Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Potential Energy


Kevin Bullis is Technology Review’s energy editor.

Recent Posts

Blog Topics

Recent Comments

  • kstauff : I'll reiterate here what I did in my previous response.  The Afghanistan war is not related to...
  • kstauff : "There are more than 700 overseas US military bases, most of which are concentrated in the Middle...
  • mkogrady : Redirecting funds for military security forces in the Middle East would go a long way towards...
  • lasertekk : Yes yes.  I don't know what that figure is, but I would be damn interested in knowing.  Couple...
  • durs : "The current limit effectively puts a cap on the amount of ethanol that can be sold in the U.S."...
  • tsport100 : I have used E10 exclusively for 5 years as it has a higher octane rating than the low grade...
  • gabrielg01 : Before you pontificate about "market based solution", check your facts.   The oil industry gets a...
  • bildan : No way will I support the mandated use of subsidized ethanol.  This needs to be a market...
  • kstauff : Right, we heard the same thing 30 years ago with "The Population Bomb", and yet there are now 3...
  • Gary... :     The Us has the largest coal reserves of any nation.  At current consumption rates we can...
Advertisement
Monday, April 06, 2009

Chrysler's Electric Vehicles Will Use A123 Batteries

The ailing automaker bets on an incipient U.S. battery industry.
By Kevin Bullis

One of the companies GM had considered as a battery-cell supplier for its Volt plug-in hybrid will manufacture the batteries for five plug-in hybrid and electric vehicles to be sold by Chrysler--if the automaker survives its current troubles, that is. The first of these vehicles is slated to be available in 2010.

The company is A123 Systems, a startup based in Watertown, MA, that makes lithium-ion batteries with a chemistry that it says is safer, more powerful, and longer lasting than the lithium-ion batteries now used in portable electronics and some electric cars. Its battery cells are used in power tools and in enormous, tractor-trailer-sized battery packs used to help stabilize the electrical grid. GM partnered with the company to develop automotive batteries, but then decided to go with a more established company, LG Chem, to supply the batteries for the first version of the Volt.

The announcement that Chrysler will use A123's batteries could be a strong political move. The company has already received billions from the government, and to get more money, it will probably need to partner with Fiat. By going with A123, Chrysler could be strengthening its case to get more government help. That's because the move is in line with funding in the stimulus package signed into law in February. One of the goals of that bill is the development of an advanced battery industry in the United States. Right now, almost all advanced batteries for cars are made overseas, particularly in Asia. A123 Systems is a U.S.-based company, but it currently makes its battery cells in Asia, in part because of manufacturing incentives there. The deal with Chrysler, combined with money from the stimulus bill and other related bills, could allow it to set up battery-cell manufacturing in the United States. A123 already assembles its battery cells into larger packs in the United States, and it has applied for $1.2 billion in government loans to build factories in Michigan--a fact highlighted in Chrysler's announcement.

Comments

  • open source EV
    If you're interested in helping design an EV abd charging management system, please check out this open-source project:

    http://sourceforge.net/projects/tumanako
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jwgorman
    04/07/2009
    Posts:15
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Range?
    The problem I see with these 100% battery only vehicles is they lack range.  You can kiss the weekend trip up north or vacation down south goodbye if you can only drive a 100 miles on a charge.  Nobody is going to stick around at a charging  station for 4-8 hours while the car recharges.  What about people who live in apartments, where are they going to recharge. 

    Another issue is where is this electricity coming from? If the answer is coal fired power plants, then how is that any better?

    Another issue that hasn't been discussed is where is this Lithium coming from? Are we trading one foreign dependency for another?

    No we can't keep on the same old fossil fuel track we are on, but are we really ready for a whole new set of problems?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jmaximus9
    04/08/2009
    Posts:83
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • The more the merrier
    Concerns with the range of electric vehicles is the same thinking that justify the 3 row SUV, just to accommodate the few times it is needed every year.  If depreciation on electric vehicles was linear with mileage, rather than date of delivery and insurance was similarly a per mile charge, perhaps we could make some real progress on reducing the overall usage of cars.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ayukawa
    04/08/2009
    Posts:3
  • EV challenges
    The concerns about EV's range, indirect emission (via coal-fired thermal plant), charging time, etc. are nothing new.  Mankind got to have the faith these stuff will be resolved in one generation or so.  The generation portfolio today is moving rapidly toward a multi-source power generation on the world scale: hydro, nuclear, wind, solar, bio-mass and coal.  Compared with only 20 years ago, the picture is shockingly different.  This diversified generation portfolio offers: 1.) energy security; 2.) reduction of emission; 3.) hedging against oil price, ultimately reduce the incidence of war.  Worth it to have electric vehicles?  Absolutely!!!

    Let's talk about EV's charing time.  The chemistry that is capable of receiving power is being developed rapidly albeit costly now.  Before you can realize it, the mankind will be there!  But the chemistry to suck in "juice" fast into the battery is the least worry of the whole game.  The bottleneck is on the supply side - how a gigantic smart grid adds and sheds load almost instantly to accommodate millions of EVs to charge and stop charging is both a technological (also software) challenge and economic (resource allocation) challenge. To charge a 35kWh car in 5 minutes may need a 2MW generator to stand by for that 5 min. and than shed off the load.  This should be mentioned and discussed.  But most folks don't even go there.  Think about "ecosystem"!  We are changing the way we drive and our life style while protecting our earth and our children's well being.

    All in all, the path to a better world cannot be opened without electrification of transportation .  Regardless how much challenge ahead, the direction cannot be reversed unless we want guaranteed self-destruction. 

    KW Seattle Washington
    Rate this comment: 12345

    kylewang
    04/17/2009
    Posts:1
Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.