Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Wearable Health Reports

Continued from page 1

By Katherine Bourzac

Tuesday, February 28, 2006

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

The sensors were built using existing technologies -- it's the algorithms in the hub that make the system unique, says Freund. For example, hydration is assessed by measuring how much water escapes from the bladder-style canteen. Based on an analysis of drinking patterns, the hub can tell the difference between a soldier's sips and slow, steady water loss to a leak. The hub will send out a "grey" signal if there is no heart rate or respiration for five minutes, but it knows when this occurs because the soldier has taken off his sensors, and will send a "blue" signal instead, for "unknown." Along with a health status report, the hub sends out a confidence rating -- "You know when you don't know," as Freund puts it -- so that medical resources won't be misdirected.

Currently, the hub sends and receives information using radio frequencies, but this could change, since its architecture is open-ended. Using internal radios, it currently works at short range up to 100 meters; for long-range uses, it connects to commercial or field radios. Data from the system have also been sent through a cell-phone text-messaging system for long distances in real time.

Michael Cima, MIT professor of materials science and engineering who works on medical devices and is associated with MIT's Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies, is "very impressed" with the monitoring system. Because the system is modular, he says, it could easily be adapted for other uses in health care. Cima says he believes the Army research will lead to medical technologies for monitoring patients after they've left the hospital.

Actual deployment of the monitoring system will happen piecemeal. Buller says the sleep-monitoring watches are already being field-tested on pilots in Iraq. These devices use accelerometers to collect information about body movement -- information that can be analyzed to determine whether the wearer is awake or asleep. Every branch of the armed services won't want or need all the information the sensors are capable of generating. But the Army is collaborating with NASA, the Navy, and the Air Force, who are interested in using the system to create flight suits that respond to changes in G-force.

Home page image courtesy of the U.S. Army.

 

Comments

  • Trackability
    So if the enemy can find out what frequency this stuff runs on, can they get a beep when soldiers are approaching?  Could they get some directional info too?
    Can it tell how many times the soldier whacked off before going to sleep?  The answers to these questions may show how much the soldiers would want to wear this gear.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (SirLanse)
    02/28/2006
    Posts:1
    • Garbage in garbage out
      This gear is GIGO...if you look at the soldiers today, they already have to carry an inordinate amount of gear. Now these armchair scientists want to load them up even further, with mostly useless stuff...when you're in life threatening combat, bullets and mortars flying around, your priority is not whether your body is optimally hydrated or not, or whether you had enough calories for the day, or whether you can have a good night's sleep ('cause you won't)...Any sane soldier will dump such useless gear. The only hope of making it work is to make it superlightweight, and build it into the uniform.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (doesn't matter)
      02/28/2006
      Posts:1
      • system is too heavy
        The article says this gear weighs about 700 grams (close to 3 pounds)...that is way too heavy to carry around as extra weight, in a combat situation. I'd rather have extra ammo with me for that amount of weight.
        Rate this comment: 12345
        Guest (doesn't matter)
        03/01/2006
        Posts:1
        • check your math
          700 grams isn't even 2 pounds. You'd get as much deadweight from carrying around a 2/3-full canteen of water, or one 30-round magazine and a few loose rounds. Heck, IIRC swapping your M16A3 for an AK-47 would weigh you down more than wearing this thing.
          Rate this comment: 12345
          Guest (doesn't it?)
          04/24/2006
          Posts:1
    • Puaj!
      Firsteable it only shows that US is preparing for war, which means that something else is close. And about this gadget I suppose that it will be used only for personnel at top because insignificants soldiers are sent to war prepared to die and to kill. BUT the main thing I noticed that will fail during a fight is... it's Microsoft based product! Haha!! I can read the blue crash screen on it: This device has found a problem and has to turn off, soldier can get lost and die.
      Press any key
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Daniel Velázquez)
      02/28/2006
      Posts:1
  • I'm doing a report on this topic...
    Hey,
    My name is Jennifer Rogers and
    I am doing a report on this topic. A lot of my friends are in the army and national guard so
    I thought it would be quite interesting to do my report on this. I would like to know if you have any information or anything that would help me with this project. If you have a anything.. please contact me at jenniferleann_14@hotmail.com. Thank you so much for your help!
                           Sincerely,
                       Jennifer Rogers
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Jennifer Rogers)
    02/28/2006
    Posts:1
    • WPSM
      Who are you doing the report for?  A publication or just for your friends?  abehar@vivometrics.com
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Andrew Behar)
      04/21/2006
      Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Laser-Triggered Chemical Reactions
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.