Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

March/April 2008

TR10: Wireless Power

Physicist Marin Soljacic is working toward a world of wireless electricity.

By Jennifer Chu

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

In the late 19th century, the realization that electricity could be coaxed to light up a bulb prompted a mad dash to determine the best way to distribute it. At the head of the pack was inventor Nikola Tesla, who had a grand scheme to beam elec­tricity around the world. Having difficulty imagining a vast infrastructure of wires extending into every city, building, and room, Tesla figured that wireless was the way to go. He drew up plans for a tower, about 57 meters tall, that he claimed would transmit power to points kilometers away, and even started to build one on Long Island. Though his team did some tests, funding ran out before the tower was completed. The promise of airborne power faded rapidly as the industrial world proved willing to wire up.

Wireless light: Marin Soljacic (top) and colleagues used magnetic resonance coupling to power a 60-watt light bulb. Tuned to the same frequency, two 60-centimeter copper coils can transmit electricity over a distance of two meters, through the air and around an obstacle (bottom).
Credit: AMPS/MIT Libraries (top); Bryan Christie Design (bottom)
Multimedia
•  View a few methods of wireless energy propagation.
•  Marin Soljacic on wireless power.
Who: Marin Soljacic, MIT
Definition: Wireless power technology transmits electricity to devices without the use of cables.
Impact: Any low-power device, such as a cell phone, iPod, or laptop, could recharge automatically simply by coming within range of a wireless power source, eliminating the need for multiple cables—and perhaps, eventually, for batteries.
Context: Eliminating the power cord would make today’s ubiquitous portable electronics truly wireless. A number of researchers and startups are making headway in this growing field.

Then, a few years ago, Marin Soljačić, an assistant professor of physics at MIT, was dragged out of bed by the insistent beeping of a cell phone. "This one didn't want to stop until you plugged it in for charging," says Soljačić. In his exhausted state, he wished the phone would just begin charging itself as soon as it was brought into the house.

So Soljačić started searching for ways to transmit power wirelessly. Instead of pursuing a long-distance scheme like Tesla's, he decided to look for midrange power transmission methods that could charge--or even power--portabl­e devices such as cell phones, PDAs, and laptops. He considered using radio waves, which effectively send information through the air, but found that most of their energy would be lost in space. More-targeted methods like lasers require a clear line of sight--and could have harmful effects on anything in their way. So Soljačić sought a method that was both efficient--able to directly power receivers without dissipating energy to the surrounding­s--and safe.

He eventually landed on the phenome­non of resonant coupling, in which two objects tuned to the same frequency exchange energy strongly but interact only weakly with other objects. A classic example is a set of wine glasses, each filled to a different level so that it vibrates at a different sound frequency. If a singer hits a pitch that matches the frequency of one glass, the glass might absorb so much acoustic energy that it will shatter; the other glasses remain unaffected.

Soljačić found magnetic resonance a promising means of electricity transfer because magnetic fields travel freely through air yet have little effect on the environment or, at the appropriate frequencies, on living beings. Working with MIT physics professors John Joannopoulos and Peter Fisher and three students, he devised a simple setup that wirelessly powered a 60-watt light bulb.

The researchers built two resonant copper coils and hung them from the ceiling, about two meters apart. When they plugged one coil into the wall, alternating current flowed through it, creating a magnetic field. The second coil, tuned to the same frequency and hooked to a light bulb, reso­nated with the magnetic field, generating an electric current that lit up the bulb--even with a thin wall between the coils.

Tags

MIT

Comments

  • Magnetic Resonance
    I worked for Telex Communications back in the late 90's, we did a similar thing using magnetic resonance for a short range wireless headset.  It was what I thought the precursor to bluetooth. It worked but was a power hog and while we made some products they never really caught on.  We worked with a Boston Company, Aura (http://www.auracomm.com/) who made a chipset for that, probably could do the same with power. 
    Rate this comment: 12345

    drthompson
    02/19/2008
    Posts:4
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: Magnetic Resonance
      Let's look at the fact that what Tesla was actually doing was tapping into the "Natural Grid". Think about this Teslas idea of AC came when times were simpler. We still use this today...the electric motor, for without we would be in the dark. Tesla was tapping into the natural electricity of the earth itself.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Namdac
      08/23/2008
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • Re: Magnetic Resonance
        No he wasn't.  Tesla built generators - motors moved by non-electrical means which convert that mechanical energy to electrical energy.  In that day the mechanical energy was coal-powered steam and in many cases today still is.  What "natural grid" you're referring to is a complete mystery.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        scarhawk
        06/26/2009
        Posts:8
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
  • Exciting research for 2008 or products in user testing since 2006
    As I untangle the mass of wire emmanating from under my desk its clear that the availability of wireless power will be great. However as far a powering small devices goes your MIT colleague has some catching up to do: http://www.splashpower.com/
    Rate this comment: 12345

    bseddon
    02/21/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: Exciting research for 2008 or products in user testing since 2006
      splashpower is based on inductive charging such as used by almost all electric toothbrushes now.  It works, but is much more limited than what the article describes: Charging within range of a transmitter. What the article describes would be much more flexible and useful than having to put an object in contact with a charging surface (though that's also useful, just less useful).

      There might be some concerns with EM radiation ... but in the article this is tuned resonance, presumably not tuned for human flesh ... and I never quite believe/believed that non-ionizing radiation (EM) can have an effect on the body short of a hugely powerful field since it sort of lacks a cause (cancer by scary magic). 

      As far as I know most meta-studies end up debunking EM as a cancer risk such as living close to high power lines -- no cancer risk. 
      Rate this comment: 12345

      GaryB
      02/24/2008
      Posts:71
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
    • wireless power transmission
      iam studying in engineering,electronics and communication,i want repoprt on wireless power transmission,please anyone in this blog send to my e-mail.e-mail address-Pradeepa.gn@gmail.com.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      pradeepa.gn
      03/28/2008
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      2/5
      • Re: wireless power transmission
        There have been some interesting projects concerning wireless power. I proposed an architecture to utilize this technology on a large scale in "A Cellular Wireless Power System Architecture" PhD Dissertation at NC A&T State University in Greensboro, NC. I think you would find it interesting.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        msacooke
        10/09/2008
        Posts:2
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
    • Re: Exciting research for 2008 or products in user testing since 2006
      Moving to this "wireless" power will not get rid of the wire underneath your desk.  You'll still have a wall adapter with a wire running to the dock.

      The only thing this system replaces is the physical metal connector on the dock.  Power falls off with the cube of distance, so moving the device more than a few inches from the dock effectively reduces the power available to the device to nothing.

      Meanwhile the wall adapter will have to get (much) bigger to make up for the efficiency loss across the wireless connection.  At 50% efficiency that means twice the power needed.  The product will get bigger and more expensive, it'll be more expensive to recharge, and the box will get heavier and more expensive to ship.

      All this so you can set your cellphone on a 6x6" pad instead of docking it in a cradle?  Is it really saving people that much effort?
      Rate this comment: 12345

      scarhawk
      06/27/2009
      Posts:8
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • This is new? No its not.
    Tesla did this decades ago. Why is this one of the most exciting new technologies of 2008 when its not even new?

    Its a very wasteful way to charge things up, besides. Also, who wants to share a room with a device constantly zapping you with powerful EM waves? I dont.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    danimalia
    02/22/2008
    Posts:4
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • cancer factor
    Wireless electricity is old technology and ignored due to cancer association with the electromagnetic waves.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    falcon
    02/24/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
  • Can our planet afford another technology with 30%-50% LOSS?
    Does anyone really believe we should push out technology that reduces the efficiency of electronic gadgets even further? If the average device uses 3 Watts and we have 3 billion devices, even an optimistic 30% loss in efficiency will cause the equivalent of more than 50 million tons of carbon dioxide annually - all just because we are too lazy and lethargic to plug it in?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ofoehr
    02/26/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: Can our planet afford another technology with 30%-50% LOSS?
      I agree that this could be a concern. Howeve,r it may also reduce electricity usage, depending upon how it is implemented. Currently I have a charger for my phone that is plugged in all the time. I only have the phone plugged in overnight. Suppose that I only draw electricity from this wireless charger when the cell phone needs the power and is in range. Would that be more (or less) efficient than having a charger plugged in 24/7?
      Rate this comment: 12345

      rabber
      02/26/2008
      Posts:2
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
    • Re: Can our planet afford another technology with 30%-50% LOSS?
      The insidious problem is that people would waste energy and not feel it much on their electric bills. It would appeal to consumers who love their gadgets and believe weakly in their own abilities to place those gadgets on rechargers. If this technology has a use, it may well benefit the military or NASA, but I'd hate to see it take off for consumer electronics. The added costs to cellphones and such along with a perceived health risk might make it a nonstarter anyways.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      MakeSense
      04/13/2008
      Posts:99
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • Wireless Power Transmission efficiency
    Wireless Power Transmission had been achieved by Nikola Tesla at the early beginning of the 1890's to the 1930's in USA as well as in Canada... but this technology had been worked out more then 10 years ago by the German physicist Dr Konstantin Meyl from Germany who made many lectures in Germany as well as in United States few years ago. He demonstrated the principles of the Wireless Transmission of Power based on Nikola Tesla early work (patents) and demonstrated as well the efficiency of this system which was very more efficient then what it is claiming here (more or less than 50%)...

    Here's his website for more details about his work. Some books, videos and working kits are available for demonstrations purposes...
    http://www.meyl.eu/go/index.php?dir=10_Home&page=1&sublevel=0
         
    Rate this comment: 12345

    pierrestm
    02/26/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • wireless power
    This would be ideal to power the "Bionic Contact Lens" I saw in a video on yahoo's home page today. They say lens is embedded with electronics that could conceivably provide zoom and night vision. Sorry, no x-ray or heat vision! :-) Still developmental, but a power source in your shirt pocket to power the contact lenses seems reasonable.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    wcfloyd
    02/26/2008
    Posts:9
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • re: eCoupled technology
    There's a Michigan-based company, Fulton Innovation, that's working with some pretty big names to get this technology into more than small device applications and charging pad solutions. In fact, they showed a wirelessly charged laptop at CES this year with the supporting infrastructure (a desk with a charging coil built in). They can also do high power applications, and all with very high efficiency. The technology is call eCoupled. You can see it at www.ecoupled.com.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jeeves
    03/06/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Wireless Cars?
    There are some interesting application I'd like to see some day.

    Bury a coil under parking spots (maybe hang them up somewhere?) and charge your car while you shop!

    Just some thoughts.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    b4b2
    03/06/2008
    Posts:9
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • What an incredible waste of electrical generating capacity; what an incredible increase to my monthly electric bill
    Do the math, please.  At 33% to 50% radiated loss in all the wrong directions, this corresponds to 1.5 to 2 times as many power plants and 1.5 to 2 times the monthly electric bill.

    Once this technology is widely deployed, imagine building 1.5 to 2 times as many COAL-fired or NUCLEAR-powered power-generating plants.  (Literally, pick your poison, please.)  Perhaps I can interest you in having a nuclear or coal power plant built literally across the street from your house?  They are really beatiful additions to your neighborhood!

    Also my $200 to $300 per month electric bill is not high enough.  I would like it to be 1.5 to 2 times bigger per month.  Oh yeah!  $300 to $600 per month!  That's what we all want!

    And for those of you who say only toothbrushes and cell phones will have this technology, think again.  Once it is cool to have wireless power, everything that takes less power than an oven or an air conditioner will be powered wirelessly.  It will get to where premium-priced wireless-powered products dominate over low-end wire-powered because they will command higher profit margins for the manufacturer and will bestow not only coolness but also be a status symbol of how large of a monthly electric bill the buyer can afford.  Therefore, wasted electricity that is raditated in all the wrong directions due to wireless-powered products will be a major percentage of the monthly electric bill and a major cause of building more electricity-generating plants.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    optikos
    03/12/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: What an incredible waste of electrical generating capacity; what an incredible increase to my monthly electric bill
      It's sad to think that there are way too many people out there thinking of the negative side of things and helping the lazy an lethargic people out there, instead of trying to help find a better solution. If you are going to complain and be one of those skeptics and doomsayers about RF, Cancer risks and the like, then go sit in a dark lit room away from everyone else who is at least attempting to find a better solution than trying to stop and add to the problem by not doing anything at all!

      If this could be done and still have less loss, then I could see this as an ideal way to use electricity. We are now (the US in particular) are starting to use more solar, wind and thermal means to power our homes. It can be done, but the technology and the people trying to come up with the ideas and ways to make such things a reality are limited. Time is what is helping make such things a reality. Even though it might be at least 100 years later, the thought is still working and continuing.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      BenAthar
      08/23/2008
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • TV trend
    This fits perfectly with the trend for wireless flat screen HDTVs.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    sculptor
    03/23/2008
    Posts:8
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • long way to go...
    Can't understand why there is all the discussion
    about powering all the home devices including tvs, bulbs and other fixed items wirelessly with a
    such a inefficient method (particularly when the energy prices are going up!). Mobile phones and
    defence applications seem realistic.
    Anyways I feel that the brains at MIT should focus
    more on solving more complex technical issues then revisitng old known ones (which anyways many companies are doing), unless of course they are making some revolutionary new approach which is kept unpublished.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    b.dutta.ee
    03/31/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Safety of rf exposure?
    Large rf magnetic fields can cause induced currents and electrical fields in any conductors near the transmitter. The effect of these induced fields and currents can be anything from sparking and local heating of dielectric materials to severe burns if the configuration of the conductors is not well controlled.

    I'd like to see some specific absorption rate estimations for the heating effects of biological tissues caused by the rf magnetic fields involved. In MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) an rf field strength of only 30 microteslas at 64 MHz might be large enough to be of concern even when pulsed at 5 % duty cycle. I'd be very careful in the vicinity of a transmission coil putting out a continuous rf field of 100 microteslas.

    The biological effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields at rf frequencies is a hot subject these days. The national limits of rf magnetic fields and specific absorption rates are quite low for the general population. The safety concerns should be taken into account already by the scientists involved with the project in the test laboratory.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    kfakfa
    04/11/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Nikola Tesla...
    When I see this, it reminds me of something that is somewhat of a large deal when talking about energy transmission.  Isn't just about everything that Nikola Tesla was about, wireless energy via resonant frequencies, its interesting that people are kind of catching on today... 100 years later... 
    Rate this comment: 12345

    CokeClassic2...
    05/26/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    • Re: Nikola Tesla...
      The same physical laws that made it impractical 100 years ago make it impractical today.  Power falls off with the cube of distance and no amount of R&D can change that.

      There's nothing to catch onto.  It's a cool idea, but it doesn't work in a way that's useful and affordable.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      scarhawk
      06/27/2009
      Posts:8
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • Wireless wired
    Most of what I see on these blogs are comments and ideas that require a source that uses physical energy sources, i.e., coal, gas, for powering AC which is in turn used to create wireless energy.
    I want to hear more from those who are experimenting with the electomagnetic field that surrounds the earth and getting energy directly from that!  No coal or gas fired plants, no high AC electric bills, etc.  We should be able to make a receiver for that type of energy, on a small enough scale for powering homes, businesses, vehicles, and more!  Even the lightning rods on our homes powered oldtime crystal radio sets so that we could hear radio transmisions.
    Health issues???  I am experienced in the total exhaustion in the morning caused by sleeping in the magnetic field created by a waterbed heater...I vowed never to do that again! This made me realize how our bodies are affected by our government approved electrical wiring in our homes.  I always feel more alive when there's no electrical current flowing and creating magnetic fields that hinder my Na+, Cl-, K+, etc. ions in my muscles.  So, if you want to be more energetic, turn the lights, TV, refrigerator, air conditioning OFF. :)  Now, I know that that is drastic, but try it!  You'll like it.  :)
    Meanwhile, why use scare tactics about Tesla's energy transmissions when he used HF anyway??  You need a higher frequency than RF (radio frequency) to get more power per wave.  Go there, and let me know what happens.  Who knows, maybe infrared or planetary / solar frequencies may be the next electric source?  Free, clean, safe...they are coming our way no matter what, so we might as well use it!
    Laverne
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Laverne
    07/22/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Wireless wired
      ... high frequency and much, much higher voltages which run cooler and permit smaller devices/appliances than our very low 60 hertz apparently where the key ingredients that Tesla and even Moray discussed and apparently got to work.  Smaller wires, more windings, spark gap generators, even cosmic ray energies. The possibilities are there. 
      Rate this comment: 12345

      bjd23
      06/16/2009
      Posts:1
  • Is it real!
    Wireless power has been a goal of mine for many years. I have developed products that will trickle charge a battery from the RF communications it receives to extend the useful battery life between charges. This is free energy because it is available anyway.  However to just power a product from any wireless source is very inefficient.

    I was recently laid off from my present job and had the opportunity to interview with the people at WiTricity. This experience revived my interest in solving the wireless power issue. Since I have time to tinker, I have recently developed a prototype wireless flat screen TV. My previous job was designing flat screens for media applications, so I had the parts.

    I am now working on making it more efficient, I have found that increasing the frequency of the transmission increases the length of transmission as well as the efficiency. I have a ways to go, but it’s a start and it works. As for the health issues, short range transmissions are harmless.
    Health issues with longer range transmissions will have to be determined.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    kvenvold
    07/22/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    • Re: Is it real!
      Wireless transmission of power can efficiently be achieved in a few ways. High efficiency LEDs or arrayed laser diodes could be aimed at high efficiency photovoltaic cells. Optimum efficiency could be reached if the LEDs would emmit light at the wavelenth otimum cell conversion efficiency. This may best done via infrared. Microwaves have been used for efficient transmission of power via a rectrenna. A rectenna is basically an array smiple tuned dipole antenna and a half or full wave rectifier. I could even envision a heat based engine run from laser or microwave beams. Of course there is the resonant transfer of power of which tesla coils and the new low power transfer are examples. However I suspect these will have very limited range, efficiency and power transfer capability. I would like to explore these possibilities especially for the prospect of running an elecrtic car with limitless range.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Stuball
      08/01/2008
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • Re: Is it real!
        How about a cellular system. Similar to what cell phone towers do. By handing off the load (car, etc.) during transit the issue of transmission distance can be diffused. Not to mention the reliability inherent with redundancy.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        msacooke
        10/09/2008
        Posts:2
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
  • pacemakers/implanted cardiac devices
    MRI?  No Thanks.  That could interfere with my device and could probably affect my heart rhythm.  I've been told that for medical testing purposes that I should not undergo MRI tests.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    mhydeis
    08/23/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Iranian guy has set a Record of 20 meters
    When i saw this invention in this site i was wondered who made this. but as an IRANIAN person i am proud to inform you all, that an Iranian Inventor had made a device that sends electricity more than 20 METERS!! that's a record that he had brake it. unfortunatly because his country isn't a superpower his invention had no reflection in the news. i just wanted to Inform his name here: Mohammad Reza Naad Ali Nejad. His invention has registered in number:52546 in IRAN.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Gagolist2
    11/15/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • MIT Scolarship
    I am a student in ITB(Bandung Institute of Technology-Indonesia). In this forum, I want get some help from all of you to finish my college in my university. By the way, i interested to studying in MIT. Please, show me how to get a scholarship to get studying there.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    andiaswad
    12/21/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    1/5
  • What about high capacity capacitors and batteries
    I believe I've seen or read something about a group in Texas that is working on a high capacity, capacitor that would charge up in just a few seconds to minutes, but would then be able to provide power for hours.

    I know it's not wireless, but it seems like it could be a step in the right direction.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    CStroliaDavi...
    01/08/2009
    Posts:5
    Avg Rating:
    4/5

Technology Review Magazine

The 10 Emerging Technologies of 2008
Technology Review presents its annual list of the 10 most exciting technologies.

FEATURES

A Technology Surges
In Iraq, soldiers conducting frontline street patrols finally get software tools that let them share findings and plan missions.
By David Talbot
Microsoft's Shiny New Toy
Photosynth is an application that's still a work in progress. It's dazzling, but what is it for?
By Jeffrey MacIntyre

Read more articles from this Issue

NOTEBOOKS FORWARD ESSAY TO MARKET Q&A REVIEWS HACK DEMO
Archives MIT News Subscribe Contact

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.