The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Fuel fibers: A bundle of hollow fibers is the heart of a new process for making ethanol from sources other than corn. Organic materials are heated up to form a mixture of hydrogen, carbon dioxide, and carbon monoxide. When the pictured bioreactor is in operation, the gases flow through the center of the fibers and feed bacteria growing on the outside. The bacteria convert the gases into ethanol.
Kevin Bullis
GM teams with a startup aiming to produce low-cost biofuels.
Yesterday at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit, General Motors announced a partnership with Coskata of Warrenville, IL, a new company that claims it can make ethanol from wood chips, grass, and trash--including old tires--for a dollar a gallon. That's significantly less than it costs to make the biofuel from corn grain, which is the source of almost all the ethanol made in the United States.
Coskata executives, who until the announcement had kept the company's existence and technology under wraps, say they have developed a hybrid approach involving both thermochemical and biological processes for making ethanol. Until now, most researchers have focused on developing either thermochemical or biological methods. Coskata says that besides being cheaper than other ethanol production processes under development, its technology uses less energy and water.
GM will give financial, technical, and marketing support to Coskata to help it scale up its process, which so far has been demonstrated only at the lab scale. Coskata is completing a pilot-scale ethanol production facility and will announce locations for a 40,000-gallon-per-year facility and a 100-million-gallon-per-year commercial-scale plant later this year.
Coskata joins a number of other companies looking for ways to make biofuels from alternative sources. A new federal mandate, signed into law late last month, calls for 36 billion gallons of biofuels to be produced by 2022; of that, 21 billion gallons is to come from sources other than corn grain. But so far technology for making ethanol from such feedstocks has not been proved commercially.
The Coskata process begins with gasification, a well-known technology that involves heating up a wide range of organic materials until their components disassociate and form synthesis gas, a mixture of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide. Then, instead of using chemical catalysts to convert the syngas into various alcohols as is done in conventional processes (see "Breaking Ground on Cellulosic Ethanol"), Coskata uses new strains of bacteria to convert it into ethanol. Since ethanol is the only product, the technique produces a better overall yield than catalytic processes. Bacteria are also easier to work with than catalysts in some ways. For example, they're not as particular about the ratio of gases in the syngas. "It is theoretically possible to feed our organism exclusively carbon monoxide and it will make ethanol from that," says Richard Tobey, vice president of R&D and engineering at Coskata. "You can't do that with the catalytic approaches."
Where do the bacteria get the energy from in order to grow ?....heat ? plus it seems incedibly complex to grow bacteria on some sort of fibrous material . Needs more explanation since the company website doesn't tell us much .
I believe the article stated, "It is theoretically possible to feed our organism exclusively carbon monoxide and it will make ethanol from that".
Carbon monoxide (CO) has more energy then carbon dioxide (CO2). Bacteria feed on CO and H20, converting it to Ethanol(C2H5) and carbon dioxide(CO2). 5(H2O) + 13(CO) => 2(C2H5) + 9(CO2) + energy
Burning the ethanol looks like 2(C2H5) + 13(O2) = 5(H20) + 4(CO2) + energy
Another article in TR suggested using compressed air to store energy for a vehicle. What is the feasibility of using both the chemical and the mechanical energy in compressed carbon monoxide?
Compressed 2(CO) + 1(O2) => 2(CO2) + energy + energy of compression.
The Cost of Gathering and Handling Biomass
I tend to doubt the cheap cost of this ethanol. This process resembles synfuel production from biomass. 70% of the cost of that cost-prohibitive process goes to collection, handling and preparation of the biomass. Why would this process not face the same costs?
Re: The Cost of Gathering and Handling Biomass
Producing ethanol from cellulosic material using gasification is the way to produce the cheapest ethanol . It been proven .
There's something missing here...
"It is theoretically possible to feed our organism exclusively carbon monoxide and it will make ethanol from that,"
Not without a bunch of hydrogen, it isn't!
Ethanol, C2H5OH, has three times as many atoms of hydrogen as it does of carbon, and six times as much hydrogen as oxygen. So I don't know how one could possibly make it "exclusively" from carbon monoxide.
Maybe that was taken out of context. But statements like this blow my suspension of disbelief out of the water.
Not without a bunch of hydrogen, it isn't!
Ethanol, C2H5OH, has three times as many atoms of hydrogen as it does of carbon, and six times as much hydrogen as oxygen. So I don't know how one could possibly make it "exclusively" from carbon monoxide.
It is completely true C2H5OH can not be made from strictly CO. I don't think the author considered water part of the organisms feed stock which it is. Chemist out there, please forgive my notations but wouldn't it take 2(CO) and 3(H2O) to make 1(C2H5OH) and 3(O2) oxygen molecule.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
kitk
76 Comments
down the entropy slope
Although this method seems simple, it still wastes a lot of energy potential. The molecules in the feed stock resemble the fuel output more than the intermediate syngas, and a lot of energy is used up in all these conversions. At best, I view this as a good way to dispose of trash.
Reply