Potential Energy

German Solar Industry Could Soon Collapse

What could that mean for attempts to grow solar manufacturing in the United States?

Kevin Bullis 02/19/2010

  • 19 Comments

Because of its generous incentives program, Germany, a country that gets about as much sun as the darkest parts of the United States, has become the largest market for solar power in the world. That in turn has helped create a thriving solar manufacturing industry in the country. Because of its success, the German system has been imitated around the world in places such as Spain and China. At renewable energy conferences, industry experts plead for a similar system in the United States.

But even as it's hailed as an example, Germany's federal government has started to cut back on the program, and plans to cut it even more by April. If that happens, it could devastate the German solar industry, and send shockwaves through the industry around the world. It could also reveal what could be the inherent weaknesses of the approach--it doesn't address the fact that it's cheaper to manufacture solar panels in China.

Germany's system is something called a feed-in tariff. If you install solar panels in Germany, utilities are required to buy the power they generate at a fixed price. The price is high enough that anyone who installs such a system will, provided solar panels work, make a decent amount of money on the investment--around a 6 to 9 percent annual return, although the amount depends on the cost of the solar panels. The utilities then pass the cost of this program along to consumers, raising electricity bills by a couple of cents per kilowatt hour. Many experts praise this system because it seems more fair than a general tax or federal subsidies (which amount to a general tax, since the government pays for the subsidies). In the feed-in tariff system, consumers who use more electricity have to pay more to subsidize renewable energy, rather than everyone paying the same amount. By raising electricity prices, it could also provide incentives for people to reduce their electricity consumption and so reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

From the beginning, the system was designed to gradually require utilities to pay lower and lower prices for renewable electricity--the goal is to encourage solar and other renewable energy companies to find ways to lower the cost of their products. In theory, eventually solar panels would be cheap enough that they could compete with conventional electricity without government help. But now the government wants to cut it much faster than was planned, and that has solar companies very worried.

According to one study, by Landesbank Baden-Wurttemberg, a bank based in Stuttgart, Germany, the cutbacks would cause almost all German solar manufacturers to go out of business. That's because the lower rates will drive customers to select lower-priced solar panels made in China. According to one such manufacturer, Schott Solar, "this decision will benefit low-wage Chinese manufacturers and endanger tens of thousands of jobs in Germany, more than 1,000 at Schott alone."

According to Schott, customers have been willing to pay a premium for their solar panels, expecting them to be of higher quality and to last longer than Chinese solar panels. But with a lower feed in tariff, their solar panels won't look like a good investment. And there's just no way they can compete with the Chinese on price alone.

Germany's domestic solar manufacturing is beginning to look like a house of cards, but things look even worse for the incipient solar industry in the United States. The Recovery Act and other legislation is geared toward increasing the solar market in the U.S., in an attempt to increase the size of the solar industry here. If established solar companies in Germany can't compete with China, how will new solar companies in the U.S. fare--especially if they plan to manufacture here? In one recent example, a U.S. solar company, Evergreen Solar, announced that it would have to give up on assembling solar panels at a U.S. factory in favor of manufacturing in China.

One thing seems clear, fostering a solar market in the U.S. or Germany is not enough in itself to create and maintain solar manufacturing jobs in these countries. To compete, companies in these countries will need to find ways to make cheaper solar panels. And they'll probably need strong government incentives to build factories in their home countries.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

alfaeco

4 Comments

  • 718 Days Ago
  • 02/19/2010

Artificial markets always collapse

All markets maintained thanks to artificial conditions do eventually collapse. No good investment in the long run

Reply

doanwon

76 Comments

  • 718 Days Ago
  • 02/19/2010

Re: Artificial markets always collapse

That is unfortunate because a large part of the Obama stimulus money is allocated to develop solar energy.  So the money will wind up stimulating the Chinese solar industry instead of the US.

Subsidies should work for a while as the companies transition to installation and maintenance.  The benefits are also doubled when some residents become energy positive--sell energy.  So it's not a total collapse.  Hopefully, in a few years newer technologies in solar harvesting--which we have been reading on here in abundance--will make US manufacturing more competitive then.

Reply

GaryB

119 Comments

  • 717 Days Ago
  • 02/20/2010

Re: Artificial markets always collapse

This is just non-sense. Silicon chips were an artificial market -- very expensive devices bought only by gov funds from Nasa and the miliary, but that started a real market. The internet was a total gov affair, no private company could or would ever build such a thing ... but once it was built, it did OK.

Reply

StupidPeasant

98 Comments

  • 715 Days Ago
  • 02/22/2010

Re: Artificial markets always collapse

Government R&D is OK, but the government did not need to force an artifical market for chips or internet. The value of the chips and internet stood on their own in the Market Place.
Solar is not there yet.

Reply

Gcanno

24 Comments

  • 715 Days Ago
  • 02/22/2010

Re: Artificial markets always collapse

The bottom line is that China subsidizes most of it's industries and manipulates or floats it's currency. so i do not understand which artificial market you were talking about. Along with that  most of the Industries that go to China do not adhere to even the most minimal of environmental standards.

This is creating a massive epidemic- of health related illnesses and deaths, which number in the millions each year. Add to that slave workforce that has NO prospect of even petitioning it's government for basic rights.

Their is Nothing Free in Free trade. I believe in Trade but fair trade, and this is not it. Purposely allowing millions to die in pursuit of sheer profit by skirting otherwise legal barriers in developed countries , in my book is murder. And at that Premeditated.

If developed countries had to swap the air they breath with China's air for free, I assure you developed countries would not believe it was fair or free trade. 

Reply

calinuv

2 Comments

  • 717 Days Ago
  • 02/20/2010

why are Chinese solar panels so cheap?

The above comments are all from a consumer prospective and I do not agree with them. There has to be a reason why solar panels from china are more cheaper. It isn't the r&d because most of it is done in the US. It isn't the labor cost, because in some parts of the country people will work for almost nothing, and even if salaries wold be to low for normal Americans, I am sure that you will find a lot of Mexican people which wold be willing to work in such factories. Wold someone explain to me why are Chinese solar panels so cheap?

Reply

gabrielg01

450 Comments

  • 717 Days Ago
  • 02/20/2010

Re: why are Chinese solar panels so cheap?

1) Labor costs. In the south and south eastern industrial provinces, the average factory workers salary is between $50-$150/month. And they work grueling 12-hour shifts, 6 days a week. Not even illegal Mexican immigrants can match those. And by the way, if you place your factory in the poorer western provinces, you could squeeze out even lower wages in China. (there is in fact, an inland migration of factories, as companies try to keep their costs low)

2) No regulatory costs. Western companies must deal with a tremendous amount of regulatory costs. Your wastewater must be treated, the gas fumes must be filtered, industrial waste must be properly disposed of, et cetera...In China they don't care about any of that. Everything is just dumped into the environment. So that makes their operating costs much lower (the fact that solar panels are supposed to be eco-friendly is lost on them).

Reply

Advertisement

ssamd

18 Comments

  • 715 Days Ago
  • 02/22/2010

Re: why are Chinese solar panels so cheap?

Point one, who would buy things if everyone worked essentially as wage slaves.  Encouraging people to work for less seems to take us in that direction. 
Point two, the term "regulatory costs" is vague language.  There is a certain cost to manufacturing, either all of it is included in the price or you pass some of the cost on to the planet which brings us back to point one slavery, slavery of the planet.  

Reply

kflorek

1 Comment

  • 619 Days Ago
  • 05/29/2010

Re: why are Chinese solar panels so cheap?

The ultimate reason is somewhat different than "wages" or the exchange rate. You have to take into account that a given amount of dollars there buys more food and such than the same numerical amount in the USA. But a Chinese worker still gets less for his work in terms of real goods and services (than say an illegal US immigrant.)

In manufacturing, the Chinese also put less into manufacturing a particular good, besides wages, than a manufacturer in the US, things that don't appear in the literal product. For instance, "cleaning up", such as waste treatment and anti-pollution measures. Taxes, law suits.

Why do the Chinese work for such low real wages? It is better than the other choices available to them. It is no doubt better than what they have been accustomed to in Chinese history.

In the end, we can get more of what we value because they receive less of things we value. Some of the very expensive things they don't get, such as an improved environment, don't matter much to them, so it is not as poor a deal from their point of view.

Reply

flyingmonster

29 Comments

  • 715 Days Ago
  • 02/22/2010

currency rates

One cause of much of the world's pain right now is caused by the exchange rate between the Chinese currency and others. Until the Renminbi is allowed to float we are in serious trouble and it is going to get worse. Although China is a member of the WTO they appear to me to pick and choose how they comply and cry foul when others do. We are dreaming to believe that our exports to China will rise proportionally with their growth. They have growing domination in all areas of manufacture. All countries should impose a tariff on imports from China that is equal to the imbalance in their currency rates. Being a member of the WTO should require by default a floating currency, standard labor and environmental laws.

Reply

StupidPeasant

98 Comments

  • 715 Days Ago
  • 02/22/2010

Even China will fail

Robotic manufacturing will someday replace most all cheep labor. Then what will happen Mr. economist?

Reply

xmichaelx

5 Comments

  • 715 Days Ago
  • 02/22/2010

Re: Even China will fail

Robotic labor will replace almost all manual labor? I haven't heard that nonsense since the early '80s, and it was just as ridiculous then.

Reply

prime3end

13 Comments

  • 715 Days Ago
  • 02/22/2010

Surprise! U.S. companies= economic traitors

The article suggests that the only way solar is economically feasible is if we make them in China.  That is patently false.  Sure, the panels would be cheaper, but at what cost!  The true cost of exporting work to China is a terrible cost to the U.S. middle class.  The cost of not implementing solar and wind on an even grander scale than Germany, is , per the USEPA, 60,000 to 100,000 American deaths per year from burning coal, and a standard of living that continues to sink.  This country needs to understand that letting unregulated greed run amok will always result in the same things, death, lower living standards here, and a diversion away from clean energy.  Ayn Rand was wrong, Reagan was wrong, Ford was wrong, both Bushes were wrong,, for America. 

Reply

devassocx

110 Comments

  • 715 Days Ago
  • 02/22/2010

Re: Surprise! U.S. companies= economic traitors

Prime3end...Its to live in a dream world to believe that you can somehow legislate wealth.

You can shift wealth from one group to another
via legislation so you might present the illusion
that you have done that.

Reply

Advertisement

bgoedecke

1 Comment

  • 715 Days Ago
  • 02/22/2010

solar energy & cost of transport

There is irony in this.  The premise of the hydrogen economy is that hydrogen will replace fossil fuels as transport fuel.  One way that could happen is that alternative energy such as solar is use to produce hydrogen.  That would require high prices for transport.  High prices for transport (probably) means that oil markets are stressed.  If all the panels are being made in China, transport costs will start to be substantial.  High cost for fuel will probably mean less than stable conditions world-wide, making transport and finance less reliable.  Some may say, well if the situation is untenable for manufacturing in China, then it will come back to (Germany, US).  However, it takes time to develop the infrastructure needed to support such processes.  If one views oil supplies as not reliable in the long term, then one may consider continued support for manufacturing in the local environment.  Also, the position of the Chinese is probably enhanced by their currency policy. 

Reply

bravov40

3 Comments

  • 711 Days Ago
  • 02/26/2010

Re: solar energy & cost of transport

another viewpoint - New lower cost of solar technology as we are seeing announce frequently will lower the break-even point for solar hydrogen production without very high oil prices. The question is how soon can these new technologies can be funded and brought to market. 
This is a good example
"California-based Amyris has used breakthroughs in synthetic biology to reinvent biofuels. To turn its technology into an industrial process, it has headed to the land of sugar: Brazil. "
http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/24554/?nlid=2769

Reply

rvandell

22 Comments

  • 715 Days Ago
  • 02/22/2010

See the big picture folks

As long as China remains communist, nobody (even robots) will be able to compete with them.

Instead of the WTO whining about the new Chinese policy of "China must buy Made in China", it would better serve the worlds economy
to encourage this, as it would kill two birds with the same stone. We get mfg. back, they have to figure out a way to make a profit from
$50/wk  workers, who have absolutely no use for solar panels anyway.

The western worldview is not the Chinese government view, never has been, probably never will be, hence “the wall”.

Reply

skingw

31 Comments

  • 715 Days Ago
  • 02/22/2010

Stop whining, Americans!

As a Chinese, I see the key factor in our success of producing cheaper goods are basically 3 things:

1) we are working harder
   Some Americans say 50$ ~ 150$ salary is for slave workers only. You are missing two things: 1) if we don't do that kind of job, we would starve to death like poor africans. and nobody forces us to take those jobs 2) our wages are rising year by year, much faster than you.

2) highly efficient trading / logistics networks brought in by Globalisation.
  Most of our export were at least first set up by western companies. And our export industry finds that it's cheaper /easier to deal with western customers than locals. Many export companies tried to start selling things to local markets in these two years, and only found it costs more to do so as they don't have a Walmart to support them.

3) Simpler bureaucracy system with economic development as the highest priority
  The good thing of this system is that we don't need to worry that some stupid red-head leaders may take us into some stupid wars or stalin systems, as economic development doesn't like either. The bad thing is that social / environmental cost are high. The balance here is the key. We are still looking for it.

So for you Americans, though I don't like your whining and biased view towards us, you actually got more advantages than us. You have already point 2 and 3, and you are now working / saving harder than before. You will have no problems.

Just stop whining and start working.
  

Reply

doanwon

76 Comments

  • 714 Days Ago
  • 02/23/2010

Re: Stop whining, Americans!

You have been blinded by misplaced nationalism and propaganda by your own government.  The Chinese government does not play by the rules of free enterprise and adopt all practices that gives China unfair advantages over other trading countries.  Most eastern cultures do not have forward looking mentality.  They destroy the good system that made 'the piggy fat'.  All you have to do is to revisit the tainted milk, the lead paint in toys, the bad chemicals in side walls, and on and on...

1) It's true you are hard working.  But you should be grateful that the civilized world (especially the Bushes who gave you Most Favored status and the WTO) decided to bring your country into the fold.  They did it assuming that the government had the integrity to play by the rules.  With such tremendous trade imbalance that you have over everyone else (causing severe burden of trade deficits for us to bear), you should have raised your currency much higher.  Instead, you pegged your money on the dollar, which does not hurt you even if it hurts us.

2) Those who play the free enterprise game are blind to profit--that is their goal.  If China can produce the goods cheaper, then they'll go for that.  If China (government) plays by the rules then they should make monetary adjustments accordingly.

3) Not simple bureaucracy but unfair systematic adoption of practices by your sinister communist government to gain advantage over the free enterprise participants.  Don't you know what free enterprise means?  Yes, your leaders are not stupid but are evil.

How can we save if we have no jobs left because they've all gone to China!  Who will buy the toys that you've made for 50$ a week if we don't spend?  Do you understand what free enterprise means?  Your country is killing the 'piggy' with cheap lead.

Personally, I think your government is evil.  Why do everyone of your poor neighbors fear and despise your country?  Name me a country that adores yours.  Please. (ed: Hope you mention N. Korea.)

Reply

Bio

Kevin Bullis is Technology Review’s energy editor.

Subscribe to the Potential Energy RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement