Monday, December 07, 2009
EPA Closer to Regulating Greenhouse Gases
A new finding is intended to spur action at the Copenhagen climate change conference.
On the first day of the
Copenhagen climate change conference the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has found that
greenhouse gases constitute a threat to human health--a prerequisite for the
agency to start regulating the gases.
The timing of the announcement is
intended to boost efforts to reach a climate change agreement at the
conference. Many countries have criticized the lack of action on climate change
from the U.S., but now U.S. negotiators have an argument that their country is
taking greenhouse gases seriously. If Congress fails to legislate for greenhouse
gas emissions reductions, the EPA will step in.
"Today's action is a step
towards enduring, pragmatic solutions to the enormous challenge of climate
change," EPA administrator Lisa Jackson said (according to a copy of
her speech). "It also means that we arrive at the climate talks in
Copenhagen with a clear demonstration of our commitment to facing this global
challenge. We hope that today's announcement serves as another incentive for
far-reaching accords in our meetings this week."
Comments
VOTE OUT the PROGRESSIVES in 2010. We MUST take back control of government, AND this time, we must stay true to conservative, minimalist government roots.
RD
12/08/2009
Posts:138
claudioona
12/08/2009
Posts:1
tomlanzilott...
12/08/2009
Posts:5
Soon the EPA will claim jusrisdiction over our food supply. It will start controliing livestock, and will attempt to minimize meat consumption.
Soon it will start limiting pets. An Obamamite already has said Americans need to wean themselves from having pets - "dogs are like SUVs, and cats are like VWs"
House sizes will be limited. The clothes you wear could be vulnerable to regulation. Where you live will require a government determination. Just read Czars Sunstein and Holdren, and you'll know what lies ahead.
RD
12/08/2009
Posts:138
You should have the right to abuse your environment anyway you want without the interference of any sort of regulation. Chop down every tree, drain every pond and swap, and tear up the terrain to dig out the coal, oil and minerals and then pave it over with roads, shopping centers, more houses and parking lots. Corresponding to you there are another 20 people in the world right now wanting the same things you already have. Perhaps you are young and will get to see all this.
TooMany
12/14/2009
Posts:62
StupidPeasan...
12/08/2009
Posts:47
tmcmurph
12/08/2009
Posts:10
Some call it faith; I call it intellectual dishonesty.
kstauff
12/08/2009
Posts:120
kstauff
12/08/2009
Posts:120
TooMany
12/14/2009
Posts:62
prime3end
12/14/2009
Posts:7
It doesn't take a genius to recognize the observable fact that global average temperature has trended down since 1998 while CO2 emissions have continued to climb, adding to the record amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. These two irrefutable facts simply do not support AGW theory, and the recent discovery of fraud by the core IPCC scientists further erodes the theory's already shaky underpinnings.
No amount of wishful thinking and whining accompanied with fanciful death tolls and falling polar bears changes these facts. AGW is at best junk science and at worst outright fraud, and the point of attempting reasoned discussion with its adherents is passed. It may now be judged in the sunlight of truth, by the public and by the courts. I watch with anticipation.
kstauff
12/14/2009
Posts:120
snedunuri
12/14/2009
Posts:47