Potential Energy

Lilliputian Butane Fuel Cells for Laptops and iPhones

A startup reveals details of its plan to replace lithium ion batteries in electronics.

Kevin Bullis 03/19/2009

  • 4 Comments

A company called Lilliputian Systems wants to replace heavy laptop and mobile phone chargers with a small fuel cell system that runs on butane cartridges. The system can store 5-to-10 times more energy than lithium ion batteries, and recharging it is as fast as swapping out the cartridge.

The company, which has been operating largely in secret for several years, has started showing its first product to potential customers and says that it plans to have them on the market by the middle of next year.

Fuel cells for portable electronics have been a long time coming, held up by a number of things, including technical challenges and questions about whether they'll be allowed on airplanes.

Mouli Ramani, speaking at an MIT Enterprise Forum event this week, said that because the company will sell the butane in sealed cartridges with identification chips, they will be allowed on airplanes. And he claims that they've worked out the technical challenges too. Next up: getting the devices into the marketplace. Their plan is to use a business model something like that used by razor companies, which make money their money on disposable cartridges. Each butane cartridge, which will have enough juice to recharge an iPhone 16-to-20 times, will sell for something like $1 to $3, with the fuel cell charger costing about $200 initially, and eventually going down to about $100. Ramani says that the company plans eventually to incorporate their fuel cells directly into mobile phones and other consumer electronics.

The new system seems to have better energy density than a similarly-sized fuel cell product we recently mentioned. That one only has enough power for five or six charges.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

bigrobhollins

11 Comments

  • 1057 Days Ago
  • 03/23/2009

nice work

  i'd still tell these guys no. they've done a phenomenal, phenominal, phenominol[whatever] job on making an explosive product harnessable for the masses, but i don't like it. not that i don't like it, it just doesn't sit well with the future concept; turning everything into a smoker.. but, hasn't anyone seen 'Back to the Future'? the scientist was putting organic refuse into his generator: i wouldn't mind buying a bag of fritos, crunching it up, and feeding my electronics.  oooh, maybe they'll like gummybears or AbbaZabba.  but hey, the market frenzies off stuff like this right?

Reply

colinnwn

88 Comments

  • 1034 Days Ago
  • 04/15/2009

Re: And what are LiOH cells

But harnessing a potentially explosive chemical to provide electric charge? As long as the fuel cell doesn't leak butane outside of the fuel cell membrane, it should be non-explosive. It will be an interesting question which one is safer in practice.

Reply

SVE

51 Comments

  • 1053 Days Ago
  • 03/27/2009

Disposables & Costs

You have to buy cartridges, and throw them away when they are used. 2 problems: inconvenience, poor environmentals. And finally, there's a better, cheaper alternative: rechargeable batteries.

Reply

colinnwn

88 Comments

  • 1034 Days Ago
  • 04/15/2009

Re: Disposables & Costs

I tend to agree. The small amount of electricity to recharge a battery is almost free, and it can be reused hundreds of times for an initial investment of maybe $100. This thing will cost a couple hundred dollars in lifetime recharging costs, plus an initial cost of $100-200. It would be nice to have the option of both a battery when runtime isn't important, and the fuel cell for when it is.

Reply

Bio

Kevin Bullis is Technology Review’s energy editor.

Subscribe to the Potential Energy RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement