Business

Google's Cloud Looms Large

(Page 2 of 2)

  • Monday, December 3, 2007
  • By Kate Greene

A unified theory of cloud computing isn't as simple as writing software, however. There are a number of social and legal issues that need to be dealt with. Most glaringly is user privacy, says Jimmy Lin, professor of computer science at the University of Maryland. This will become especially important if Google serves ads that correspond to all personal information, as it does in Gmail. Depending on the information used to target the ads, it can make some people uncomfortable. "Different people feel differently about the creepiness factor," says Lin. "My sense is that people are still rather uncomfortable about this." In addition, Google's encryption mechanisms aren't flawless. There have been tales of people logging into Gmail and pulling up someone else's account, he says. "Assurances aren't enough to relieve people's fears. All it would take is one incident to throw this all amok."

Moreover, there are copyright ramifications to cloud computing. One of the advantages to storing data in the cloud is that it can be easily shared with other people, but sharing files such as copyrighted music and movies is generally illegal. And in some cases, says Lin, it's unclear if simply storing information on the cloud violates copyright. For instance, the license restrictions on the data he uses for research makes it illegal to copy it onto computers outside of Maryland. "Here's a case where the legal policy really falls behind," he says. "It'll all have to be rewritten."

There's also the conspicuous issue of constant connectivity: a repository of online data isn't useful if there's no Internet connection to be had, or if the signal is spotty. Google's Schillace says that the Internet is becoming more accessible all the time, but the company is aware of today's technical challenge of providing service to Web applications without interruption. "That's certainly a problem," he says, "but there are a number of ways of addressing it." He says that Google offers downloadable software called Gears that acts as a cache for data when a person is using a Web application offline. When the person regains Internet access, Gears automatically syncs with the online application and saves the work on a server. Schillace's team is working to integrate this sort of feature into Google Docs. Moreover, on Friday, the company confirmed its plans to bid on the 700-megahertz wireless spectrum that will be auctioned off by the Federal Communications Commission in January, potentially providing another avenue allowing people to wirelessly connect.

Microsoft is watching Google's moves closely, and the company has its own approach that it thinks can sidestep some of the cloud-computing challenges. "It's not an online world only," says Brian Hall, the general manager of the Windows Live business group. "It's always going to be a combination of [online and offline], and the solution that wins is going to be the one that does the best job with both." Microsoft, he says, is building software that can let people keep some of their files on hard drives, and maintain that privacy, while still letting them access those files remotely. Hall adds that the amount of storage won't be as important as the user experience. "It's not, in the end, going to be a gigabyte-to-gigabyte competition," he says. "That isn't where the hearts and minds of customers will be won."

Still, there's a sense that Google's version of cloud computing has the appeal of simplicity, in spite of the current challenges. Schillace says that by moving applications and data to the Internet, Google is helping make the computer disappear. "I think every generation of application sort of peels away another layer of the computer," he says. Initially, people interacted with computers using command lines, Schillace explains, then used a graphical interface; now people can do much of their work in a Web browser, which can be on a personal computer or a small handheld device. "It's about letting the computer get out of our way so we can work with other people and share our information."

Print

Related Articles

Why Didn't Apple Launch a Music Streaming Service?

Data-hungry apps are colliding with limited data plans.

Moving Security to the Cloud

Combining scanning approaches could keep PCs safe from viruses.

Cloud Computing's Perfect Storm?

An Intel, Yahoo, and HP initiative will use large-scale research projects to test a new Internet-based computing infrastructure.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Gaetano Marano

246 Comments

  • 1533 Days Ago
  • 12/03/2007

>>> then, it seems that ORACLE was RIGHT with its N|C >>>

.

to-day's evolution towards web applicatons/storage and "cloud computing" seems say us that ORACLE was RIGHT with its N|C (Network Computer) idea...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_computer

...but proposed too early, when great part of the internet connections was too slow to support any "cloud computing"

however, the web/cloud computing doesn't add any safety nor any money saving in business and/or professional use, since (both) connection and storage can't assure a 100% privacy of personal and/or classified documents

so, that kind of files will ALWAYS need a PC and local storage for software and documents, and, since they are/will be the MOST important and valuable files, every HDD crash (without recent backup) will ALWAYS be a TRAGEDY

about Google... it clearly is the current leader in web applications and services, but everything it does STILL is FRAGILE, since, big companies like Microsoft, eBay, Apple, IBM, Yahoo, etc., could change this scenario with new investments, new ideas, better services, big agreements, companies and services' fusions, etc.

not to forget the SMALL companies and/or SINGLE peoples, that (despite their small funds) could develop WINNING IDEAS that big companies cant't

you can find a little (personal) example of that (about the """Google""" Lunar X Prize) in this article:

http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/008moonprize.html

.

Reply

walt

66 Comments

  • 1533 Days Ago
  • 12/03/2007

mobile

Watch for g to contract the manufacture of its own phone and then buy an existing mobile network.

Reply

chrisjmiller

63 Comments

  • 1533 Days Ago
  • 12/03/2007

Is this news?

Many organizations already provide for employees to connect to central data repositories either by VPN or using thin client technology.  There's no reason for them to keep any significant data on their laptops/PDAs.

This may be of interest to some consumers (although it will be a very cold day in the infernal regions when I upload all *my* personal data onto the servers of some faceless megacorp), and it's great for Google employees, but can you see <insert corporation name> keeping all their corporate data on some Google cloud?

Reply

weee

35 Comments

  • 1531 Days Ago
  • 12/05/2007

Combined with Flash Based Hard Drives

and more compact/longer lasting batteries mobile computing is set to become lighter and more compact.
I like the idea of taking my notebook out and being able to use it for a whole day without worrying about spare batteries or power leads.
The cloud looks good to me!

Reply

blaster151

1 Comment

  • 1531 Days Ago
  • 12/05/2007

XDrive is Awful

I've been trying to get their customer service for SIX WEEKS to help me download a single file.  Apparently there's a filesize limitation.  I have an 800MB file filled with irreplaceable family pictures.  Now that I need the backup, I can't retrieve it - it simply won't download successfully.  Their customer service people keep passing me around and I can't get the help I need, even though I'm paying by the month.

Reply

mwesterh

1 Comment

  • 1503 Days Ago
  • 01/02/2008

Government Sector

Accessing documents remotely from a DOD site whether it's through email, google, or a home computer is prohibited. With that said, GOOGLE services will not overtake the PC within the government sector.

Reply

mlaan

1 Comment

  • 1399 Days Ago
  • 04/15/2008

data more valuable then money?

It surprises me that everyone is so afraid of letting a large company take care of its vital data, when they apparently have no problem at all to let a bank, which is a large company, keep the money of the company, which in my opinion is a far more vital asset. Is data more valuable than monetary capital?

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Consumer-Driven Disruptions

More

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Geron

Akamai

eSolar

Amazon.com

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement