Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Potential Energy


Kevin Bullis is Technology Review’s energy editor.

Recent Posts

Blog Topics

Recent Comments

  • lasertekk : Ah, no, it doesn't.  Both methods of transmission are prone to the same resistive losses inherent...
  • kjblack : Being in the renewable energy business in Australia the best option is to install a grid feed...
  • walt : So we should put our chargers, batteries and inverters on the roof? I think the 14AWG wire used...
  • wayne31r : But how do skylights produce electricity and therefore replace PV?
  • ... : Back to the 1880s Edison vs Westinghouse "Battle of the Currents".  Some things never change! ;)
  • MakeSense : Your idea is basically good, but for the practical business of DC transmission losses. Even over...
  • lasertekk : Call me eccentric, but if I were building my dream home from scratch, I just might outfit and run...
  • VuJoe : I am proposing to use thermodynamics principles to convert solar energy to electical energy via...
  • ... : hey..i want to know more abt this..its wonderful..
  • Brian H : Not so clean and limitless as all that; it turns out the fluid use is rather drastically...
Advertisement
Friday, November 13, 2009

DOE Backs Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

A battery that could store three times more energy than lithium-ion batteries gets funded.

One of the most exciting battery chemistries for electric vehicles is lithium-sulfur--it has the potential to store three times more energy than the lithium-ion batteries currently used in electric cars. Historically, however, it's had a number of problems. Early prototypes could only be recharged a few times, the lithium metal used in one of the electrodes caused short circuits and can react violently with water, creating a safety concern, and the carbon that makes the sulfur electrode conductive takes up too much space, decreasing storage capacity.

Earlier this year we reported on several advances geared toward addressing these problems, and noted that these advances had caught the eye of the chemical giant BASF, which is now working to bring lithium-sulfur batteries to market. But challenges remain, including bringing down costs. Now the Department of Energy has also taken an interest in the technology. This week Sion Power Cooperation (which is working with BASF) announced that it has received a three-year, $800,000 DOE grant to further develop the lithium-sulfur batteries for electric vehicles.

Comments

  • Lthium-Sulfur Batteries
    I've been waiting 10 years for this technology to break out and it keeps on sputtering.  Now it seems that it may be obsoleted by even newer more energy dense technologies.  I want to buy an electric car, is there any chance we will see lithium sulfur in the next 5 years?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    tammons
    11/15/2009
    Posts:5
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.