Potential Energy

U.S. Congress Worries about Materials Shortages

Rare earth minerals are key to advanced technology, but almost all come from China.

Kevin Bullis 03/17/2010

  • 5 Comments

From wind turbines to cell phones, rare earth minerals play a big role in advanced technology, and they could be key for future clean energy. But congress is worried about the fact that almost all of these materials come from China, and could be subject to tight export controls by that country's government.

The subject was discussed yesterday at a hearing, where experts called on the U.S. government to take steps not only to promote domestic production of these materials, but to fund research to find ways to recycle them, to use less of them, and to do without them altogether.

The work has already started. In one recent example, the new Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy, recently awarded $4.5 million to develop motors and generators that use magnetics containing low amounts of rare-earth materials. The project is ambitious:

High energy permanent magnets are critical components in the new energy economy due to their widespread use in advanced motors for hybrids and electric vehicles and in advanced wind turbine generators, and the currently dominant Nd-Fe-B magnets use materials that are not domestically available and are subject to critical supply disruptions. If successful, this project will return the U.S. to global leadership in advanced magnetic materials and will facilitate the widespread deployment of low cost hybrid and electric vehicles and wind power using domestically available materials and dramatically decrease U.S. oil imports and greenhouse gas emissions.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

dconner3905

5 Comments

  • 693 Days Ago
  • 03/17/2010

Rare earth is a misnomer

I fully support recycling, and yes having a plan-b is a good idea if all your supplies come from a place that you may engage in a trade war with any day now…

From chemistry of the elements by greenwood and earnshaw 2nd ed p1229 "Apart from the unstable Pm … the lanthanides are actually not rare.  Cerium (66 ppm in the earth’s crust) is the 26th most abundant element, being half as abundant as Chlorine and five times more abundant than Pb (lead).  Even Tm the rarest after Pm is more abundant than iodine.”   P 1330 “Mostly these are found together and in monazite and bastaesite where there are deposits in India, south Africa, Brazil, Australia, Malaysia… and the Sierra Nevada in the USA and China”

Thus, if we’re willing to mine it at home in the US it is ours. 

Also, no one should fault China for buying up the mines in Africa and elsewhere.  For that country, that policy is preferable economically and strategically speaking relative to say buying the dollar.

Reply

artem

1 Comment

  • 687 Days Ago
  • 03/23/2010

Re: Rare earth is a misnomer

Actually I think they are rare, in the sense that they are not concentrated, and so you'd have to use an enormous supply of energy to separate them from whatever piece of earth's crust you use.  That is why mining of traditional metals is done in ore deposits and veins, because the metal is concentrated.  There seems to be no quick, easy, or low cost fix to our rare earths conundrum.

Reply

pierhogunn

1 Comment

  • 693 Days Ago
  • 03/17/2010

Rare Earth availability

IIRC I saw a special about the rare-earths and one of the points that the producers made is that while raw rare earths are available here, the production methods currently employed are/were dirty enough that the "Not In My Backyard" problem comes in to play, and additionally the time to build the lost refining ability at home makes it quite possible that even if we were to start building the facilities today we would be several years away from being able to produce these readily available raw materials.  In the mean time, it is quite possible that our friends across the pacific would see this as a threat to their current production, and tighten control to drive up profit virtually strangling the industries that are so dependent upon these things.  Especially the "green" industries that are so popular with the current political leadership, and what these people view as one of the keys to our long term economic recovery...

damned if we do, damned if we dont

Reply

Staberdearth

7 Comments

  • 672 Days Ago
  • 04/07/2010

We are reaping what we have sown

As a materials engineer I have followed this issue for years in my career. I find it par for the course for the legally braindead and myopic in Congress. They are actually surprised that this issue has now come back to bite them in their hindbrains since they have essentially for years allowed enviro whacko dominated demands to put our backs up against the wall regarding domestic bans on the mining and beneficiating of rare earth materials. Now these rare earth metals play a critical role in many of today's technologies. The Chinese knew this and kowtowed to no agendized and whiny one track interests other than their own countries' economic and security issues. The western mind, and typified by the US politician (fill in derogatory adjectives if you'd like..), thinks in terms of months, quarters, and the next election term...The Chinese think in terms of decades, scores, and centuries...

Reply

gsosbee

3 Comments

  • 624 Days Ago
  • 05/25/2010

fbi/cia and congress of usa

The corrupt,cowardly criminals in congress  cover up crimes
by the fbi/cia and in return the fbi/cia allow them to do pretty much as they please.
http://www.newciv.org/nl/newslog.php/_v194/__show_article/_a000194-000201.htm

Reply

Bio

Kevin Bullis is Technology Review’s energy editor.

Subscribe to the Potential Energy RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement