Business

Making Electrical Grids More Efficient

(Page 2 of 2)

  • Thursday, August 10, 2006
  • By Peter Fairley

Gas-fired frequency regulation is also increasingly expensive, due to the increasing cost of natural gas. Dan Mears, president of the San Diego-based energy consultancy Technology Insights, says high-cost gas hits the ISOs twice. In addition to boosting the cost of gas-fired frequency regulation, high gas prices are accelerating the installation of wind turbines, whose gusty, choppy power output may increase the need for frequency regulation. "It's a problem feeding on itself," says Mears.

Beacon Power's flywheel storage systems are programmed to zero out frequency fluctuations by recycling energy: an electric motor uses excess grid power to accelerate magnetically levitated carbon and fiberglass flywheels to as high as 22,500 rpm, then discharge that stored kinetic energy by regenerating the electricity when the grid frequency dips. Unlike batteries -- the leading competitor in energy storage -- Beacon's flywheels can withstand continuous deep cycling without losing capacity.

The most recent test of its technology, a four-month trial begun last week at Pacific Gas and Electric's San Ramon research center, employs seven 6-kilowatt-hour flywheels, each the size of a small refrigerator, ganged together to form a system that can absorb or discharge 100 kilowatts of power for 15 minutes. For commercial systems, Beacon Power is building 25-kilowatt flywheels the size of tall refrigerators, which would be combined in clusters to deliver 1 to 20 megawatts.

The flywheels' rapid response should also make every megawatt go further than the equivalent output from a gas-fired power plant, say officials at the California Energy Commission in Sacramento, which is cofunding the California demonstration with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Mike Gravely, the California Energy Commission project manager tending the San Ramon tests, says gas-fired generators can take five minutes or more to respond to California ISO's frequency control signals (issued every four seconds). By then, the system has often moved back toward equilibrium on its own. In contrast, Beacon's flywheels are capable of switching from full power absorb to full power discharge faster than Cal-ISO can send its commands. "There's a possibility that if you can respond to the needs faster, you may not need as much energy -- you can do more with less," says Gravely.

Gyuk at the DOE predicts that just 100 megawatts of flywheel reserve -- half of what California buys from conventional generators today -- could handle 90 percent of the state's frequency problems. And, if the costs come in as Beacon Power predicts, the resulting savings could be substantial. Lazarewicz says a one-megawatt plant will cost about $1.5 million to build and can expect to earn about $400,000 per year from the ISOs for its services. As a result, Lazarewicz says the plant should pay for itself in four years, even after covering the cost of the power lost in running the systems (about 15 percent of the total energy handled).

Mears says the flywheel's quick response could also have a welcome side-benefit: improving the grid's reliability. Flywheel plants could free up gas-fired plants to provide extra peaking power on sweltering summer days when air conditioners are at full blast and interstate power lines are full. What's more, the flywheel's quick response could keep a tighter hold on the grid's frequency, squelching power deviations that start small but, when the system is overstressed, can initiate a cascading failure. "Keeping the grid stable is the whole idea behind frequency regulation," agrees Lazarewicz. "This is simply a way that we can do that better, and cheaper."

Print

Related Articles

Fixing the Power Grid

Big batteries will fight blackouts and could make renewable power economically viable.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Guest (Espen)

  • 2014 Days Ago
  • 08/10/2006

Why generate and pollute?

Why not reduce excess consumption to obtain the same end ressult, avoiding 15% loss plus obtaining savings in usage at the same time? Generating at the margin or "wasting" to spinn a flywheel just in case, is at best a temporary solution. "Dynamic Flexible demand response" must be the real way forward!

Reply

Guest (Count Zero)

  • 2014 Days Ago
  • 08/10/2006

Because...

... you are probably no better than any of those out there sitting in front of their desktop PCs, laptops, 2 or 3 mobile phones, PDAs, plasma TV sets, wardrobe-sized refrigerators and 1 SUV/family member and keep buying power-hungry gizmos, but are the first to raise their voice when it comes to environmental issues without taking one single second to think about it. Who knows, maybe they are part of the cause... Backup power will always be necessary and at least flywheels are efficient and do not represent environmental hazards. As for your "Dynamic Flexible Demand Response", I think it crossed the minds of many people smarter than you. Now the problem is: how do you want to implement that without a system that responds in due time?

Reply

Guest (Espen)

  • 2008 Days Ago
  • 08/16/2006

Response system

We have the system, the patents and already we have signed up a lot of people smarter than me (technically). What is your virtue and knowhow regarding the functioning of a balanced electricity grid?

Reply

Guest (Sir Lanse)

  • 2014 Days Ago
  • 08/10/2006

zero sum game

No matter how much 'WE' conserve, there will always be room to conserve more.  Until we all consume zero energy, and that is not going to happen.  So your post is nonsense.
I was told about the airforce using this type of system for computer UPS decades ago.  They liked it, because nobody could read the power usage and tell what the computers were doing.  According to my friend, they did a great job of power conditioning and stopped lighting strikes from getting into the system. No direct wire.

Reply

Guest (guest)

  • 2014 Days Ago
  • 08/10/2006

It's not about consumption, but frequency

The whole point is to regulate frequency variations due to unavoidable, unpredictable variations in usage. Cutting overall consumption is a good idea, but unless you can predict, to the second, when a surge in demand will take place, you can't cut consumption to match.

Reply

Guest (Espen)

  • 2008 Days Ago
  • 08/16/2006

frequency regulation 2 sec response

Our patented system, being tested live at the moment in one grid area, responds in under 2 seconds and reach 99,8% of the units to cut as oposed to feed in more power to avoid frequency fluctuations. In addition most of the marginal production polutes and cost more than average. By reducing power consumption, reinforcing the grid can be postponed and transformerstations can be better utilized.
A flywheel "wastes" by using more than it delivers (and the energy going into production of a large enough number of units to make an impact is also counterproductive.

Reply

Notnerb

1 Comment

  • 1966 Days Ago
  • 09/27/2006

Re: frequency regulation 2 sec response

Yeah good one. And how does reducing consumption help with frequency overruns? Unless you can magically reinject that demand in under 2 seconds when the frequency goes too HIGH, you are just blowing hot air.  A flywheel and capacitor arrangement can address high and low frequency situations in the one unit, with minimal energy wastage.
I suspect you know virtually nothing about large-scale power systems.  Do you even know what reactive power is?

Reply

Advertisement

Guest (Mark Shapiro)

  • 2014 Days Ago
  • 08/10/2006

Flywheel "smoothing" is good, and so are

all conservation and efficiency measures.  Technology is improving across the board, and removing subsidies helps us implement them.

Reply

Guest (Capacitor)

  • 2014 Days Ago
  • 08/10/2006

Just a big Capacitor

It is about time they created this.  In an electronic circuit, you have capacitors and coils to smoothout the voltage and amperage.  But in the electrical distribution system, they don't have it.  I guess it would take a giant capicator to do the job and there is no such thing as a giant capacitor.  So this flywheel storage device should help alot to smoothout the circuit call the distribution line.

Reply

rpf

1 Comment

  • 1999 Days Ago
  • 08/25/2006

Re: Just a big Capacitor-Not Really

The flywheel represent a rotating mass that provides both real power and reactive power that within limits of the equipment rating can provide support to the grid during a transient condition

Reply

Guest (Mike)

  • 2009 Days Ago
  • 08/15/2006

Residential Unit

Do they make a residentila sized unit? If yes - where is it available and how much does it cost?

Reply

Guest (Ron)

  • 2009 Days Ago
  • 08/15/2006

Why frequency varies

ON a power grid with many generators, often at different locations, the AC generators must be kept in sync.  Heavy transient loads will slow down the nearest generator as it works harder to supply the demand.  If it slows to 59Hz while others are still at 60Hz then the line voltage is no longer a sine wave.  Generators can't change speed very fast because they are big and heavy so an oscillation can start where each one is playing catch up to the others.  Local flywheels could supply this transient energy before it slows the generator and everything stays stable. 

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Consumer-Driven Disruptions

More

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

BIND Biosciences

BrightSource Energy

Groupon

Synthetic Genomics

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement