Benchmarks

Concrete Left Standing

  • July 1999
  • By Rebecca Zacks

Fake earthquakes test safer building methods

   

They're not going to huff and they're not going to puff, but researchers at the University of California at San Diego (UCSD) are wielding 10 huge hydraulic jacks that could easily bring a shoddily constructed house down. The team is using the jacks to subject a 60-percent-scale model of a five-story concrete building to a series of simulated earthquakes; like the third little pig, they believe they've got a better building technique that will keep their structure standing.

The testing is the culmination of a 10-year collaboration between universities, industry and the National Science Foundation to develop seismically sound structures using prefabricated, or "precast," concrete. Builders generally prefer precast to poured-in-place concrete-it's cheaper and faster to erect. What's more, factory fabrication allows for better quality control and frees a project from the whims of the weather. But conventional precast construction is susceptible to damage from earthquakes, and building codes have traditionally frowned upon its use in earthquake-prone areas such as the West Coast.

 

To read the entire article you must log in:

Most of our content — all daily news, blogs, and videos — is free. Magazine stories are paid. To read this story, you must have a subscription or you must use a reading credit. Registration to Technology Review is free and entitles registrants to three free reading credits.

Username or REGISTER
Password  
   
 
Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Meet 2011 TR35 Winner Jesse Robbins

More

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Serious Materials

Crowdcast

IBM

BIND Biosciences

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement