Monday, April 06, 2009
Chrysler's Electric Vehicles Will Use A123 Batteries
The ailing automaker bets on an incipient U.S. battery industry.
By Kevin Bullis
One of the companies GM had considered as a battery-cell supplier for its Volt plug-in hybrid will manufacture the batteries for five plug-in hybrid and electric vehicles to be sold by Chrysler--if the automaker survives its current troubles, that is. The first of these vehicles is slated to be available in 2010.
The company is A123 Systems, a startup based in Watertown, MA, that makes lithium-ion batteries with a chemistry that it says is safer, more powerful, and longer lasting than the lithium-ion batteries now used in portable electronics and some electric cars. Its battery cells are used in power tools and in enormous, tractor-trailer-sized battery packs used to help stabilize the electrical grid. GM partnered with the company to develop automotive batteries, but then decided to go with a more established company, LG Chem, to supply the batteries for the first version of the Volt.
The announcement that Chrysler will use A123's batteries could be a strong political move. The company has already received billions from the government, and to get more money, it will probably need to partner with Fiat. By going with A123, Chrysler could be strengthening its case to get more government help. That's because the move is in line with funding in the stimulus package signed into law in February. One of the goals of that bill is the development of an advanced battery industry in the United States. Right now, almost all advanced batteries for cars are made overseas, particularly in Asia. A123 Systems is a U.S.-based company, but it currently makes its battery cells in Asia, in part because of manufacturing incentives there. The deal with Chrysler, combined with money from the stimulus bill and other related bills, could allow it to set up battery-cell manufacturing in the United States. A123 already assembles its battery cells into larger packs in the United States, and it has applied for $1.2 billion in government loans to build factories in Michigan--a fact highlighted in Chrysler's announcement.
Comments
http://sourceforge.net/projects/tumanako
jwgorman
04/07/2009
Posts:10
Another issue is where is this electricity coming from? If the answer is coal fired power plants, then how is that any better?
Another issue that hasn't been discussed is where is this Lithium coming from? Are we trading one foreign dependency for another?
No we can't keep on the same old fossil fuel track we are on, but are we really ready for a whole new set of problems?
jmaximus9
04/08/2009
Posts:83
ayukawa
04/08/2009
Posts:3
Let's talk about EV's charing time. The chemistry that is capable of receiving power is being developed rapidly albeit costly now. Before you can realize it, the mankind will be there! But the chemistry to suck in "juice" fast into the battery is the least worry of the whole game. The bottleneck is on the supply side - how a gigantic smart grid adds and sheds load almost instantly to accommodate millions of EVs to charge and stop charging is both a technological (also software) challenge and economic (resource allocation) challenge. To charge a 35kWh car in 5 minutes may need a 2MW generator to stand by for that 5 min. and than shed off the load. This should be mentioned and discussed. But most folks don't even go there. Think about "ecosystem"! We are changing the way we drive and our life style while protecting our earth and our children's well being.
All in all, the path to a better world cannot be opened without electrification of transportation . Regardless how much challenge ahead, the direction cannot be reversed unless we want guaranteed self-destruction.
KW Seattle Washington
kylewang
04/17/2009
Posts:1