Simson Garfinkel's blog

iPhone, uPhone

Why I want Apple's new iPhone.

Simson Garfinkel 01/11/2007

  • 4 Comments
The Apple iPhone (above) debuted Tuesday, January 9, at Macworld.
Credit: Apple

Steve Jobs was exaggerating when he said that Apple's iPhone would be as groundbreaking a product as the original Macintosh and the iPod. The iPhone is not the first cell phone to run a Unix operating system: many cell phones today run a stripped-down version of the Linux operating system. And cell phones with touch screens that you can finger are common as well: instead of taking out the stylus, I usually run my Treo 750p with my thumb and index finger. Nevertheless, the iPhone does have a number of important innovations that are easy to miss in all the hype.

The first important iPhone innovation is the sensors that make it aware of its environment. According to Jobs, the iPhone has a proximity sensor that disables the screen and touch pad when you place the phone next to your head, saving both power and preventing your ear from accidentally hanging up on someone. Another sensor figures out which way is down, allowing the screen to automatically switch from portrait to landscape mode when you turn it on its side. The third sensor detects the amount of ambient light and lowers the intensity of the backlight accordingly. That's a great idea, although I had a clock that had such a sensor back in the 1970s. Perhaps Steve had the same clock.

The second innovation is the iPhone's new interface, which is based on gestures rather than on mouse clicks. The danger with a gesture-based interface is that the gestures that work aren't immediately obvious. Apparently, you can zoom into the iPhone's windows by pressing the touch screen with two fingers and then spreading them apart. My guess is that most of the phone's users won't figure this out. As the adjacent photo shows, the phone also has a theme of light buttons on a dark background; we'll see people find that more usable than the interfaces that dominate on phones today.

Mostly, though, the phone reflects good, solid engineering--what we've come to expect from Apple and what seems sadly lacking from most other players in the market. The phone is 11.6 millimeters thin, yet it has a touch screen, an ultra-high-resolution display, a two-megapixel camera, and five hours of battery life for talking and video, sixteen hours for music. Apple hasn't released the specs, but the phone clearly has a fast microprocessor. At $499 for the four-gigabyte version and $599 for the eight-gigabyte version (plus a two-year contract from Cingular), people have said that this phone is too expensive for the U.S. market. Although that's certainly cheaper than a smart phone or an iPod, it remains to be seen if the market will feel the same way.

I'll be purchasing two iPhones as soon as they're available: one for myself, to replace my Treo 750p, and one for my wife, to replace her Sidekick.

For more on the iPhone, check out the series of still shots at Engadget, which shows Jobs putting a phone specially wired to generate external video through its paces.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

rwn3

6 Comments

  • 1860 Days Ago
  • 01/12/2007

visual voice mail

The iPhone to me is compelling only in the creative and meticulous design and the fact that it is the best example to date of convergence in action.

The real innovation (and the thing I've always wanted) is not even on the phone.  It's the visual voice mail, co-developed with their mobile-phone partner, that allows random access to voice mail.  We'll see what comes of it.

Reply

gabrielg01

450 Comments

  • 1859 Days Ago
  • 01/13/2007

No 3G on iHype

This "breakthrough internet communications device" does not have 3G. Would someone please explain Mr. Jobs that he is taking the hype a bit too far? Thanks!

Reply

mswisher

5 Comments

  • 1857 Days Ago
  • 01/15/2007

Both Companies Got What They Wanted

I think this is a very well executed "AD CAMPAIGN" on Apple's part. The money they will make from the negative advertising and media attention will far off set the royalties they end up giving Cisco. However ultimately I see the name changing to satisfy the courts and Cisco and a counter suit being filed for the costs of doing so, as well as a suit that would hold Cisco at fault for trying to capitalize from the obvious "i" marketing campaign that has made Apple's name sin ominous with it.

Reply

HMR_in_SV

1 Comment

  • 1734 Days Ago
  • 05/18/2007

iPhone much more than you think

Yesterday, I had the chance to watch the iPhone in real world use by someone well acquainted with its capabilities, the iPhone's inventor Apple's Scott Forstall.  Our children attend the same elementary school.

While marketing and PR are pushing the 'phone' part of the product, this is really a small part of the whole package.  This device is a palm sized Macintosh with new (UI) user interface designed for the finger to palm concept of expressing commands.  It is really quite brilliant and will open a new opportunity in individual communications and personal information processing.

Prior to seeing it in action, I was quite skeptical of the greater value proposition.  This device more than replaces a person's MP3 player, handheld PIM, and cell phone in a beautiful package.  It is going to enable new ways of being mobile with your data and connections.  Imagine taking a Mac in the palm of your hand with applications that use it alone, through the Internet and with cellular services.  Amazing!  You have to see it in action to really "get it."

At $500, it is easily worth the cost using comparables.  I really want it.  But, I don't want to change Mobile Service Providers.  Is it enough to make me switch to Cingular from Verizon?  Not with early penalty clauses in my cellular contract.
--Harrison Rose

Reply

Bio

A commonsense take on computer security, usability and why IT does matter.

Subscribe to the Simson Garfinkel's blog RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement