Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Wearable Health Reports

The U.S. Army is testing medical sensors that can monitor everything from sleep patterns to whether a soldier is injured.

By Katherine Bourzac

Tuesday, February 28, 2006

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

This May, the U.S. Army will conduct the first large-scale field test of a wearable health-status monitoring system for its soldiers. The technology, developed in a three-year, $9 million project that began in 2003, consists of sensors that collect data such as heart rate, and beam them to a processor worn on the body, which then analyzes the data and sends a simple health status rating to a medic's PDA.

[Click here to view images.]

Colonel Beau Freund, manager of the program, says the wearable sensors will "provide the medic with vital signs and location [of hurt soldiers] so he can decide who he goes to in what order." But Freund emphasizes that "preventing injury is just as important." For instance, the system monitors hydration and how much sleep a soldier has had. Measuring restfulness is "the first attempt to get at cognitive health -- is the war-fighter capable of good decisions?" says Freund. A commander could then look at this information and send the freshest group of soldiers into combat.

A medic or commander can also view the information on a battlefield map that shows the location of each soldier and his or her health status: green (okay), yellow (look), red (look now), blue (unknown), or grey (absence of life signs for over five minutes). Or he could zero in on individual soldiers and get information about their vital signs, position, and how much they've slept or had to drink. Freund says that the system does not overwhelm medics with large amounts of data, yet gives them enough information to triage hurt soldiers. The system currently works with a Microsoft PDA designed for viewing medical records.

Freund and his team were faced with creating a light-weight monitoring system that would run without supplementary power for 72 hours, that could withstand submersion, and that soldiers could forget they had on or were carrying. Their solution was a series of sensors in a chest belt, watch, canteen, pill, and processing hub that together weigh about 720 grams (click on link above to see these items). Sensors in the chest belt, watch, canteen, and pill collect six categories of data: vital signs and body orientation, hydration, sleep status, body temperature, and whether the soldier has been shot. Mark Buller, a lead engineer on the project, estimates that if the system were manufactured in bulk, the price for a set of sensors and hub would run about $600.

The core of the sensing system is the chest belt, which reads pulse, respiration, skin temperature, body orientation, and ambulation (whether a soldier is still, in a vehicle, or walking). Buller says the belt contains three silver-loaded cloth electrodes that measure heart rate, and a temperature probe. Data from an accelerometer in the belt can be used to determine body position and whether a soldier is still or moving. The belt also senses the expansion of the chest to count breaths. An optional acoustic sensor is designed to pick up vibrations resulting from a ballistic wound, although this device has yet to be tested on the battlefield.

Comments

  • Trackability
    So if the enemy can find out what frequency this stuff runs on, can they get a beep when soldiers are approaching?  Could they get some directional info too?
    Can it tell how many times the soldier whacked off before going to sleep?  The answers to these questions may show how much the soldiers would want to wear this gear.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (SirLanse)
    02/28/2006
    Posts:1
    • Garbage in garbage out
      This gear is GIGO...if you look at the soldiers today, they already have to carry an inordinate amount of gear. Now these armchair scientists want to load them up even further, with mostly useless stuff...when you're in life threatening combat, bullets and mortars flying around, your priority is not whether your body is optimally hydrated or not, or whether you had enough calories for the day, or whether you can have a good night's sleep ('cause you won't)...Any sane soldier will dump such useless gear. The only hope of making it work is to make it superlightweight, and build it into the uniform.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (doesn't matter)
      02/28/2006
      Posts:1
      • system is too heavy
        The article says this gear weighs about 700 grams (close to 3 pounds)...that is way too heavy to carry around as extra weight, in a combat situation. I'd rather have extra ammo with me for that amount of weight.
        Rate this comment: 12345
        Guest (doesn't matter)
        03/01/2006
        Posts:1
        • check your math
          700 grams isn't even 2 pounds. You'd get as much deadweight from carrying around a 2/3-full canteen of water, or one 30-round magazine and a few loose rounds. Heck, IIRC swapping your M16A3 for an AK-47 would weigh you down more than wearing this thing.
          Rate this comment: 12345
          Guest (doesn't it?)
          04/24/2006
          Posts:1
    • Puaj!
      Firsteable it only shows that US is preparing for war, which means that something else is close. And about this gadget I suppose that it will be used only for personnel at top because insignificants soldiers are sent to war prepared to die and to kill. BUT the main thing I noticed that will fail during a fight is... it's Microsoft based product! Haha!! I can read the blue crash screen on it: This device has found a problem and has to turn off, soldier can get lost and die.
      Press any key
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Daniel Velázquez)
      02/28/2006
      Posts:1
  • I'm doing a report on this topic...
    Hey,
    My name is Jennifer Rogers and
    I am doing a report on this topic. A lot of my friends are in the army and national guard so
    I thought it would be quite interesting to do my report on this. I would like to know if you have any information or anything that would help me with this project. If you have a anything.. please contact me at jenniferleann_14@hotmail.com. Thank you so much for your help!
                           Sincerely,
                       Jennifer Rogers
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Jennifer Rogers)
    02/28/2006
    Posts:1
    • WPSM
      Who are you doing the report for?  A publication or just for your friends?  abehar@vivometrics.com
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Andrew Behar)
      04/21/2006
      Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Ultra-Efficient Gas Engine Passes Test
Technology Review March/April 2010

Current Issue

TR50
TR presents the 50 most innovative public and private companies of the year.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.