Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

TR Editors' blog

Insights, opinions, and our editors' analysis of the latest in emerging technologies.

Blog Topics

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • Gaetano... : .exactly 13 months ago, I've predicted the release of a $99 "Web based" (that now, "cool people"...
  • gblaze44 : I agree, also with amniotic fluid and placental tissue stem cells, there really is no need to use...
  • shomas : Pluripotent stem cells have a greater long term potential then embryonic stem cell anyways, and...
  • ... : Thanks! I posted your reply for the benefit of my curious readers. It is a reasonable question,...
  • kgrifant : The researchers confirmed that 130 km/hr is the helicopter spec (measured by radar gun), though...
Advertisement
Monday, December 07, 2009

Mobile Malware Isn't So Bad, For Now

Cell phones remain less vulnerable than PCs, but for how long?
By Erica Naone

This weekend a Swiss computer security researcher released an application designed to demonstrated the kind of personal information that a malicious iPhone application could potentially harvest personal from unwary users (pdf). The disclosure came just two weeks after the first truly malicious iPhone worm was released for jailbroken iPhones.

So, are we're on the brink of a mobile malware pandemic?

Not necessarily, says MikkoHypponen, chief research officer for the Internet security company F-Secure, based in Helsinki, Finland. Hypponen has been collecting mobile malware specimens for the past 10 years. His count, so far, is 454 mobile viruses and Trojans since 2004. And, despite many security experts predicting that serious attacks against mobile devices are inevitable, Hypponen has observed the opposite trend. "Instead of getting worse, malware on mobile devices has been slowing down over the past two years," he says.

The main reason, Hypponen suggests, is that most phone platforms exercise more control over the applications they run than desktop computers do. For example, mandatory application signing for the iPhone means that programs can't run without authorization from Apple. Android's open platform doesn't use mandatory signing, but Google has designed a new security model for the operating system to minimize the damage that can be done by a malicious application.

Hypponen also believes that fragmentation in the phone market has hindered malware writers so far: no single mobile operating system dominates the way Windows does on the desktop, so it's hard for virus writers to know where to focus their efforts. Furthermore, he says, far fewer people have the sort of low-level knowledge of specific mobile devices that's needed to create successful malware.

However, Hypponen notes that the malware observed so far requires a user to install something malicious, instead of exploiting a vulnerability in the operating system itself. The real danger, he says, is when malware authors discover ways to attack a mobile device without that level of user participation.

"When that happens," Hypponen says, "everything we know about mobile malware will have changed."

Comments

Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review September/October 2010

Current Issue

The TR35
Our annual selection of the world's top innovators under the age of 35.
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.