Technology Review - Published By MIT
[1] 2 Next »

March/April 2008

TR10: Wireless Power

Physicist Marin Soljacic is working toward a world of wireless electricity.

By Jennifer Chu

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
Wireless light: Marin Soljacic (top) and colleagues used magnetic resonance coupling to power a 60-watt light bulb. Tuned to the same frequency, two 60-centimeter copper coils can transmit electricity over a distance of two meters, through the air and around an obstacle (bottom).
Credit: AMPS/MIT Libraries (top); Bryan Christie Design (bottom)
Multimedia
•  View a few methods of wireless energy propagation.
•  Marin Soljacic on wireless power.
Who: Marin Soljacic, MIT
Definition: Wireless power technology transmits electricity to devices without the use of cables.
Impact: Any low-power device, such as a cell phone, iPod, or laptop, could recharge automatically simply by coming within range of a wireless power source, eliminating the need for multiple cables—and perhaps, eventually, for batteries.
Context: Eliminating the power cord would make today’s ubiquitous portable electronics truly wireless. A number of researchers and startups are making headway in this growing field.

In the late 19th century, the realization that electricity could be coaxed to light up a bulb prompted a mad dash to determine the best way to distribute it. At the head of the pack was inventor Nikola Tesla, who had a grand scheme to beam elec­tricity around the world. Having difficulty imagining a vast infrastructure of wires extending into every city, building, and room, Tesla figured that wireless was the way to go. He drew up plans for a tower, about 57 meters tall, that he claimed would transmit power to points kilometers away, and even started to build one on Long Island. Though his team did some tests, funding ran out before the tower was completed. The promise of airborne power faded rapidly as the industrial world proved willing to wire up.

Then, a few years ago, Marin Soljačić, an assistant professor of physics at MIT, was dragged out of bed by the insistent beeping of a cell phone. "This one didn't want to stop until you plugged it in for charging," says Soljačić. In his exhausted state, he wished the phone would just begin charging itself as soon as it was brought into the house.

So Soljačić started searching for ways to transmit power wirelessly. Instead of pursuing a long-distance scheme like Tesla's, he decided to look for midrange power transmission methods that could charge--or even power--portabl­e devices such as cell phones, PDAs, and laptops. He considered using radio waves, which effectively send information through the air, but found that most of their energy would be lost in space. More-targeted methods like lasers require a clear line of sight--and could have harmful effects on anything in their way. So Soljačić sought a method that was both efficient--able to directly power receivers without dissipating energy to the surrounding­s--and safe.

He eventually landed on the phenome­non of resonant coupling, in which two objects tuned to the same frequency exchange energy strongly but interact only weakly with other objects. A classic example is a set of wine glasses, each filled to a different level so that it vibrates at a different sound frequency. If a singer hits a pitch that matches the frequency of one glass, the glass might absorb so much acoustic energy that it will shatter; the other glasses remain unaffected.

Soljačić found magnetic resonance a promising means of electricity transfer because magnetic fields travel freely through air yet have little effect on the environment or, at the appropriate frequencies, on living beings. Working with MIT physics professors John Joannopoulos and Peter Fisher and three students, he devised a simple setup that wirelessly powered a 60-watt light bulb.

The researchers built two resonant copper coils and hung them from the ceiling, about two meters apart. When they plugged one coil into the wall, alternating current flowed through it, creating a magnetic field. The second coil, tuned to the same frequency and hooked to a light bulb, reso­nated with the magnetic field, generating an electric current that lit up the bulb--even with a thin wall between the coils.

[1] 2 Next »
March/April

Would you like to read more articles from the March/April issue?

This article is from the March/April Issue of Technology Review. To read other articles from this issue simply register for My.TechnologyReview.com. It's free.

Subscribe today and save up to 41% »

Resources

Events

Tags

MIT

Comments

  • Magnetic Resonance
    drthompson on 02/19/2008 at 9:51 AM
    Posts:
    4
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    I worked for Telex Communications back in the late 90's, we did a similar thing using magnetic resonance for a short range wireless headset.  It was what I thought the precursor to bluetooth. It worked but was a power hog and while we made some products they never really caught on.  We worked with a Boston Company, Aura (http://www.auracomm.com/) who made a chipset for that, probably could do the same with power. 
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Magnetic Resonance
      Namdac on 08/23/2008 at 6:17 PM
      Posts:
      1
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      Let's look at the fact that what Tesla was actually doing was tapping into the "Natural Grid". Think about this Teslas idea of AC came when times were simpler. We still use this today...the electric motor, for without we would be in the dark. Tesla was tapping into the natural electricity of the earth itself.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Exciting research for 2008 or products in user testing since 2006
    bseddon on 02/21/2008 at 5:34 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    As I untangle the mass of wire emmanating from under my desk its clear that the availability of wireless power will be great. However as far a powering small devices goes your MIT colleague has some catching up to do: http://www.splashpower.com/
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Exciting research for 2008 or products in user testing since 2006
      GaryB on 02/24/2008 at 7:41 PM
      Posts:
      42
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      splashpower is based on inductive charging such as used by almost all electric toothbrushes now.  It works, but is much more limited than what the article describes: Charging within range of a transmitter. What the article describes would be much more flexible and useful than having to put an object in contact with a charging surface (though that's also useful, just less useful).

      There might be some concerns with EM radiation ... but in the article this is tuned resonance, presumably not tuned for human flesh ... and I never quite believe/believed that non-ionizing radiation (EM) can have an effect on the body short of a hugely powerful field since it sort of lacks a cause (cancer by scary magic). 

      As far as I know most meta-studies end up debunking EM as a cancer risk such as living close to high power lines -- no cancer risk. 
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • wireless power transmission
      pradeepa.gn on 03/28/2008 at 4:53 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      iam studying in engineering,electronics and communication,i want repoprt on wireless power transmission,please anyone in this blog send to my e-mail.e-mail address-Pradeepa.gn@gmail.com.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: wireless power transmission
        msacooke on 10/09/2008 at 10:23 PM
        Posts:
        2
        Avg Rating:
        5/5
        There have been some interesting projects concerning wireless power. I proposed an architecture to utilize this technology on a large scale in "A Cellular Wireless Power System Architecture" PhD Dissertation at NC A&T State University in Greensboro, NC. I think you would find it interesting.
        Rate this comment: 12345
  • This is new? No its not.
    danimalia on 02/22/2008 at 3:09 AM
    Posts:
    4
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    Tesla did this decades ago. Why is this one of the most exciting new technologies of 2008 when its not even new?

    Its a very wasteful way to charge things up, besides. Also, who wants to share a room with a device constantly zapping you with powerful EM waves? I dont.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • cancer factor
    falcon on 02/24/2008 at 2:37 PM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    Wireless electricity is old technology and ignored due to cancer association with the electromagnetic waves.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Can our planet afford another technology with 30%-50% LOSS?
    ofoehr on 02/26/2008 at 1:43 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    Does anyone really believe we should push out technology that reduces the efficiency of electronic gadgets even further? If the average device uses 3 Watts and we have 3 billion devices, even an optimistic 30% loss in efficiency will cause the equivalent of more than 50 million tons of carbon dioxide annually - all just because we are too lazy and lethargic to plug it in?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Can our planet afford another technology with 30%-50% LOSS?
      rabber on 02/26/2008 at 8:50 AM
      Posts:
      2
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      I agree that this could be a concern. Howeve,r it may also reduce electricity usage, depending upon how it is implemented. Currently I have a charger for my phone that is plugged in all the time. I only have the phone plugged in overnight. Suppose that I only draw electricity from this wireless charger when the cell phone needs the power and is in range. Would that be more (or less) efficient than having a charger plugged in 24/7?
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Can our planet afford another technology with 30%-50% LOSS?
      MakeSense on 04/13/2008 at 10:21 AM
      Posts:
      77
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      The insidious problem is that people would waste energy and not feel it much on their electric bills. It would appeal to consumers who love their gadgets and believe weakly in their own abilities to place those gadgets on rechargers. If this technology has a use, it may well benefit the military or NASA, but I'd hate to see it take off for consumer electronics. The added costs to cellphones and such along with a perceived health risk might make it a nonstarter anyways.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Wireless Power Transmission efficiency
    pierrestm on 02/26/2008 at 9:58 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    Wireless Power Transmission had been achieved by Nikola Tesla at the early beginning of the 1890's to the 1930's in USA as well as in Canada... but this technology had been worked out more then 10 years ago by the German physicist Dr Konstantin Meyl from Germany who made many lectures in Germany as well as in United States few years ago. He demonstrated the principles of the Wireless Transmission of Power based on Nikola Tesla early work (patents) and demonstrated as well the efficiency of this system which was very more efficient then what it is claiming here (more or less than 50%)...

    Here's his website for more details about his work. Some books, videos and working kits are available for demonstrations purposes...
    http://www.meyl.eu/go/index.php?dir=10_Home&page=1&sublevel=0
         
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • wireless power
    wcfloyd on 02/26/2008 at 11:43 AM
    Posts:
    4
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    This would be ideal to power the "Bionic Contact Lens" I saw in a video on yahoo's home page today. They say lens is embedded with electronics that could conceivably provide zoom and night vision. Sorry, no x-ray or heat vision! :-) Still developmental, but a power source in your shirt pocket to power the contact lenses seems reasonable.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • re: eCoupled technology
    jeeves on 03/06/2008 at 11:51 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    There's a Michigan-based company, Fulton Innovation, that's working with some pretty big names to get this technology into more than small device applications and charging pad solutions. In fact, they showed a wirelessly charged laptop at CES this year with the supporting infrastructure (a desk with a charging coil built in). They can also do high power applications, and all with very high efficiency. The technology is call eCoupled. You can see it at www.ecoupled.com.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Wireless Cars?
    b4b2 on 03/06/2008 at 6:37 PM
    Posts:
    9
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    There are some interesting application I'd like to see some day.

    Bury a coil under parking spots (maybe hang them up somewhere?) and charge your car while you shop!

    Just some thoughts.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • What an incredible waste of electrical generating capacity; what an incredible increase to my monthly electric bill
    optikos on 03/12/2008 at 10:32 PM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    Do the math, please.  At 33% to 50% radiated loss in all the wrong directions, this corresponds to 1.5 to 2 times as many power plants and 1.5 to 2 times the monthly electric bill.

    Once this technology is widely deployed, imagine building 1.5 to 2 times as many COAL-fired or NUCLEAR-powered power-generating plants.  (Literally, pick your poison, please.)  Perhaps I can interest you in having a nuclear or coal power plant built literally across the street from your house?  They are really beatiful additions to your neighborhood!

    Also my $200 to $300 per month electric bill is not high enough.  I would like it to be 1.5 to 2 times bigger per month.  Oh yeah!  $300 to $600 per month!  That's what we all want!

    And for those of you who say only toothbrushes and cell phones will have this technology, think again.  Once it is cool to have wireless power, everything that takes less power than an oven or an air conditioner will be powered wirelessly.  It will get to where premium-priced wireless-powered products dominate over low-end wire-powered because they will command higher profit margins for the manufacturer and will bestow not only coolness but also be a status symbol of how large of a monthly electric bill the buyer can afford.  Therefore, wasted electricity that is raditated in all the wrong directions due to wireless-powered products will be a major percentage of the monthly electric bill and a major cause of building more electricity-generating plants.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: What an incredible waste of electrical generating capacity; what an incredible increase to my monthly electric bill
      BenAthar on 08/23/2008 at 11:29 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      It's sad to think that there are way too many people out there thinking of the negative side of things and helping the lazy an lethargic people out there, instead of trying to help find a better solution. If you are going to complain and be one of those skeptics and doomsayers about RF, Cancer risks and the like, then go sit in a dark lit room away from everyone else who is at least attempting to find a better solution than trying to stop and add to the problem by not doing anything at all!

      If this could be done and still have less loss, then I could see this as an ideal way to use electricity. We are now (the US in particular) are starting to use more solar, wind and thermal means to power our homes. It can be done, but the technology and the people trying to come up with the ideas and ways to make such things a reality are limited. Time is what is helping make such things a reality. Even though it might be at least 100 years later, the thought is still working and continuing.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • TV trend
    sculptor on 03/23/2008 at 2:19 AM
    Posts:
    8
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    This fits perfectly with the trend for wireless flat screen HDTVs.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • long way to go...
    b.dutta.ee on 03/31/2008 at 8:19 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    Can't understand why there is all the discussion
    about powering all the home devices including tvs, bulbs and other fixed items wirelessly with a
    such a inefficient method (particularly when the energy prices are going up!). Mobile phones and
    defence applications seem realistic.
    Anyways I feel that the brains at MIT should focus
    more on solving more complex technical issues then revisitng old known ones (which anyways many companies are doing), unless of course they are making some revolutionary new approach which is kept unpublished.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Safety of rf exposure?
    kfakfa on 04/11/2008 at 3:40 PM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    Large rf magnetic fields can cause induced currents and electrical fields in any conductors near the transmitter. The effect of these induced fields and currents can be anything from sparking and local heating of dielectric materials to severe burns if the configuration of the conductors is not well controlled.

    I'd like to see some specific absorption rate estimations for the heating effects of biological tissues caused by the rf magnetic fields involved. In MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) an rf field strength of only 30 microteslas at 64 MHz might be large enough to be of concern even when pulsed at 5 % duty cycle. I'd be very careful in the vicinity of a transmission coil putting out a continuous rf field of 100 microteslas.

    The biological effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields at rf frequencies is a hot subject these days. The national limits of rf magnetic fields and specific absorption rates are quite low for the general population. The safety concerns should be taken into account already by the scientists involved with the project in the test laboratory.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Nikola Tesla...
    CokeClassic21 on 05/26/2008 at 4:53 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    When I see this, it reminds me of something that is somewhat of a large deal when talking about energy transmission.  Isn't just about everything that Nikola Tesla was about, wireless energy via resonant frequencies, its interesting that people are kind of catching on today... 100 years later... 
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Wireless wired
    Laverne on 07/22/2008 at 4:32 PM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    Most of what I see on these blogs are comments and ideas that require a source that uses physical energy sources, i.e., coal, gas, for powering AC which is in turn used to create wireless energy.
    I want to hear more from those who are experimenting with the electomagnetic field that surrounds the earth and getting energy directly from that!  No coal or gas fired plants, no high AC electric bills, etc.  We should be able to make a receiver for that type of energy, on a small enough scale for powering homes, businesses, vehicles, and more!  Even the lightning rods on our homes powered oldtime crystal radio sets so that we could hear radio transmisions.
    Health issues???  I am experienced in the total exhaustion in the morning caused by sleeping in the magnetic field created by a waterbed heater...I vowed never to do that again! This made me realize how our bodies are affected by our government approved electrical wiring in our homes.  I always feel more alive when there's no electrical current flowing and creating magnetic fields that hinder my Na+, Cl-, K+, etc. ions in my muscles.  So, if you want to be more energetic, turn the lights, TV, refrigerator, air conditioning OFF. :)  Now, I know that that is drastic, but try it!  You'll like it.  :)
    Meanwhile, why use scare tactics about Tesla's energy transmissions when he used HF anyway??  You need a higher frequency than RF (radio frequency) to get more power per wave.  Go there, and let me know what happens.  Who knows, maybe infrared or planetary / solar frequencies may be the next electric source?  Free, clean, safe...they are coming our way no matter what, so we might as well use it!
    Laverne
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Is it real!
    kvenvold on 07/22/2008 at 9:59 PM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    Wireless power has been a goal of mine for many years. I have developed products that will trickle charge a battery from the RF communications it receives to extend the useful battery life between charges. This is free energy because it is available anyway.  However to just power a product from any wireless source is very inefficient.

    I was recently laid off from my present job and had the opportunity to interview with the people at WiTricity. This experience revived my interest in solving the wireless power issue. Since I have time to tinker, I have recently developed a prototype wireless flat screen TV. My previous job was designing flat screens for media applications, so I had the parts.

    I am now working on making it more efficient, I have found that increasing the frequency of the transmission increases the length of transmission as well as the efficiency. I have a ways to go, but it’s a start and it works. As for the health issues, short range transmissions are harmless.
    Health issues with longer range transmissions will have to be determined.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Is it real!
      Stuball on 08/01/2008 at 10:08 PM
      Posts:
      1
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      Wireless transmission of power can efficiently be achieved in a few ways. High efficiency LEDs or arrayed laser diodes could be aimed at high efficiency photovoltaic cells. Optimum efficiency could be reached if the LEDs would emmit light at the wavelenth otimum cell conversion efficiency. This may best done via infrared. Microwaves have been used for efficient transmission of power via a rectrenna. A rectenna is basically an array smiple tuned dipole antenna and a half or full wave rectifier. I could even envision a heat based engine run from laser or microwave beams. Of course there is the resonant transfer of power of which tesla coils and the new low power transfer are examples. However I suspect these will have very limited range, efficiency and power transfer capability. I would like to explore these possibilities especially for the prospect of running an elecrtic car with limitless range.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: Is it real!
        msacooke on 10/09/2008 at 10:29 PM
        Posts:
        2
        Avg Rating:
        5/5
        How about a cellular system. Similar to what cell phone towers do. By handing off the load (car, etc.) during transit the issue of transmission distance can be diffused. Not to mention the reliability inherent with redundancy.
        Rate this comment: 12345
  • pacemakers/implanted cardiac devices
    mhydeis on 08/23/2008 at 1:05 PM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    MRI?  No Thanks.  That could interfere with my device and could probably affect my heart rhythm.  I've been told that for medical testing purposes that I should not undergo MRI tests.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Iranian guy has set a Record of 20 meters
    Gagolist2 on 11/15/2008 at 7:19 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    When i saw this invention in this site i was wondered who made this. but as an IRANIAN person i am proud to inform you all, that an Iranian Inventor had made a device that sends electricity more than 20 METERS!! that's a record that he had brake it. unfortunatly because his country isn't a superpower his invention had no reflection in the news. i just wanted to Inform his name here: Mohammad Reza Naad Ali Nejad. His invention has registered in number:52546 in IRAN.
    Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review November/December 2008