Verizon's Droid will combine Google's OS with a great network.
By Erica Naone
Buzz exploded this weekend over Verizon's entry into the smartphone wars, the Droid. Expected to go on the market in November, the phone boasts some impressive features, including a five-megapixel camera, and version 2.0 of Google's Android operating system (more images here).
Most attention so far has focused on Verizon's potshots against Apple's iPhone. Ads for the Droid criticize the iPhone's batteries (which the user can't easily change), the lack of open development, and the inability to run simultaneous apps. Some have noted that average users probably aren't going to understand or care about many of these points, and I agree.
But if Verizon
doesn't botch the launch of this new phone with its incomprehensible ad
campaign, I think it could lead to the first real test of what a smartphone can do. The iPhone has already changed users' behavior and vastly increased expectations. AT&T's network, however, has been creaking under the strain. T-Mobile has made a real effort to get out ahead with Android support, but it also lacks the network to really draw users.
For a while, it's seemed strange to me that Verizon could spend billions of dollars building up its network, even though it hadn't yet launched a really exciting smartphone. By all accounts, the Droid looks like a strong entry,
and I'm looking forward to finding out what happens when a great device
is backed by such a network.
If the Droid launch goes well for Verizon, it'll give a big boost to Android. There are currently about 10,000 apps in the Android Market, compared with some 85,000 in the iPhone App
Store. I think the Android Market is behind partly because there's been
no single device to serve as a flagship attracting developers (I don't
think T-Mobile's G1 had enough cachet to serve in this role). With
strong backing from Verizon, the Droid could give Android the recognizable and attractive face it needs to really take off.
I don't own an iPhone, but it's my understanding that many of the 85k apps are just stupid joke apps with little or no utility at all. I would expect that for any platform the most useful apps would be created first, so perhaps the Android phones are not as far behind as you might think.
Interesting point. I don't know in what order the most useful apps are written. It sometimes looks to me like the joke apps get thrown up in a big gold rush at the beginning and more serious apps don't go up until later.
I think the number of apps is one way of gauging developer interest, however, and it does appear that more developers are interested in iPhone apps at the moment.
Comments
kstauff
10/20/2009
Posts:94
I think the number of apps is one way of gauging developer interest, however, and it does appear that more developers are interested in iPhone apps at the moment.
Erica Naone
10/20/2009
Posts:43