Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Potential Energy


Kevin Bullis is Technology Review’s energy editor.

Recent Posts

Blog Topics

Recent Comments

  • lasertekk : Ah, no, it doesn't.  Both methods of transmission are prone to the same resistive losses inherent...
  • kjblack : Being in the renewable energy business in Australia the best option is to install a grid feed...
  • walt : So we should put our chargers, batteries and inverters on the roof? I think the 14AWG wire used...
  • wayne31r : But how do skylights produce electricity and therefore replace PV?
  • ... : Back to the 1880s Edison vs Westinghouse "Battle of the Currents".  Some things never change! ;)
  • MakeSense : Your idea is basically good, but for the practical business of DC transmission losses. Even over...
  • lasertekk : Call me eccentric, but if I were building my dream home from scratch, I just might outfit and run...
  • VuJoe : I am proposing to use thermodynamics principles to convert solar energy to electical energy via...
  • ... : hey..i want to know more abt this..its wonderful..
  • Brian H : Not so clean and limitless as all that; it turns out the fluid use is rather drastically...
Advertisement
Monday, April 06, 2009

Chrysler's Electric Vehicles Will Use A123 Batteries

The ailing automaker bets on an incipient U.S. battery industry.

One of the companies GM had considered as a battery-cell supplier for its Volt plug-in hybrid will manufacture the batteries for five plug-in hybrid and electric vehicles to be sold by Chrysler--if the automaker survives its current troubles, that is. The first of these vehicles is slated to be available in 2010.

The company is A123 Systems, a startup based in Watertown, MA, that makes lithium-ion batteries with a chemistry that it says is safer, more powerful, and longer lasting than the lithium-ion batteries now used in portable electronics and some electric cars. Its battery cells are used in power tools and in enormous, tractor-trailer-sized battery packs used to help stabilize the electrical grid. GM partnered with the company to develop automotive batteries, but then decided to go with a more established company, LG Chem, to supply the batteries for the first version of the Volt.

The announcement that Chrysler will use A123's batteries could be a strong political move. The company has already received billions from the government, and to get more money, it will probably need to partner with Fiat. By going with A123, Chrysler could be strengthening its case to get more government help. That's because the move is in line with funding in the stimulus package signed into law in February. One of the goals of that bill is the development of an advanced battery industry in the United States. Right now, almost all advanced batteries for cars are made overseas, particularly in Asia. A123 Systems is a U.S.-based company, but it currently makes its battery cells in Asia, in part because of manufacturing incentives there. The deal with Chrysler, combined with money from the stimulus bill and other related bills, could allow it to set up battery-cell manufacturing in the United States. A123 already assembles its battery cells into larger packs in the United States, and it has applied for $1.2 billion in government loans to build factories in Michigan--a fact highlighted in Chrysler's announcement.

Comments

  • open source EV
    If you're interested in helping design an EV abd charging management system, please check out this open-source project:

    http://sourceforge.net/projects/tumanako
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jwgorman
    04/07/2009
    Posts:15
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Range?
    The problem I see with these 100% battery only vehicles is they lack range.  You can kiss the weekend trip up north or vacation down south goodbye if you can only drive a 100 miles on a charge.  Nobody is going to stick around at a charging  station for 4-8 hours while the car recharges.  What about people who live in apartments, where are they going to recharge. 

    Another issue is where is this electricity coming from? If the answer is coal fired power plants, then how is that any better?

    Another issue that hasn't been discussed is where is this Lithium coming from? Are we trading one foreign dependency for another?

    No we can't keep on the same old fossil fuel track we are on, but are we really ready for a whole new set of problems?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jmaximus9
    04/08/2009
    Posts:85
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • The more the merrier
    Concerns with the range of electric vehicles is the same thinking that justify the 3 row SUV, just to accommodate the few times it is needed every year.  If depreciation on electric vehicles was linear with mileage, rather than date of delivery and insurance was similarly a per mile charge, perhaps we could make some real progress on reducing the overall usage of cars.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ayukawa
    04/08/2009
    Posts:3
  • EV challenges
    The concerns about EV's range, indirect emission (via coal-fired thermal plant), charging time, etc. are nothing new.  Mankind got to have the faith these stuff will be resolved in one generation or so.  The generation portfolio today is moving rapidly toward a multi-source power generation on the world scale: hydro, nuclear, wind, solar, bio-mass and coal.  Compared with only 20 years ago, the picture is shockingly different.  This diversified generation portfolio offers: 1.) energy security; 2.) reduction of emission; 3.) hedging against oil price, ultimately reduce the incidence of war.  Worth it to have electric vehicles?  Absolutely!!!

    Let's talk about EV's charing time.  The chemistry that is capable of receiving power is being developed rapidly albeit costly now.  Before you can realize it, the mankind will be there!  But the chemistry to suck in "juice" fast into the battery is the least worry of the whole game.  The bottleneck is on the supply side - how a gigantic smart grid adds and sheds load almost instantly to accommodate millions of EVs to charge and stop charging is both a technological (also software) challenge and economic (resource allocation) challenge. To charge a 35kWh car in 5 minutes may need a 2MW generator to stand by for that 5 min. and than shed off the load.  This should be mentioned and discussed.  But most folks don't even go there.  Think about "ecosystem"!  We are changing the way we drive and our life style while protecting our earth and our children's well being.

    All in all, the path to a better world cannot be opened without electrification of transportation .  Regardless how much challenge ahead, the direction cannot be reversed unless we want guaranteed self-destruction. 

    KW Seattle Washington
    Rate this comment: 12345

    kylewang
    04/17/2009
    Posts:1
Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.