Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

The End of NASA Science

Continued from page 1

By Kate Greene

Thursday, March 16, 2006

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

The proposed $16.8 billion for NASA in 2007 showed no net losses (accounting for inflation) with a 3.2 percent increase over 2006. But during the next four years, approximately $3 billion from planetary exploration and basic science will go toward the 17 remaining shuttle missions -– mostly to complete the space station -- before the fleet is grounded in 2010.

NASA's priorities are off kilter, says Robert Park, a physicist at the University of Maryland. The manned missions have not been nearly as successful as the science missions, and money will be cut from the NASA projects that have been most beneficial, says Park. While the ISS and Space Shuttle have produced few scientific or technological gems, he notes, NASA's science missions have given rise to useful technology, including satellites for climate, global positioning, and communication. "The pity," says Park, "is [NASA science is] what's really been working."

The agency's space science may suffer the most from a thousand little cuts to small programs, data analysis, and basic research, says Michael Brown, professor of planetary astronomy at the California Institute of Technology. "The fact that they're cutting the research budget means that I'm not going to be able to fund students," he says.

These students, many of whom use NASA data to write PhD theses, pour over mountains of numbers to make sense of all of the information collected by roughly 50 spacecraft dispersed throughout the solar system. "We're out there flying around Saturn, collected data at some incredible rate," Brown says, "and most of it goes and sits in an archive."

Without funding for students and post-doctoral researchers, he says, the unprocessed data that has been collected in past and current missions will not be analyzed for decades. Cuts to research funding will hit the science community especially hard, Brown adds, when data starts pouring back from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, a spacecraft that entered Mars' orbit last week and is designed to send back 10 times more information than all other space missions combined.

Scientists say these NASA cuts will affect the development of future research missions and the analysis of data collected from past, current, and future probes, rovers, and satellites. Small research projects, in particular, help to train scientists who join the technology sector and work on non-space-related research and development, scientists say.

Many scientists whose research is funded by the agency are clearly disheartened. "The morale of scientists at NASA has never been anything like this low," says Park. Moreover, Friedman of The Planetary Society predicts that over the next few years, while research results will dribble in, many scientists will move to other fields.

Comments

  • Wastefull spending
    We are spending more than that in just two to three months in Iraq.  I think our priorities are quite mixed up.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (TN)
    03/16/2006
    Posts:1
  • The first A in NASA's name
    Thanks for the article "The End of NASA Science." I agree completely, but I note this unfortunate fact too: the article nearly completely shares the national media's near-blindness to NASA's enormous array of aeronautical research capabilities, which are also being devastated by the "Vision for Space Exploration." We have a semi-dystopia in air travel now, but we also have imaginative, able aeronautical research engineers in NASA. Yet we refer to our National AERONAUTICS and Space Administration as merely the "space agency" rather than as what it actually is, or I guess now I should say, was: the aerospace agency. Will travel change as much in this century as in the last? If so, will this country's aeronautical research establishment contribute? For the second question, the signs aren't good. Thanks.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Steven T. Corneliussen)
    03/16/2006
    Posts:1
    • Barbarians at the helm
      This current government is truly a government of barbarians. They know nothing, and understand nothing, and listen to no-one ecept their own ideological cohorts. From Iraq, to global warming, to Katrina, to basic science to a grossly appalling military budget to you name it, they have f***ed things up in a big way. It will take years to fix their mistakes and the public and the media just slumbers on
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (srinivas)
      03/16/2006
      Posts:1
    • erik.a.zahn@boeing.com
      I completely agree.  It's gotten very bad with NASA in respect to Aeronautics.  I have come to the firm belief that NASA needs to be broken up back into NACA and NSC.  At least then they wouldn't be able to cannibalize the budget so easily and it would show that the "emperor has no clothes" with respect to aeronautics in the US.  Maybe it's time to move to Europe, they seem to care quite a bit about Aeronautics. 
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Erik)
      03/17/2006
      Posts:1
  • It is so short sighted...
    This is not the first time that budgets for research missions have had to be cut.  There is nothing to be gained at this time from sending a manned misson to Mars, except of course to stand barrel chested and say "We've put a man on Mars!" And?

    We still don't know why there has been such a high failure rate on other missions to Mars.

    The question that needs to be answered is... "Who stands to gain the most from sending men to Mars?"

    The answer... "Commercial ventures and big business"

    Conclusion... "Motivate those who stand to gain the most to 'invest' in manned missions.

    The same people would also gain from investing in research to beef up those coffers as well.

    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Daniel R. Franco)
    03/17/2006
    Posts:1
  • Christian Talibans
    This administration behaves like the Talibans. A bunch of religious fundamentalists imposing their primitive, medieval values. They put that guy without a college degree as the NASA PR Chief. He went around removing the word "evolution" in all NASA publications, and he also tried to muzzle NASA scientists speaking out about global warming. Can you imagine a college drop out telling world experts what to say publicly about their own science? This administration is insane.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Gabe)
    03/17/2006
    Posts:1

Resources

Events

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Laser-Triggered Chemical Reactions
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.