In its first meeting, the committee to review human spaceflight listened to private companies explain why their launch vehicles are better than NASA's.
During the
first meeting of the Augustine panel, a committee charged with reviewing the
future of U.S. human spaceflight, on Wednesday, members heard several private companies argue that
their launch vehicles would be cheaper and more reliable than the Ares rockets currently
being developed by NASA to succeed the aging space shuttles. The Ares are part
of the Constellation program which outlines plans to send humans back to the
moon by 2020, and then to Mars and beyond.
The
committee's report isn't due until the end of August, but Norm Augustine, the
committee chairman, has already said that some commercial launch efforts appear
further along than he previously thought. Of the issues brought forth, Augustine
said that the availability of commercial rockets as an alternative to
launch Orion and the concept of reusing the space shuttle launch system, were
the most interesting.
The
committee heard from United Space Alliance, which says it could use an
existing Delta rocket to launch the Orion crew capsule into space sooner and
cheaper than the Ares I rocket, which is first scheduled to launch in 2015. The Aerospace Corporation added that it could use
a modified Delta IV Heavy rocket to save between $3 billion and $6 billion.
(Aviation Week has a report about a new study that suggests various advantages
of using the Delta IV over the Ares I--although the report has not been
released.)
SpaceX and Orbital
Sciences also offered their
services for taking cargo and humans to the
International Space Station, not only to fill the gap between when the shuttles
retire and the next launch vehicle is ready for flight, but to service the
station afterwards to save money. Both companies already have a contract with
NASA through the COTS
program for cargo flights to the station.
Lastly, a
company called Direct proposed using space shuttle parts to build a new launch
vehicle, claiming that the components will already be tested, and it will be
cheaper and faster to build.
While the
panel did not hear from Ares program managers, I was able to speak with many of
them while reporting on the Ares I-X test-flight rocket, which will launch in
August. (The article will appear in the July/August print issue, and publish
online June 23.) When asked about being overbudget and behind schedule, Jon
Cowart, deputy project manager said, "if Congress wants to give us more
money so we can accelerate the development, we would love to do it, but right
now we are in a go-as-you-pay situation."
The recommendations
of the Augustine panel are critical to the future of U.S. human spaceflight,
and decisions on NASA's budget are on hold until the panel concludes. Despite
the uncertainty, Steve Cook, NASA Ares project manager at Goddard Space Flight
Center, remains enthusiastic about the future."This is an exciting time,
and we have a team that is motivated to build the exploration launch system to
move us beyond low earth orbit," he says. Follow and take
part in panel discussions. Next topic: What role should international partners play in future U.S. spaceflight plans, and why?
Comments
As a federal bureaucracy, their leadership is always questionable, and unstable.
Their employees cannot be fired, no matter how badly they screw up.
And their history of sticking with failed technology proves they as an organization are not up to the task at hand.
The task of getting us into space cheaply and safely.
Even with all the new materials and computing power they have failed to do so.
They just launched a probe to the moon to look for water. Over 500 Million dollars to do it....
If they put 500 Million dollars into finding a better way to get off the planet they would. But they are wedded to Von Braun’s corpse.
DennisBuller
06/21/2009
Posts:40
aniruddha.gu...
06/22/2009
Posts:1
ideas here. It is the same good old boy
not invented here mentality.
I only work with Asian countries now. They are
more receptive to innovation.
Antimatter propulsion
Near light speed propulsion
Microwave power transmission satellite
and other technologies.
I remember telling NASA in 6 seconds their 5 year
10 million project wouldn't work. They said your right, how did you know ? Need I say more.
holoman
06/22/2009
Posts:24