests who come to visit you onto your femto network as well... ofcourse the question of different carriers comes here... I think a given femtocell should be able to support all the carriers based on the user's choice then many more consumers would put their money on it...
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Pay for Network Use, Paying for Broadband Use
    Jonathan.Armesto on 07/03/2008 at 6:17 PM
    Posts:
    2
    Avg Rating:
    1/5
    "They're designed to give bandwidth-hungry cell-phone subscribers the strongest possible connections at home. But by keeping those customers off the main mobile network and using home broadband connections to transfer data, they could wind up saving the phone companies money, too."


    This is exactly what Microsoft does with most new software released on the Xbox 360, when players decide to play online using Xbox Live. The Service, Xbox Live, costs a varied amount to use, just like wireless phone carriers. However, instead of hosting the connection on Microsoft's Servers, the connection is hosted over the customers Broadband connection.

    Why, then, should the customer pay someone else, when it is the Customers own Broadband connection that is use by the service?
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • time to hack this hardware
    wylde brunby on 08/06/2008 at 4:26 AM
    Posts:
    1
    We could profitably buy the femtocell hardware and hack it to provide an ad hoc mesh network for peer to peer networking.

    This will enable us to bypass all efforts at censorship - Long Live Free Speech!
    Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review November/December 2008
Sun + Water = Fuel
An MIT chemist has opened the way to making hydrogen fuel from water using sunlight.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology