Potential Energy

Cape Wind Farm Finally Approved

After nine years of reviews, the Cape Wind project gets the go-ahead.

Kevin Bullis 04/28/2010

  • 6 Comments

The Cape Wind offshore wind project, which could be the first built in the U.S., has been approved by U.S. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar. The decision, announced today, comes after nearly 10 years of political opposition, environmental reviews, and most recently objections from local Indian tribes.

Because of these objections, Salazar is requiring that the project be scaled back from 170 wind turbines to 130 wind turbines and that the developer conduct more marine archeological surveys. He is also requiring "other steps" to make them less visible, such as the coloring of the turbines and their lighting.

Salazar acknowledged that the permitting process was a mess. "There's no reason an offshore wind permit should take a decade," he said. He's working on streamlining the process.

Lawsuits could yet delay the project further. But Salazar thinks these can be overcome. "We are very confident that we will be able to uphold the decision against legal challenges that might be filed," he said.

Massachusetts Governor Duvall Patrick says construction could begin within a year.

Salazar presented the project as a way to help the United States keep up with other countries' efforts on offshore wind, such as European countries and China. But it might not make sense to "keep up" in this area. Although offshore winds provide an enormous potential resource, there are much cheaper places to generate wind power in the United States. It might make more sense to let other countries drive down costs of offshore wind while focusing on developing the cheapest possible on-shore wind power.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

devassocx

110 Comments

  • 649 Days Ago
  • 04/29/2010

cape wind power

Teddy must be rolling in his grave at this.

All the rich dudes in that area are probably mad
as H**l that their precious view is going to be
marred.

Interesting that these big windmills are good enough for the rest of us but these guys resisted
for as long as they could.

Reply

fsutton

3 Comments

  • 649 Days Ago
  • 04/29/2010

best practices

I hope that we will leave the us versus them behind and remember that this is our planet. Thus the question is "what is best for our planet?".
If there is a "best practices" or some such document that is in place ahead of time, then the process for decision making might be more transparent and faster.
In the case of the Cape wind farm, have significant potential problems been listed and potential solutions presented? For example, firstly, what if there is an oil spill from the gear boxes of the turbines? Would such a spill be easily and rapidly contained? Would the cost of clean up as well as the cost of damage to the ecosystem outweigh the benefits of energy production? Let's have some numbers from impartial groups.
Secondly, is this the best form of energy for this location.  Is there no value to wave action for energy production? Why not the Cape Wave Farm? If the technology has not been worked out, then maybe this site can serve for a feasibility study.
In the plains, as the wind blows across the praries, the windmills do not sit on top of another source of energy.  It is not redundant. Placing windmills on top of water with significant wave energy suggests a level of redundancy that we might wish to review.

I hope that we can have great discussions about the renewable forms of energy. Let's pause as we observe the battle to contain the oil slick off our coast and consider the best practices to maintain the balance between energy production and being good stewards of the environment.

Reply

barnacle bill

2 Comments

  • 649 Days Ago
  • 04/29/2010

off shore wind

If your concerned about the Impacts from climate change then this is great news. Re the oil spill from the turbine; I would guess that it is less than 25 gal if that. Trivial.  Views from the beach?  remember the trade offs - Billions of oil dollars leaving America every year; Coal burning putting mercury, lead, arsenic and CO2 into our environment.
Dead miners, etc..  Many more birds die hitting high rise buildings than will ever die on this windmills. 

Reply

fsutton

3 Comments

  • 649 Days Ago
  • 04/29/2010

response

The discussion is about development of a document of best practices which could be in place before projects are reviewed. The hope being that such a document would make the process more transparent for all and reduce the time of the review. The discussion is also about using our combined intellect to develop new and better ideas. The  oil from gear boxes of turbines may indeed be a very small amount/turbine. Maybe it might not be seen as a problem by some. The "best practice document" could provide actual numbers that allows a review of such data on turbines as well as on all other energy development projects. Proposed solutions to potential problems would be a requirement for all entities desiring to develop any energy generating farm.  I hope the discussion does not get bugged down. I know that the review on the cape farm has gone on for 10+ years. However, we can still consider alternative strategies.
1. Can we develop wave power and if not why not? Is this a technology we can decide to invest in?
2. If we can develop wave power, might we want to consider placing these turbines somewhere else to produce wind energy and use the intended "cape farm" area to produce wave energy thus maximizing energy production while maintaining environmental stewardship?

Thanks

Reply

fsutton

3 Comments

  • 648 Days Ago
  • 04/30/2010

ocean energy

I was delighted to hear about the progress being made on capturing the ocean energy. However the cuisinart effect could be a problem.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=16713781

Does anyone have ideas to suggest for an alternative to turbines. It seems the most simple and efficient but are we missing something?

Reply

nikkirao

1 Comment

  • 631 Days Ago
  • 05/17/2010

wind turbine

Wind turbines are used to generate electricity from the kinetic power of the wind. Historical they were more frequently used as a mechanical device to turn machinery. http://www.windturbinestar.com/

Reply

Bio

Kevin Bullis is Technology Review’s energy editor.

Subscribe to the Potential Energy RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement