Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Potential Energy


Kevin Bullis is Technology Review’s energy editor.

Recent Posts

Blog Topics

Recent Comments

  • bildan : No way will I support the mandated use of subsidized ethanol.  This needs to be a market...
  • kstauff : Right, we heard the same thing 30 years ago with "The Population Bomb", and yet there are now 3...
  • Gary... :     The Us has the largest coal reserves of any nation.  At current consumption rates we can...
  • Gcanno : Why do we need clean coal if, on this very website and in a video it is explained that we have...
  • lasertekk : I'm very much a humanist, but also a realist.  Too many people leads to too much _____(fill in...
  • lasertekk : So when did Tech Review become the official stomping grounds for NEI lobbyists?
  • spad12 : you forgot about the one that has about 50 million times the energy density of coal, and involves...
  • rvandell : Clean coal.. that’s funny.. since burning "anything" creates green house gas. Face it, there are...
  • kstauff : Al Gore's presentations and film cite the work of the scientists Mann and Briffa, so it looks...
  • kstauff : I always enjoy comments like these from the anti-humanist gonzos. Perhaps you should move there;...
Advertisement
Wednesday, September 30, 2009

U.S. Research Agency Focuses on Energy Storage

Better batteries and other storage technology will be key to making renewable energy dominant.
By Kevin Bullis

As prices for wind and solar power drop, some experts say that the biggest barrier to making renewable energy dominant is the need for cheap and reliable storage.

A new Department of Energy agency, the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Energy (ARPA-E), seems to be listening. It could soon start a new funding round devoted exclusively to energy storage technologies, according to Imre Gyuk, a program manager for energy storage research at the Department of Energy. As a first step, it has also announced a workshop on grid scale energy storage to be held in Seattle on October 4.

Solar and wind technologies seem headed to the point where, in the next several years, they will be able to generate electricity at costs comparable to those of conventional sources.

But there's a catch. Electricity from wind turbines and solar panels isn't worth as much as electricity from coal or natural-gas-fired power plants or from nuclear reactors because it's not always available. When clouds cover the sun, or the wind stops blowing, utilities have to turn to conventional power plants to make up the difference. And, of course, solar doesn't work at all at night.

As the cost of solar comes down--and if researchers can develop cheaper storage--one day it might be practical to build extra solar panels and store the electricity they produce for use on cloudy days and at night. Then, because there's more than enough sunlight for all our energy needs, solar could become a primary source of electricity.

Comments

  • [no subject]
    I advice the author to check this:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intermittent_energy_source

    I appears that there is no need for additional infrastructure investments for 20% renewables penetration.

    The fuzz with the intermittency is unfounded for now and probably will be for the next at least 20 years. But still Grid Energy Storage is very good for stabilizing the Grid even without Renewables - it reduces the "peak" in peak demand.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    dmtk
    10/01/2009
    Posts:9
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Re:
      To be sure, the need for massive energy storage is decades away. And that's what makes it a good candidate for break through research.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Kevin Bullis
      10/01/2009
      Posts:92
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
    • Re:
      dmtk:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intermittent_energy_source

      Paragraph 4: "...significant upgrades may be required to accommodate large amounts of intermittent power."

      Paragraph 6: "At present, the penetration of intermittent renewables in most power grids is low... The use of small amounts of intermittent power has little effect on grid operations. Using larger amounts of intermittent power may require upgrades or even a redesign of the grid infrastructure."

      Having read the above statements one would write: "The fuzz with the intermittency is unfounded for now and probably will be for the next at least 20 years."???
      Rate this comment: 12345

      JTN
      10/02/2009
      Posts:2
  • Grid-scale Energy Storage in Liquid Fuels from CO2
    Use of excess off-peak electrical energy to synthesize standard liquid fuels, such as gasoline and jet fuel, could simultaneously address grid stability, domestic oil limitations, climate change, and economic recovery.  Simulations have shown that practical innovations should make it possible to reduce CO2 to CO at over 90% of theoretical efficiency limits (under 1.55 MJ/kg-CO).  When combined with our other process advances (see the DotyEnergy website), simulations show it should then be possible to synthesize all hydrocarbons and alcohols from point-source CO2 and off-peak clean grid energy (wind or nuclear) by using currently available catalysts at system efficiencies in the range of 53-61%.  Off-peak grid energy averaged only $12/MWhr in the MISO hub in the summer of 2009.  (For reference, the cost of energy in gasoline at $3.60/gal is $100/MWhr.)  At such prices, synthesized standard liquid fuels (dubbed “WindFuels”) could compete even when petroleum is only $45/bbl.  There are sufficient amounts of domestic wind resources (80 TWhr/yr) and point-source CO2 (4 Gt/yr) to produce more than twice the current domestic transportation fuel usage (0.7 Gt/yr).

    Converting CO2 into fuels could eventually eliminate the need for CO2 sequestration and reduce global CO2 emissions by 40%.  Switching 70% of global transportation fuels from petroleum to WindFuels should be possible over the next 35 years.  The scale-up challenges do not appear to be significantly greater from a technical perspective than similar fuel-synthesis challenges addressed successfully by Germany during WWII. (See the DotyEnergy website for more details.)

    Seasonal storage of renewable energy – from spring to summer, and from fall to winter – is desired from both security and economic perspectives.  Energy storage on such a scale is feasible only in the form of chemical bonds in stable liquids.  The cost of the tanks for storing three months supply of U.S. transportation fuel usage in jet fuel, ethanol, and diesel would be under $50B –  only $0.02/kWhr.  The cost of storing that much energy in batteries, pumped-hydro, compressed air, flywheels, or ultra-capacitors would be several thousand times greater.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    FDDoty
    10/01/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • Gravity Power, LLC
    Our Company is pursuing grid scale energy storage and we just emerged from stealth mode.  We use the proven principles of Pumped storage hydro, but eliminate many of its challenges in a modular, closed system.

    Please see:  http://www.prweb.com/releases/gravity-power/electricity-storage/prweb2964714.htm


    Rate this comment: 12345

    cgreeko
    10/03/2009
    Posts:1
  • solarnetwork.net
    We are building an open source software framework to measure the use of renewable energy, looking forward to more affordable deep cycle storage:

    http://www.solarnetwork.net/
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jwgorman
    10/04/2009
    Posts:15
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.