Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Wikipedians Promise New Search Engine

Continued from page 1

By Wade Roush

Friday, March 16, 2007

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

"We have a lot of things developing in parallel, and some of our projects are actually competing with each other, so we'll have to see what the outcome is," says Penchina. That will take patience, but Wikia is in no hurry to finalize a solution, he says. "We have this saying internally: 'No a priori thinking.' Communities evolve in their own special way, and anyone who thinks they know where the crowd is going to go generally doesn't understand crowd psychology."

Only a few matters are settled, according to Penchina. One is the basic premise: that Wikia Search will combine the strengths of software and people. "Computers are useful for large-scale problem solving like building an index, but machine judgment is usually never as good as human judgment, so you need a blend of the two," he says.

Another settled matter is that Wikia Search's developers won't attempt to reinvent the wheel: the purely algorithmic components of Wikia Search will be built on top of the existing open-source search engines Nutch and Lucene, both initiated by independent software developer Doug Cutting.

Reaction to the news of Wikia's ambitions is mixed. Some in the technical community say that Internet users deserve a search engine whose workings are open for all to examine, in contrast to the closely guarded ranking algorithms used by Google and its peers.

Others have underscored the huge challenges in going up against the likes of Google, which employs many of the world's best brains in information-retrieval technology, owns a vast global infrastructure of servers, and dishes up results good enough that more than one in four Internet users make a stop at the search engine every day. "Google and Yahoo and MSN and Ask do a pretty damned good job," remarked search-industry veteran Stavros Macrakis in a late February post to the Wikia Search mailing list. "It's not as though the competition was a $2,000 Encyclopaedia Britannica which is always years out of date."

Penchina acknowledges the scale of the challenges but says Wikia is in the search business for the long haul. "I don't know that we expect massively impressive results from day one," he says. "Wikipedia has taken six years to get where it is."

Wikia Search has a somewhat confusing genealogy. Wikipedia, which melded the idea of an online encyclopedia with the collaborative-editing technology of wikis, has been controlled since 2003 by the nonprofit Wikimedia Foundation, which also operates Wiktionary, Wikinews, Wikiquote, and other collaborative projects.

Wikia, on the other hand, is a for-profit company cofounded in 2004 by Wales and British Internet entrepreneur Angela Beeseley under the original name Wikicities. It hosts hundreds of special-interest wikis, including wikis for genealogy buffs. Wikia has no direct connection to Wikipedia; however, several of Wikipedia's most dedicated contributors are now employees at Wikia, including Beeseley.

Wikia raised at least $4 million in venture capital in 2006 from a group including Bessemer Venture Partners, Omidyar Network, Amazon.com, and angel investors.

Comments

  • Wiki Limitations
    Seems like the Wiki model for development has some serious problems.  Some time ago I tried contributing to Wikipedia by helping with some editing chores.  I couldn't even set up an account because they had blocked common IP addresses used by Verizon DSL.  Further, there is no way of contacting anyone until one sets up an account.

    Though collaborative efforts seem like a great idea, if there are not people willing to serve the roll of "customer support" they can end up falling far short of their potential.  At least with commercial enterprises, someone must be accountable and discipline is imposed by market economics.  From things I have read online it seems like Wikipedia is a free-for-all of banning and blocking wars by editors.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    rhapsodyingl...
    03/20/2007
    Posts:59
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: Wiki Limitations
      Read on:
      The artical says that this is a Business model NOT a non-profit model. BIG difference.

      Plus you have the venture capitalist in there AND
      Amazon to boot. So my guess is that they will make it work along wth what a profitable venture should be. 

      Personally I am all for a new type of search engine and one that makes since.

      I get tired of writing in a few words about one particular subject matter and end up getting a few hundred answers back with a majority of them having no direct meaning to what I am looking for.

      I think some one can do better and I hope they are the ones to do it. And as for Encyclpedias, Amazon knows all about those too - so my guess is this venture is going to turn out to be a good one. I'd bet my money on it. They have money - management - experiance - and a need. Sounds promising to me.

      Also in regards to the problem you stated for your self with setting up an account, I hope they read your comment and fix it. Peace!


      P
      Rate this comment: 12345

      JoshuaJDP
      03/30/2007
      Posts:3

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

The Marcellus Shale Gas Rush
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.