Potential Energy

Scientists Overcome Obstacle to Fusion

The world's largest laser system has uniformly compressed and superheated a fuel capsule.

Kevin Bullis 01/28/2010

  • 11 Comments

One of the key outstanding questions about whether it's possible to use lasers to ignite fusion has been answered. A huge, stadium-sized laser facility at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Livermore, CA, uniformly compressed and heated a tiny capsule to very high temperatures. The experiments confirmed a theory the scientists there had about how to control the energy from 192 high-power lasers to compress the spherical capsule evenly from all sides.

Siegfried Glenzer, the Plasma Physics Group Leader at LLNL, says that the experiments clear away a major hurdle on the way to igniting fusion, a self-sustaining reaction of the sort that powers the sun. He says there's a good chance the researchers will achieve this goal by the end of the year. If they're successful, the facility will allow scientists to study the inner workings of stars and nuclear weapons in a controlled lab setting. It could also lead to a new type of power plant that runs on abundant hydrogen isotopes.

Igniting fusion requires extremely high temperatures and pressures, achieved by applied energy evenly to the entire surface of a spherical fuel capsule. To do this, the researchers plan to put the sphere--which measures a couple of millimeters across, inside a small gold can called a hohlraum. The lasers would enter the can from the ends and hit its interior walls. Each of the 192 lasers would come in at a different angle. When the lasers collide with the walls of the hohlraum, they produce X-rays which are supposed to bath the sphere uniformly.

But the researchers knew that the energy likely wouldn't be distributed perfectly. To correct for this, they proposed the following solution:

As the lasers enter the hohlraum, they interact with each other, producing an interference pattern, which in turn creates a plasma with regularly spaced dense areas alternating with less dense areas. This produces a sort of "grating" which acts as a prism. This prism that diffracts different colors of light to different degrees. The researchers hypothesized they could fine tune the distribution of the laser energy by very slightly altering the wavelength of the laser light. The recent experiments, reported in the journal Science, confirmed that this works. After a series of laser shots, in which they gradually altered the color of the laser, they compressed the spherical capsule evenly, and were able to heat it up to 3.3 million degrees Kelvin.

By extrapolating from these results, they scientist say they should be able to achieve fusion using the laser system at Livermore, which was officially opened last year. Glenzer says this could happen by the end of the year.

Obstacles remain, however. To make it work, they'll have to crank up the lasers, doubling their output compared to these initial experiments. In so doing, they'll be trying to approximately double the amount the sphere gets compressed, which will require very precisely timed laser pulses. What's more, so far they haven't included the deuterium and tritium fuel in the capsule for the tests. They've demonstrated they can create and maintain the precise fuel layers needed in the lab, but not within the laser system, he says.

What's more, even if the researchers ignite fusion, it won't be in a form useful for generating electricity. Although the reactions will be self-sustaining, the amount of fuel in each capsule will be small, and so the duration of the burn will be brief. Generating electricity will mean developing a system that can ignite many capsules each second, and then capture the heat released to produce steam to power a turbine.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

dodanimal

6 Comments

  • 742 Days Ago
  • 01/28/2010

So what?

This machine-nor any like it-will never be able to produce useful amounts of fusion power. Even after spending billions, they are so far from this goal its laughable.

This project has one primary purpose: to study nuclear weapons so that the US government can wiggle around the test ban treaty. And for that the taxpayers have spent billions. Its a complete waste of time, money and scientific expertise. The hype about fusion power from this machine is pure marketing spin designed to distract people from that fact that this is a military project. It has no hope of achieving useful fusion. I doubt that it will even produce any research that is even useful for fusion energy.

Reply

spad12

58 Comments

  • 742 Days Ago
  • 01/28/2010

Re: So what?

While you are correct in the case that some of the research at NIF will be weapons related, you severely underestimate its contribution to fusion research as a whole.

The whole idea behind NIF is to study high density ignited plasmas. The conditions created during a shot will be incredibly close to the conditions that exist at the center of a star, and should yield in an estimated 50% fuel burn. The ability to observe a high density burning plasma will give a huge amount of insight into how burning plasmas behave.

In addition to looking at the plasma physics, the large flux of high energy neutrons will allow scientists to study the effects of such neutron fluxes on wall materials. They will have the ability to test tritium breeding blanket designs, and possibly fusion-fission hybrids. One possible use for this facility would be nuclear waste disposal. The neutrons produced from the implosion have enough energy to break down nuclear waste into much shorter lived isotopes, thus reducing the storage time required for waste.

Inertial confinement fusion has different needs than magnetic confinement, but research at NIF will be very beneficial to both.

Reply

Matthew Putman

37 Comments

  • 741 Days Ago
  • 01/29/2010

Re: So what?

While skepticism regarding the goal of the project is healthy, it has very little to do with the science. This is a major step towards a near perfect solution to energy. I know it is not coming soon, but I am happy to see that big ideas are not being ignored in favor of the inconsequential ones, such as were proposed in Copenhagen. This is good for science, and ultimately good for the planet. No doubt Livermore is still working on weapons, and that does make me skeptical about them. It doesn’t make me skeptical of the scientific findings though. The rest is politics.

Reply

  • 727 Days Ago
  • 02/12/2010

Re: So what?

Good grief! Another conspiracy theory. Why on earth would our evil military spend billions to improve our nuclear weapons? I can't think of any reason... It is absurd on its face; we don't need more powerful or more efficient nukes. We already have more than enough to destroy several Earths and are dismantling a good part of our nuclear arsenal at the present.

Reply

chiefjimbo

1 Comment

  • 741 Days Ago
  • 01/29/2010

This is great news...

...so let's resume inertial confinement fusion power production research. The most organized of these efforts, the High Average Power Laser Program, was cancelled this fiscal year. They had by far the most knowledge of harnessing this power for producing electricity.

http://aries.ucsd.edu/HAPL/

Reply

garycordell

5 Comments

  • 741 Days Ago
  • 01/29/2010

Papp Engines-- hoax or fusion?

I just want to know if anyone out there has looked at the Papp Engine (http://www.pappengine.com/-- resurected as the  "Plasmic Transition Process"-- see http://plasmiccontrol.com/)?  It is either a world class hoax or something akin to cold fusion. It has survived since the 1970's just under the radar as a working engine without any understanding of how it really works. And yes, Feynman declared it a hoax back then, but seemingly without actually investigating it.

Reply

Reptile

20 Comments

  • 741 Days Ago
  • 01/29/2010

Papp Engine?

I know nothing about the subject, but does this have anything to do with inertial confinement and fusion?  Or is it just off topic?

The work at Lawrence Livermore has implications for weapons testing, but as the above commenters have pointed out, this is also basic scientific/engineering research.  Expensive stuff that wouldn't have been paid for without the weapons testing aspects.

I find it amazing that the plasmas appear to be less unstable than predicted/feared, since instabilities in plasmas seem to have been a chief plague of all forms of fusion research since perhaps the 1950s. We have much to learn, and I fear the press releases may focus too much on potential infinite power resources. With properly developed solar, wind, and geothermal sources and technologies, etc., we may not even need nuclear energy in any form. And although the hope that we can get rid of toxic wastes is alluring, I'm not really counting on it as a practical option.

The understanding of fundamental states of matter, however, is very exciting, and could lead, even serendipitously, along many paths into little known regions of physics. At least so it would appear to this non-physicist who has been following the field since the 1970s.

Reply

Advertisement

Thucydides

35 Comments

  • 741 Days Ago
  • 01/29/2010

Scientists Overcome Obstacle to Fusion

Scientists overcame a theoretical obstacle to fusion energy, but there is no way that any serious investor will look at laser ICF as a practical approach to generating electrical energy. The capital costs for establishing a plant would be outragious, and the annual O&M would eat up any potential profit (assuming the gigantic carrying charges left you anything in the first place).

Remember the competition is generating electrical power by the Gigawatt and selling it for 10 cents/Kw-Hr or less.

Other schemes like magnetic confinement are also dead end toys for government scientists to play with, no practical generator will ever be possible using this technology either.

Until we break out of the straightjacket of massive government projects fusion will always be "20 years away". Time to start reporting on alternative approaches like Migma, Pollywell IEC, Magnetized Target Fusion (MTF) and dense plasma focus fusion which promise results without huge capital costs and 20 year experimental programs...

Reply

Brian H

60 Comments

  • 734 Days Ago
  • 02/05/2010

Re: Scientists Overcome Obstacle to Fusion

Right. One DPF project which is under the radar is the one at FocusFusion.org -- which is now targeting p-B11 fusion unity within a couple of years. Another 2 or 3 years should/would see the finalization of a licenseable prefab design, for use anywhere, of a small 5MW home-garage-sized generator. Construction/purchase costs and power pricing would be as low as 1/20 of current best retail rates.

That would pretty much render the alternatives 'economic roadkill', doncha think?

Reply

cobrasixtysix

14 Comments

  • 735 Days Ago
  • 02/04/2010

Scientists Overcome Obstacle to Fusion

Exciting stuff indeed, but for the immediate future I think we, as a planet, should be focusing on Geothermal Power generation, clean and practicaly limitless, doesnt get much better than that. Fusion is coming, but its a milenia away from where Geothermal is right now.

Reply

Brian H

60 Comments

  • 734 Days Ago
  • 02/05/2010

Re: Scientists Overcome Obstacle to Fusion

Not so clean and limitless as all that; it turns out the fluid use is rather drastically polluting, and the heat drawn from the ground is very slow to replenish, except at a few favored sites where the crust is fractured or thin.

Worse, it tends to end up being VERY pricey. Which means subsidies all 'round, indefinitely.

Reply

Bio

Kevin Bullis is Technology Review’s energy editor.

Subscribe to the Potential Energy RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement