Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Cheap Ethanol from Tires and Trash

GM teams with a startup aiming to produce low-cost biofuels.

By Kevin Bullis

Monday, January 14, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Yesterday at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit, General Motors announced a partnership with Coskata of Warrenville, IL, a new company that claims it can make ethanol from wood chips, grass, and trash--including old tires--for a dollar a gallon. That's significantly less than it costs to make the biofuel from corn grain, which is the source of almost all the ethanol made in the United States.

Fuel fibers: A bundle of hollow fibers is the heart of a new process for making ethanol from sources other than corn. Organic materials are heated up to form a mixture of hydrogen, carbon dioxide, and carbon monoxide. When the pictured bioreactor is in operation, the gases flow through the center of the fibers and feed bacteria growing on the outside. The bacteria convert the gases into ethanol.
Credit: Kevin Bullis

Coskata executives, who until the announcement had kept the company's existence and technology under wraps, say they have developed a hybrid approach involving both thermochemical and biological processes for making ethanol. Until now, most researchers have focused on developing either thermochemical or biological methods. Coskata says that besides being cheaper than other ethanol production processes under development, its technology uses less energy and water.

GM will give financial, technical, and marketing support to Coskata to help it scale up its process, which so far has been demonstrated only at the lab scale. Coskata is completing a pilot-scale ethanol production facility and will announce locations for a 40,000-gallon-per-year facility and a 100-million-gallon-per-year commercial-scale plant later this year.

Story continues below

Coskata joins a number of other companies looking for ways to make biofuels from alternative sources. A new federal mandate, signed into law late last month, calls for 36 billion gallons of biofuels to be produced by 2022; of that, 21 billion gallons is to come from sources other than corn grain. But so far technology for making ethanol from such feedstocks has not been proved commercially.

The Coskata process begins with gasification, a well-known technology that involves heating up a wide range of organic materials until their components disassociate and form synthesis gas, a mixture of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide. Then, instead of using chemical catalysts to convert the syngas into various alcohols as is done in conventional processes (see "Breaking Ground on Cellulosic Ethanol"), Coskata uses new strains of bacteria to convert it into ethanol. Since ethanol is the only product, the technique produces a better overall yield than catalytic processes. Bacteria are also easier to work with than catalysts in some ways. For example, they're not as particular about the ratio of gases in the syngas. "It is theoretically possible to feed our organism exclusively carbon monoxide and it will make ethanol from that," says Richard Tobey, vice president of R&D and engineering at Coskata. "You can't do that with the catalytic approaches."

Tags

biofuel

Comments

  • down the entropy slope
    Although this method seems simple, it still wastes a lot of energy potential. The molecules in the feed stock resemble the fuel output more than the intermediate syngas, and a lot of energy is used up in all these conversions. At best, I view this as a good way to dispose of trash.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    kitk
    01/14/2008
    Posts:65
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • .....?????
    Where do the bacteria get the energy from in order to grow ?....heat ? plus it seems incedibly complex to grow bacteria on some sort of fibrous material . Needs more explanation since the company website doesn't tell us much .
    Rate this comment: 12345

    DJTal
    01/14/2008
    Posts:129
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: .....?????
      I believe the article stated, "It is theoretically possible to feed our organism exclusively carbon monoxide and it will make ethanol from that".

      Although i am not a chemist, it appears that "CO"  carbon monoxide has energy of potential that i guess some bacteria can use.

      In another article in TR, compressed air is looked at as an energy source for a vehicle. What is the feasibility of using both the chemical and the mechanical energy in compressed carbon monoxide.
      Naturally we would expect that all the carbon monoxide is converted into carbon dioxide.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      shomas
      01/20/2008
      Posts:42
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • The Cost of Gathering and Handling Biomass
    I tend to doubt the cheap cost of this ethanol. This process resembles synfuel production from biomass. 70% of the cost of that cost-prohibitive process goes to collection, handling and preparation of the biomass. Why would this process not face the same costs?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    MakeSense
    01/20/2008
    Posts:93
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • There's something missing here...
    "It is theoretically possible to feed our organism exclusively carbon monoxide and it will make ethanol from that,"

    Not without a bunch of hydrogen, it isn't!

    Ethanol, C2H5OH, has three times as many atoms of hydrogen as it does of carbon, and six times as much hydrogen as oxygen. So I don't know how one could possibly make it "exclusively" from carbon monoxide.

    Maybe that was taken out of context. But statements like this blow my suspension of disbelief out of the water.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Bytesmiths
    01/27/2008
    Posts:4
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • Re: Something Missing Hear
    Not without a bunch of hydrogen, it isn't!

    Ethanol, C2H5OH, has three times as many atoms of hydrogen as it does of carbon, and six times as much hydrogen as oxygen. So I don't know how one could possibly make it "exclusively" from carbon monoxide.


    It is completely true C2H5OH can not be made from strictly CO. I don't think the author considered water part of the organisms feed stock which it is. Chemist out there, please forgive my notations but wouldn't it take 2(CO) and 3(H2O) to make 1(C2H5OH) and 3(O2) oxygen molecule.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    shomas
    08/02/2008
    Posts:42
    Avg Rating:
    4/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Laser-Triggered Chemical Reactions
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.