TR Editors' blog

Augustine Panel Hears Alternative Ideas for Spaceflight

In its first meeting, the committee to review human spaceflight listened to private companies explain why their launch vehicles are better than NASA's.

Brittany Sauser 06/19/2009

  • 3 Comments

During the first meeting of the Augustine panel, a committee charged with reviewing the future of U.S. human spaceflight, on Wednesday, members heard several private companies argue that their launch vehicles would be cheaper and more reliable than the Ares rockets currently being developed by NASA to succeed the aging space shuttles. The Ares are part of the Constellation program which outlines plans to send humans back to the moon by 2020, and then to Mars and beyond.

The committee's report isn't due until the end of August, but Norm Augustine, the committee chairman, has already said that some commercial launch efforts appear further along than he previously thought. Of the issues brought forth, Augustine said that the availability of commercial rockets as an alternative to launch Orion and the concept of reusing the space shuttle launch system, were the most interesting.

The committee heard from United Space Alliance, which says it could use an existing Delta rocket to launch the Orion crew capsule into space sooner and cheaper than the Ares I rocket, which is first scheduled to launch in 2015. The Aerospace Corporation added that it could use a modified Delta IV Heavy rocket to save between $3 billion and $6 billion. (Aviation Week has a report about a new study that suggests various advantages of using the Delta IV over the Ares I--although the report has not been released.)

SpaceX and Orbital Sciences also offered their services for taking cargo and humans to the International Space Station, not only to fill the gap between when the shuttles retire and the next launch vehicle is ready for flight, but to service the station afterwards to save money. Both companies already have a contract with NASA through the COTS program for cargo flights to the station.

Lastly, a company called Direct proposed using space shuttle parts to build a new launch vehicle, claiming that the components will already be tested, and it will be cheaper and faster to build.

While the panel did not hear from Ares program managers, I was able to speak with many of them while reporting on the Ares I-X test-flight rocket, which will launch in August. (The article will appear in the July/August print issue, and publish online June 23.) When asked about being overbudget and behind schedule, Jon Cowart, deputy project manager said, "if Congress wants to give us more money so we can accelerate the development, we would love to do it, but right now we are in a go-as-you-pay situation."

The recommendations of the Augustine panel are critical to the future of U.S. human spaceflight, and decisions on NASA's budget are on hold until the panel concludes. Despite the uncertainty, Steve Cook, NASA Ares project manager at Goddard Space Flight Center, remains enthusiastic about the future."This is an exciting time, and we have a team that is motivated to build the exploration launch system to move us beyond low earth orbit," he says. Follow and take part in panel discussions. Next topic: What role should international partners play in future U.S. spaceflight plans, and why?

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

DennisBuller

118 Comments

  • 962 Days Ago
  • 06/21/2009

NASA

   The best thing that NASA could do is stop being an agency that DOES things and become and agency that OVERSEES things.
   As a federal bureaucracy, their leadership is always questionable, and unstable.
   Their employees cannot be fired, no matter how badly they screw up.
   And their history of sticking with failed technology proves they as an organization are not up to the task at hand.
  The task of getting us into space cheaply and safely.
   Even with all the new materials and computing power they have failed to do so.
   They just launched a probe to the moon to look for water. Over 500 Million dollars to do it....
    If they put 500 Million dollars into finding a better way to get off the planet they would. But they are wedded to Von Braun’s corpse. 

   

Reply

  • 961 Days Ago
  • 06/22/2009

It's CRS not COTS that pays for ISS resupply. Direct is not a company. It is an informal group of NASA and contractor engineers working on an alternative to Ares 1/5 on their own time.

Reply

holoman

37 Comments

  • 961 Days Ago
  • 06/22/2009

Too much trouble working with USA

I gave up trying to introduce bleeding edge
ideas here. It is the same good old boy
not invented here mentality.

I only work with Asian countries now. They are
more receptive to innovation.

Antimatter propulsion
Near light speed propulsion
Microwave power transmission satellite
and other technologies.

I remember telling NASA in 6 seconds their 5 year
10 million project wouldn't work. They said your right, how did you know ? Need I say more.


Reply

About

Insights, opinions, and our editors' analysis of the latest in emerging technologies.

Subscribe to the TR Editors' blog RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement