Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement
« Back 1 [2]

Wednesday, December 13, 2006

Carbon Dioxide Finds a Market in the North Sea

Continued from page 1

By Peter Fairley

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Sargas seeks instead to make the capture of carbon dioxide more efficient by cranking up the pressure. Its plants would burn gas or coal at high pressures, thus yielding a high-pressure exhaust in which the CO2 pressure is about 20 times higher than in a conventional coal plant. That pressure makes separating the CO2 from nitrogen and left-over oxygen in the exhaust far less costly.

Last week a consortium of companies in Norway including aluminum giant Alcan (a major power consumer) and Norwegian energy firm Norsk Hydro announced plans to build a 400-megawatt coal-fired power plant using Sargas' design; startup is targeted for 2011. Dale Simbeck, vice president of technology for Mountain View, CA-based energy consultancy SFA Pacific, calls it a "clever scheme" because coal is relatively cheap, while the high pressure system will help contain the cost of capturing the CO2. "What they're doing can make sense," says Simbeck.

Tor Christensen of Sargas says the company is working with a major United States-based oil and gas producer to exploit another feature of high-pressure combustion: the system's compact design. For a given power output Sargas' generators handle a volume of gas 40-50 times smaller than would a conventional plant. As a result the equipment is more compact—compact enough to put a 100-megawatt natural gas-fired plant on an offshore platform. "It's not much for an offshore platform," says Christensen of the 5,000 metric ton design. "A single crane can lift the whole thing."

McRae says the idea should be attractive for oil and gas producers. For one thing, Sargas' plants will capture CO2 on-site, eliminating the need to ship CO2 from shore. For another, they will serve the platform's power needs better than the diesel generators and relatively small gas turbines used today. "One of the big problems with offshore oil platforms is the power supply that you need to pump the oil and process the gas that comes out the ground. Sargas will allow you to get much larger power in a smaller space," says McRae.

Christensen says Sargas' goal is to deliver CO2 to oil platforms at roughly $20 per metric ton and, as a rule of thumb, each metric ton of CO2 should yield two or three extra barrels of oil. If oil prices stay high, says Christensen, "there's a tremendous amount of money to be made."

« Back 1 [2]

Resources

Events

Comments

  • How muc could be stocked this way?
    normanicus on 12/13/2006 at 8:35 AM
    Posts:
    1
    So, if this works just how many holes are there to put CO2 into and how much would they hold? Are there any downsides to burying CO2 this way?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: How muc could be stocked this way?
      edsonbila on 12/13/2006 at 1:17 PM
      Posts:
      7
      If the gas escapes to the surface (I mean, it can be close enought to the land or ships) it will kill everything that is not a plant arount it. And CO2 has no smell.
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: How muc could be stocked this way?
      kitk on 12/14/2006 at 12:11 AM
      Posts:
      53
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      CO2, and water, among other things, have been injected into oil wells for generations. Only a leak or blow out at the well-head could deliver enough gas to be harmfull, as deep wells distribute the gas over large areas underground. There are many natural gas seeps in the world, most quite innocuous, except where heavy gas can accumulate--such as some volcanic fields. In the sea, or under the North Sea, no CO2 could rise to the surface as the sea water would absorb it on the way, as it does CO2 from the decay of organic debris. This water-bourne CO2 then is absorbed into plants, or minerals, creating carbonates. So, well injection is a very safe bet, and has been proven for many decades.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • flu gas--is it sick?
    ms on 12/13/2006 at 8:57 PM
    Posts:
    72
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    Perhaps you meant flue gas.
    Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review November/December 2008
Sun + Water = Fuel
An MIT chemist has opened the way to making hydrogen fuel from water using sunlight.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology