TR Editors' blog

Federal Agencies Woo Security Researchers

Government representatives outline the current U.S. cybersecurity research and development goals.

Erica Naone 05/20/2010

  • 2 Comments

Representatives of the National Science Foundation, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence came yesterday to the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy in Oakland, CA, to describe the federal government's current wish list for cybersecurity research. The representatives described three main ways that the federal government is interested in spending its money on academic work.

First, they asked for "moving target" technologies. The idea here is that current systems favor attackers--the defender's system remains the same and the attacker is able to hammer away at it until exploits are found. With moving targets, federal government agencies hope to shift this scenario to make it harder and more expensive for attackers to penetrate systems. The idea is that systems that are complex and easily changed by defenders make an attacker's job more difficult. This runs against traditional security wisdom, which is that adding complexity opens up more room for vulnerabilities.

Second, the federal agencies asked for work on "tailored trustworthy spaces." Here, they hope researchers can create islands within systems that meet particular security requirements and that are easy to put up and take down. The hope is that it would be possible to have a verifiably secure work environment that was fine-tuned to match the task the user is carrying out.

Finally, the representatives outlined the need for a better understanding of the economics of security. Currently, security is often an afterthought for software developers. When companies do invest in security, the results can be haphazard, scattershot, and hard to measure. The federal agencies are hoping to get a clearer picture of what types of investments would help defenders, and they are asking for solutions that might again shift the advantage away from attackers. Right now, it doesn't cost an attacker much to go after a system, and cyber crime promises high rewards. The agencies hope to find ways to encourage improvements to overall security, and to discourage attackers.

Jeannette Wing, assistant director of the computer and information science and engineering directorate of the National Science Foundation, stressed that with all three of these agendas, the federal government is hoping to break away from the current security arms race and find new directions. Since the federal representatives spoke in front of some of the world's top security researchers, it should be interesting to see how the concepts are received.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Mapou

356 Comments

  • 629 Days Ago
  • 05/20/2010

Useful Link

Toward a Federal Cybersecurity Game-change Research Agenda

It's about time that we demand breakthrough ideas in cyber security. Our current approaches obviously leave a lot to be desired.

Reply

mattgroom

286 Comments

  • 623 Days Ago
  • 05/26/2010

economics

Points 1 and 3 are moot.
Not sure why they are even proposing them really.

Now to point 2 the real meat and veg of their intelligence.

I like the idea.

Firstly they need to remove 3rd parties from actually being connected to the system while in that secure area id say.

Second youd have to be able to authenticate every program that is and would be run in that space... Unbelievably wickedly hard task that one....or not.
Is it achievable....yes but not with our current o/s.. youd need a self testing file system against another backup system that is untouchable... and pre-authenticated of course.

The problem i see is the chicken and egg... If you make the space then attach to a server to authenticate files, your computer could be infected already. If you obtain a smartcard of the files and put it in your computer..your computer could still be infected and you think you were safe.

2 solutions exist a bootable disc you acquire from the bank (only) signed and certified that sets up this initial safe area that then authenticates the files. This one sucks balls of course and is about as reliable as getting it from your local chinese embassy or russian mafia, but its not bad.
The second ill keep to myself becuase its much better and i thought of it 20 years ago.

Yes it doesnt surprise me the federal agencies are 20 years behind the times but there you go.

job done point 2 achieved.

Reply

About

Insights, opinions, and our editors' analysis of the latest in emerging technologies.

Subscribe to the TR Editors' blog RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement