Trends

Exploring the CAVE

  • March 1998
  • By Jane Stevens
   

Late last spring, engineers at Searle, the pharmaceutical subsidiary of Monsanto, discovered a design problem in a factory the company was planning to build. Two pipes on top of a piece of equipment called a fluid bed drier would stand 6.08 meters tall, but the ceiling would be only 6.05 meters high. To figure out whether they needed to raise the ceiling, engineers would normally have to roll out a jumble of blueprints and spend hours comparing architectural and equipment drawings.

"Nine times out of ten in this situation, you're looking at structural steel drawings from a different contractor from the one who designed the equipment," says Brian Dodds, director of manufacturing engineering for Searle, based in Skokie, Ill. "The two sets of drawings are not to the same scale, and they are not combined on one piece of paper, so it's difficult to marry up the different elements visually." That difficulty translates into time and money.

 

To read the entire article you must log in:

Most of our content — all daily news, blogs, and videos — is free. Magazine stories are paid. To read this story, you must have a subscription or you must use a reading credit. Registration to Technology Review is free and entitles registrants to three free reading credits.

Username or REGISTER
Password  
   
 
Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Meet 2011 TR35 Winner Jesse Robbins

More

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Applied Materials

Lyric Semiconductor

Complete Genomics

Akamai

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement