Business

When Copy Protection Becomes Malware

Computer security guru Bruce Schneier says media companies won't ease up on invasive technology until consumers balk.

  • Tuesday, May 16, 2006
  • By Wade Roush

Cryptographer Bruce Schneier is chief technical officer at Counterpane Internet Security in Mountain View, CA, and a frequent critic of how companies implement computer security technologies. He publishes a widely read monthly security newsletter, Crypto-Gram, and is the author of Beyond Fear: Thinking Sensibly About Security in an Uncertain World. Schneier has been particularly outspoken in public statements and editorials about Sony BMG's botched attempt last year to limit copying of its music CDs; the company used a tool called a "rootkit" to hide copy-protection software on people's computers, inadvertently opening up those computers to attack by hackers (see "Inside the Spyware Scandal").

Bruce Schneier, chief technical officer, Counterpane Internet Security, Mountain View, CA. (Photo by Steve Woit.)

Technology Review senior editor Wade Roush interviewed Schneier about the Sony episode on March 16.

Advertisement

Technology Review: Last year, Sony BMG released CDs carrying copy protection software called XCP written by U.K. company First4Internet, which hid itself using a rootkit-like technique. Once the rootkit became public knowledge, security experts immediately labeled XCP as malware. Why?

Bruce Schneier: When you take functionality away from the user -- where there is a mechanism by which some third party can bypass what the user wants -- that, inherently, is what malware is. It's a system that does things behind the user's back that the user doesn't want. So almost by definition, these copy protection programs are indistinguishable from malicious code.

TR: Will the Sony rootkit episode lead to consumers viewing digital media in a different way? For example, do you think they'll eventually demand less restrictive types of digital rights management?

BS: I hope so, but it's always dicey trying to guess what consumers will do. In the market for computers and software, consumers usually don't know what they're buying. They don't have a clue. This debacle gave a window into what is going on. But was it enough to make consumers realize that they need to not buy certain products, or that they're being sold substandard goods? The answer is probably not. And that's too bad, because if buyers can't make intelligent buying decisions, the whole structure of capitalism starts to break down.

TR: Okay, let's say you're a consumer and want to buy some digital content, but you don't want to give up control of your computer. What should you do?

BS: Write your congressman. If all consumers can get is what is being sold, and what is being sold has copy protection, consumers can't get what they want. The only way consumers can get what they want is if we as a society either demand it or force it. We could boycott [the media companies], but that's probably not going to happen. The boycotts against Sony BMG didn't last, and the media companies know that.

Print

Related Articles

Spying on Spyware

Analysts say spyware writers are gaining the upper hand over computer security experts.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Guest (vso@peervision.com)

  • 2100 Days Ago
  • 05/16/2006

The meaning of “owning” is blurred

Content owners have every right to protect their interests and consumers protect their rights.  This creates conflicts in the digital world because the meaning of “owning” is blurred.   Should we change to rent instead of buy?

Reply

Guest

  • 2100 Days Ago
  • 05/16/2006

Wouldn't that be called "pay to play", or "pay per view"?

People are already balking, that's why they're not buying.  Punishing them with malware isn't going to make anyone's sales increase.  Make it easy and safe to get content over the net. Yes, you'll lose some profit to thieves, but most people are honest and want to do the right thing. 

See napster, itunes, etc. for examples.  Why shouldn't HBO, ABC, Disney, SONY, WB, etc offer similar options?

Reply

Guest (Don)

  • 2100 Days Ago
  • 05/16/2006

Content/software "ownership"

Read the fine print associated with what you "buy"... Entertainment content has much in common with software -- you usually buy (license) the right to use a copy, not the content or software itself. The meaning of "owning" is indeed blurred by semantics here, and the entertainment industry seems to still be grappling with how to "license" its wares for public use.

Reply

Guest (Joe Moore)

  • 2099 Days Ago
  • 05/17/2006

The meaning of "owning" is blurred but...

I own my computer and nobody is claiming that I rent it. When some company secretly installs software that hides files from me on the computer that I own, someone from that company should go to jail for violating the same laws that computer virus and worm  spreaders violate.

Reply

Guest (Richard Tedrow)

  • 2100 Days Ago
  • 05/16/2006

"Write your Congressman"

...lame as it sounds in the world of $6 bill a year lobbying in DC, is still best.  Be polite and brief but forceful: 

"I have a very strong interest in __________ and it's a deal breaker for me.  You vote for my interests, I vote for you.  Or not.  Thank you, etc."

Lobbying money means nothing if your guy isn't re-elected.

Reply

Guest (Chris)

  • 2100 Days Ago
  • 05/16/2006

Test

This is a test

Reply

Guest (Martin)

  • 2100 Days Ago
  • 05/16/2006

DRM

DRM is being used to prevent dubbing old videos to DVDs, a right one has to make a backup copy is infringed thereby.  As VCRs are going away, there ought to be a way to override the copy protection.  Any ideas?

Reply

Advertisement

Guest (movielover)

  • 1779 Days Ago
  • 04/02/2007

Re: DRM

I wish I knew. I just ran up against the new HBO copy protection.In the past, I downloaded movies with TIVO, then made one dvd copy for my collection. This is something that viewers have been doing since the VCR was invented. Now HBO prohibits more than one copy...and the TIVO recorder has the one copy. Thus, a dvd cannot be made. This is crap. I complained to TIVO, SONY (my recorder) and HBO. I guess I need to write my congressman, too.

Reply

Guest (Chris)

  • 2100 Days Ago
  • 05/16/2006

Another Test

this is another test

Reply

Guest (Martin)

  • 2100 Days Ago
  • 05/16/2006

Re: Test

I seem to be unable to post.

Reply

Guest (ms)

  • 2100 Days Ago
  • 05/16/2006

copy protection run amuk

A few years ago, I bought a Sony portable digital recorder to record my children's musical performances. When I tried to copy the recordings digitally, the device's copy protection software wouldn't let me do it. Sony's response to my complaint was, roughly, "tough". I vowed then never to buy another Sony product (and I haven't).

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Consumer-Driven Disruptions

More

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Netflix

eSolar

Joule Unlimited

Applied Materials

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement