Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Potential Energy


Kevin Bullis is Technology Review’s energy editor.

Recent Posts

Blog Topics

Recent Comments

  • Thucydides : Of course, the solution has been in front of you all along, but consistently blocked by the...
  • asogan : Natural gas is normally used for the thermal energy requirements of the plant e.g. process heat...
  • crrick50 : I agree with most of the posts that it is impractical and does not address the human factor. The...
  • nekote : The reason *corn grain ethanol* is heavily dependent on the price of natural gas is because...
  • ... : Eddie:    It is the price of corn ethanol that is 'heavily dependant' on natural gas.   FROM THE...
  • Devere : Kevin, I'm confused about why the price of cellulosic ethanol depends on the price of natural gas...
  • mkogrady : KStauff,  Your comments on separating subsidies and military overhead for securing petroleum in...
  • matlseng : I agree with cutting back the budget for hydrogen fuel cells. They are not economically feasible...
  • kjblack : Old Chinese proverb. "You cant make a silk purse out of a sows ear."
  • mkogrady : I have to be convinced that our involvement is not relate to oil or petroleum. So far it seems...
Advertisement
Tuesday, December 16, 2008

China's New Green Machine

The F3DM plug-in hybrid reinforces China's position as a growing green-tech power.
By Peter Fairley
The plug-in version of BYD's F3 promises over 60 miles of gas-free driving.

While major automakers like GM and Toyota are preparing to build their first plug-in hybrid vehicles, a Chinese battery maker has beat them to it.

As of yesterday, Shenzen-based BYD Auto--a subsidiary of leading Chinese rechargeable-battery producer BYD Group--is selling the world's first mass-produced plug-in hybrid car, according to Bloomberg. This battery-loaded version of BYD's F3 sedan is said to travel up to 100 kilometers (62 miles) on stored grid power alone.

Many observers deride the car's styling as plain and derivative. But the BBC's global business correspondent Peter Day, who drove BYD's plug-in this weekend, says that they're missing the point: "Critics say this is a copycat car, but that is how the Japanese auto industry started."

Green Car Congress reports that the plug-in is dubbed the F3DM after its "dual-mode" hybrid system--misleadingly dubbed, that is, because the vehicle actually operates in three distinct modes:

  • a battery-powered EV mode
  • a series-hybrid mode whereby the gas engine recharges the batteries while the electric motors drive the wheels, and
  • a parallel-hybrid mode whereby both motor and engine drive the wheels.

This marks a contrast with GM's Chevy Volt, due out two years from now, which dispatches with the parallel hybrid option.

BYD Auto's parent company is making lithium batteries for the car using lithium iron phosphate cathodes--a safer design than the lithium cobalt oxide cathodes used in cell-phone batteries. Boston-area battery developer A123 uses the same chemistry, and although A123 is thought to have lost out in the competition to supply the first-generation Chevy Volt, it is in the running for many other hybrids and electric vehicles in development.

BYD says that it will bring the F3DM to the U.S. market in 2011, but it must first pass U.S. crash tests and set up a dealer network. The company has a well-connected U.S. investor to help navigate the U.S. hurdles: billionaire investor Warren Buffet, whose Berkshire Hathaway investment group bought a one-tenth stake in BYD for $230 million in September.

So China has beat the U.S. and Europe to market with what was supposed to be GM's signature development. The headline reinforces a growing sense that China is suddenly a green-technology developer to be reckoned with. It looks as though the Cleantech Group may have got it right earlier this month when, summing up its forum in Shanghai, it concluded that China could soon be "the world's leading laboratory, market for and exporter of clean technologies."

Comments

  • 1 Missing Piece
    The fact that U.S. regulations have not been met is a minor footnote in this article.  This is the primary reason why these vehicles take so ong to bring to market in the U.S. and EU markets.  GM is still on track to get the Volt to market before BYD plans to bring their vehicle to the U.S.  This is not a complaint against the value adding regulations in the developed markets - only an important reminder that a plug-in hybrid in China does not equal a plug-in hybrid in the U.S. or EU.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    partington
    12/16/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: 1 Missing Piece
      GM almost went bust and is still not out of the woods yet. Does anybody expect them to finish the Volt, especially when oil prices are down?
      Rate this comment: 12345

      TaffyDownUnd...
      12/16/2008
      Posts:4
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
    • Re: 1 Missing Piece
      Don R. Graber, Chairman, President and CEO of Huffy Corporation, commented, "As Huffy Corporation management developed tactical plans to support our strategic vision of creating a diversified, branded sporting goods company and retail services company with total revenues of $750 million to $1.0 billion, internal growth fueled by new products and services emerged as a corporate-wide priority. Products such as the Green Machine are an example of the creativity of our product development team and its commitment to bringing innovative products, offering great value and quality, to the marketplace and of our commitment to support and grow our brands through direct-to-consumer advertising."
      Rate this comment: 12345

      jack333
      09/23/2009
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      1/5
  • Battery Design
    Didn't A123 patent their battery breakthrough? 
    Rate this comment: 12345

    DennisBuller
    12/16/2008
    Posts:40
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: Battery Design
      Did BYD patent their battery?
      Rate this comment: 12345

      junjun25
      12/23/2008
      Posts:1
      • Re: Battery Design
          Both of them cannot be using the same battery technology unless there was a deal done, or one of them is stealing.
          It would be nice if the author would clarify who owns the better battery technology, and if there was a deal made.
          Who owns iron phosphate cathode technology?
        Rate this comment: 12345

        DennisBuller
        01/01/2009
        Posts:40
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
        • Re: Battery Design
          BYD has commercialized an implementation of AyMPO4 . It is a different solution than A123.

          LiFePO4's patent is owned by Professor Goodenough at UT Austin. But A123 successfully defeated UTexas in a lawsuit so that now the patent coverage is very limited. You can see the details from this link:
          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium_iron_phosphate

          I do not think UTexas can sue BYD for patent infringe - with the A123 case as reference, BYD can win easily.

          I do not think A123 can sue BYD for patent infringe - it is a completely different technology.
          Rate this comment: 12345

          saimneor
          01/02/2009
          Posts:1
          Avg Rating:
          3/5
  • Disruptive Tecnology Definition
    "Critics say this is a copycat car, but that is how the Japanese auto industry started."
    Rate this comment: 12345

    javs
    12/17/2008
    Posts:89
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • lithium batteries
    I'd be concerned that lithium is a short supply for use in automobiles. It will be expensive after the easiest supply in Chili is exhausted. What do they do after the stuff that's $12K/ton is gone?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Larry McFarl...
    12/18/2008
    Posts:3
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Why Import Electronic Products From China?
    The reason why you can import electronic products from China and the introduction of Tradestead Corp--Incredible cheap price of Chinese electronic products

    China is the largest factory in the world, especially in the production of MP3 Players, MP4 Players, Digital Cameras, Digital Photo Frames, Digital Photo Banks, Video Players, Electronic Gadgets, Security Products, Accessories, Car Video, Car Audio, Telecommunication Equipment, Beauty Devices and Fitness Devices. The unbelievably cheap production cost for these products in China is well-known to everybody.

    Who is the best electronics supplier in China?
    Tradestead Corporation Limited.

    ........................................................
    Wholesale Electronics Direct From China
    Tradestead Corporation Limited  http://www.tradestead.com
    Rate this comment: 12345

    tradestead
    12/30/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    1/5
  • Imports to China
    If GM wanted to export the VOLT to China, they would be required to have a Chinese partner and to build them there. Somehow this fact doesn't even seem to register with our self righteous free traders in congress. China can import all they want here, with a mere 2% tariff, the same can not be said of exports to there.  I say it is time for reciprocity. Lets apply their rules on us to them.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jmaximus9
    01/23/2009
    Posts:83
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Imports to China
      Graphic novelist Andy Fish intends to find and teach his profession's next generation in Emerson's new Graphic Novel Writing and Illustration program, available through the Office of Professional Studies and Continued Education.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      common1
      06/15/2009
      Posts:3
      Avg Rating:
      1/5
  • Cheap and Best China Products
    The China electronics products are very cheap and best with latest technology, you can compare prices from uk based.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    henrymichel
    05/06/2009
    Posts:1
Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.