Mims's Bits

Microwave-Powered Rocket Ascends without Fuel

A scale model is further proof that beamed-energy propulsion works.

Christopher Mims 09/07/2010

  • 8 Comments

Early this year, scientists in Japan successfully "launched" a tiny metal rocket using an unusual source of thrust - microwaves. The test was the latest a proof of principle for a kind of propulsion that has never been the beneficiary of the levels of investment poured into traditional chemical rockets, but which its proponents say could some day be a superior way to get spacecraft into orbit.

Sending rockets into space using a combustible mixture of on-board fuel isn't an optimal solution to the problem of escaping Earth's deep gravity well. Not only is it dangerous to strap humans and satellites on top of giant bombs, it's also incredibly wasteful: 90% of the weight of a rocket sitting on the launch pad is fuel.

In the beginning of the 20th century, it occurred to Russian rocket scientist Konstantin Tsiolkovsky that there was another way: by keeping the energy source on the ground and beaming the required power to a rocket, it could be launched with very little fuel on board.

With the invention of the maser, or microwave laser, scientists were granted a tool to realize Tsiolkovsky's dream. So in the 1970's they began to model just what it would take. Some were optimistic about its potential to decrease the cost of going to orbit by orders of magnitude, but the bottom line is that, for a lack of funding, the technology never took off.

Every few years, however, someone reminds the world that it's at least possible to get a rocket off the ground with little or no fuel. The latest demonstration used a Gyrotron - essentially a maser - at the Naka Fusion Institute of the Japan Atomic Energy Agency. (This super high-powered microwave beam emitter was originally developed as part of Japan's contribution to ITER, the international effort to create a workable fusion reactor.)

Using this beam, the scientists were able to send pulses of microwave energy into the bottom of their hollow 126 gram rocket model, heating the air within to 10,000 degrees Celsius and resulting in its rapid expansion. The result is a little boom, "like thunder," they report.

Here's a never-before-seen video of the launch:

The rocket traveled 1.2 meters into the air - the world record for such a craft is 72 meters and 12.7 seconds of flight, accomplished in 2001.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

rsanchez1

213 Comments

  • 523 Days Ago
  • 09/07/2010

nice demo

The video was a nice proof-of-concept of using microwaves to propel a craft upward. I wonder how well it scales. It heats the air on the bottom of that little thing to 10,000 degrees. If scaled to a full-size craft, like a space shuttle-sized craft, what effect would it have on the surrounding atmosphere? What effect would transmission of such amounts of energy, and having it concentrated on the small area of a shuttle flying hundreds of miles into the sky, have on the lower atmosphere?

Moreover, that little thing seemed to take off almost instantly. Small rockets do that as well, but how quickly would a full-sized craft take off? If it quickly accelerates, it might not be good for humans or delicate cargo (such as space telescopes).

Reply

doanwon

76 Comments

  • 523 Days Ago
  • 09/07/2010

Re: nice demo

Lots of work is needed for true scaled functionality.  I would think that variable power or multiple thrust pockets could be fired incrementally.  Then they would have to design the thruster so that airflow can quickly fill the heated void.  They can even eject on-board air into the thruster pocket once the atmosphere can no longer deliver the thrust.  The launch of a rocket or shuttle is basically a controlled explosion so this should work in the same way.  I am probably blowing smoke so hope to hear from a real rocket scientist.

Reply

sanman

31 Comments

  • 523 Days Ago
  • 09/07/2010

Rocket or Jet?

Is this a rocket, or a jet? If the microwaves are heating air passing through the rocket, then doesn't that mean it can only travel where there is air?

Reply

mkogrady

423 Comments

  • 522 Days Ago
  • 09/08/2010

Maser Power - flip the source

Theoretically a space based maser that derives it power from solar panels could be used as a heat source for ground based electrical power generation. Can a Maser be targeted to hit a specific point on the ground (in this case a boiler of some type) where steam can be generated?

Optionally - a maser could be pointed at the ocean surface to increase surface temps to increase rainfall by tracking storm routes off the oceans where they hit landfall. The Indian Ocean could be heated to provide increase humidity in the clouds so when they run into the Himalaya mountain range to increase fresh water supplies. Ideally this could be done in winter months to trap the water in the ice packs.

Reply

rsanchez1

213 Comments

  • 522 Days Ago
  • 09/08/2010

Re: Maser Power - flip the source

I know they fire lasers to the moon and get reflections back. However, those work by optical wavelengths, and microwaves are in a part of the spectrum that is easily scattered by the atmosphere, so that would have a big effect on the efficiency of energy transfer. If they could go to longer wavelengths, down to radio, and still have the directed precision of a maser, they could transfer energy from space as you said.

About heating the ocean, I don't think that's something we want to be doing now. We should wait until we have a clear understanding of how localized heating of the ocean affects climate on the coast. The understanding we have now is basically hotter ocean means more rain, but we can't say what would happen if a region of the ocean is heated by microwaves, not to mention the effect it might have on animal life in the vicinity of the heating.

Reply

mkogrady

423 Comments

  • 521 Days Ago
  • 09/09/2010

Re: Maser Power - flip the source

Penetration of Masers on water surfaces can be tested in a swimming pool by mounting a maser on an overhead structure of some type and firing the beam into the pool. Underwater thermal cameras can detect temperature changes and measure the depth at which they penetrate.

The test can pre-measure water volumes, and temps as well as measure the humidity levels of the pool area (assuming an indoor pool) before the test.

Reply

UncleAl

409 Comments

  • 521 Days Ago
  • 09/09/2010

Area vs. volume

Thrust obtains as the projected normal area of the exhaust bell. Mass obtains as the unlimited volume of the rocket above.  As with Coriolis thrusters, ion kites, optical levitation... the small scale model has no bearing on its full scale implimentation because the universe is nonlinear.

An elephant is not an especially large mouse.

Reply

Advertisement

mithraltim

3 Comments

  • 516 Days Ago
  • 09/14/2010

why one or the other?

Why not use this technology in combination with existing rockets to superheat the hot expanding exhaust gases?  If the exhaust is hotter then it will expand more, resulting in less fuel needed.

Reply

Bio

Christopher Mims is a journalist who covers technology and science for just about everybody.

Subscribe to the Mims's Bits RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement