Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Potential Energy


Kevin Bullis is Technology Review’s energy editor.

Recent Posts

Blog Topics

Recent Comments

  • lkrndu : Not really.  How does the comparison really look, once you consider the extremely heavy cost...
  • spad12 : "That's almost as much power as a single nuclear power plant."  Not quite, a typical reactor is...
  • kstauff : "I don't know how anyone can take CO2 seriously after the last few weeks"  Some call it faith; I...
  • kstauff : It should be interesting to see the vaporware of "global warming" hackery put up against the very...
  • ... : I don’t think anyone is claiming that natural cycles of CO2 are dangerous to life.  The concerns...
  • tmcmurph : In case all the warming alarmists, politicians and middle men in the proposed carbon scam have...
  • claudioona : Nothing is more essential to life than water. This fact does not make floods less deadly and...
  • ... : Hacked e-mails, political power, billions of dollars, water vapor, effects of sun, and just a...
  • jmaximus9 : No GM is not about to kill the Volt! The Ford Fusion Hybrid cost $30,000 the Volt will only be...
  • RD : The cost of ethanol must take the damage it does into consideration. Read the Outdoor Power...
Advertisement
Tuesday, February 24, 2009

NASA's Climate Satellite Crashes Back to Earth

The failure means that a gap in climate science will remain.
By Kevin Bullis
NASA's Orbiting Carbon Observatory and its Taurus booster lift off from Vandenberg Air Force Base. Credit: Orbital Sciences Corporation

A satellite designed to answer one of the biggest remaining questions in climate-change science has fallen into the ocean after a launch failure, the Associated Press reports.

The amount of climate change in the next decades could be much more or much less than currently predicted because of a significant gap in scientists' knowledge. One of the greatest uncertainties in predicting climate change is what natural mechanisms are involved in capturing carbon dioxide. Currently, on average, half of the carbon dioxide released by burning fossil fuels is taken up by oceans and plants; it doesn't remain in the atmosphere, so it doesn't contribute to global warming. But because scientists don't know precisely which mechanisms are involved or necessarily how they work, they're not sure that this will continue.

There are two distinct possibilities. First, the mechanisms could shut down. For example, some argue that the oceans won't be able to absorb much more carbon dioxide, and may even start releasing some of what they've absorbed so far, speeding climate change. On the other hand, other natural mechanisms for absorbing carbon dioxide could actually increase in the future, slowing global warming.

The differences between the two could be extreme. Even now, from year to year, the amount of carbon dioxide that's absorbed varies widely: sometimes none of the carbon dioxide emitted by fossil fuels is absorbed; sometimes just about all of it is (though this is likely due to weather variations, including droughts, and not necessarily due to long-term trends).

The satellite was designed to help scientists determine which mechanisms are dominant by allowing them to trace where carbon dioxide is being absorbed, and how much. Ground-based measurement stations aren't up to the task.

Money in the stimulus bill directed toward NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration could pay for a new carbon-dioxide monitoring satellite. A Japanese satellite launched earlier this year is also gathering information about carbon dioxide, but with significantly less resolution than the NASA satellite.

Comments

Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.